Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Compare and Contrast - Kerry v. Dean on Today Show

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
 
ModerateMiddle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 06:04 PM
Original message
Compare and Contrast - Kerry v. Dean on Today Show
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cherryperry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. After taking a look at both interviews,
the most glaring issue for me was that Dean sorta attacked other Democrats and Kerry stuck to attacking Bush. Also, as a 1996 Nader voter, I found it absurd for Dean to think he would attract any green party members.

It still seems to me that with the Heinz fortune backing him up and with his insider status among the powers-that-be in the democratic party that Kerry will be the nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I dont think he will and frankly
I think Kerry with his solid environmental record would be more appealing to greens than dean but greens like Kucinich right now and so do I, I am a democrat by the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nocreativename Donating Member (121 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm a green for dean
Only becuase I lobbied for roadless forests, superfund, and against bush's healthy forest bill. I've never seen Kerry really stand out and do much not like Boxer or Murray or even Leach.

And it kind of bothers me that he says he has a great enviro record. It is one thing to vote it is another co spouncer or spouncer bills.

However, Dean has put together a good environmental plan. And really when it comes down to it most American's right now don't about the environmental as mucch as they do jobs.

and this is coming from someone who works for an enviro group.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. ok, I understand,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ModerateMiddle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. I think there is a big difference
between speaking up and doing what it takes to get the right things done. Have you checked out Kerry's environmental record? He gets very high marks from LCV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I can retrieve those
source: http://www.vote-smart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=S0421103#Environment
Environment
(Back to top)


2002 On the votes that the American Coalition for Ethanol considered to be the most important in 2002, Senator Kerry voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time.

2002 There is no evaluation available for Senator Kerry from the group Sierra Club.

2001-2002 On the votes that the League of Conservation Voters considered to be the most important in 2001-2002, Senator Kerry voted their preferred position 92 percent of the time.

2001-2002 On the votes that the Comprehensive US Sustainable Population considered to be the most important in 2001-2002, Senator Kerry voted their preferred position 73 percent of the time.

2000 On the votes that the American Lands Alliance considered to be the most important in 2000, Senator Kerry voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time.

1999-2000 On the votes that the League of Conservation Voters considered to be the most important in 1999-2000, Senator Kerry voted their preferred position 94 percent of the time.

1999-2000 On the votes that the National Parks Conservation Association considered to be the most important in 1999-2000 , Senator Kerry voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time.

1999-2000 On the votes that the Comprehensive US Sustainable Population considered to be the most important in 1999-2000, Senator Kerry voted their preferred position 84 percent of the time.


These are very good imo.










.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George_Bonanza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. You said it kp
Dean definitely can't match up to Kerry on the environment. Words ring hollow when you're in the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Here Is Public Citizen's Record On Kerry
Pick any year to look at Kerry's record on many of the Green Party's core issues - campaign finance reform, legal rights/civil justice, regulatory protections, health care protection, consumer rights, safe and clean energy, global trade reforms, and corporate welfare. Kerry is consistently one of their highest ranking members of Congress.

Ralph Nader started the group.

http://www.citizen.org/congress/voting/

For zipcode, type in 02101.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. Kerry doesn't have a good environmental record?
Dean has put together a good environmental plan?

I'll alert the media - AND the environmental groups Kerry has been actively working wiith for over 30 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. maybe for people who expect all A students heh
But with Dean environmentalists wouldnt get an A or a B student. I think Kerry really is one of the good guys, despite his trouble some votes I really think that in some cases Dean would have done the same, and Kerry supported stuff Dean would have opposed and vice versa.
2002 On the votes that the American Coalition for Ethanol considered to be the most important in 2002, Senator Kerry voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time.

2002 There is no evaluation available for Senator Kerry from the group Sierra Club.

2001-2002 On the votes that the League of Conservation Voters considered to be the most important in 2001-2002, Senator Kerry voted their preferred position 92 percent of the time.

2001-2002 On the votes that the Comprehensive US Sustainable Population considered to be the most important in 2001-2002, Senator Kerry voted their preferred position 73 percent of the time.

2000 On the votes that the American Lands Alliance considered to be the most important in 2000, Senator Kerry voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time.

1999-2000 On the votes that the League of Conservation Voters considered to be the most important in 1999-2000, Senator Kerry voted their preferred position 94 percent of the time.

1999-2000 On the votes that the National Parks Conservation Association considered to be the most important in 1999-2000 , Senator Kerry voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time.

1999-2000 On the votes that the Comprehensive US Sustainable Population considered to be the most important in 1999-2000, Senator Kerry voted their preferred position 84 percent of the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Who did Dean attack in this morning's interview?
He was asked a direct question about the other candidates. I don't think he attacked others?

What did I miss?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherryperry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. You are correct! He was responding to a question,
my bad - please forgive me, but I still wish demo candidates wouldn't take the bait, know what I mean? :loveya: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Kerry can't use his wife's fortune in his campaign.
She can buy issue ads, though. That's about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. That's About It!?!
Do you have any idea how much of a campaign's finances are sucked dry by TV ads? Ask Dean, who's taking a big gamble on his early ads, especially in Texas. Maybe the only good thing Torricelli ever did was address the TV ad aspect of campaign financing. Big media naturally killed his amendment, but the concern is real.

Keep in mind that Teresa is in the top 400 most wealthy people in America. She can buy more than an ad or two if the mood strikes her.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Dean Dodged The Balanced Budget Question
He said he wouldn't need to slash programs so much as control spending growth. That sounds a little fuzzy to me.

Secondly, I think Lauer - in his innocent way - really knocked back Dean on the scale of Vermont compared to the United States. I think Dean had better prepare for this, because he is sure to be attacked on the insignificance of Vermont's population, revenues, and lack of a major metropolitan area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorPlum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Georgia and Arkansas
are not that big. But you're right, VT is smaller.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ModerateMiddle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yeah
Vermont is about the same population as the county I live in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Even though Vermont is small, it still is an example of his values.
He hates defecit spending and knows about handling money, wants to expand healthcare, wants to protect the environment, wants to expand minimum wage, wants policies which will help us in the future, wants to protect civil rights, and won't support useless gun control laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Uh, exactly like Kerry?
One minor note - Dean is actually pretty liberal on gun laws at the national level. Despite his support for "state's rights," his support for the Brady bill and such is going to lead to a clear endorsement for Bush in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Bush supports the current gun laws...
The NRA will endorse him anyway, of course.

But yeah, Saying good things about Dean doesn't mean it's a negative against Kerry. And vice versa.

But Kerry supported child safety locks on all guns which probably wouldn't do anything and seems kind of useless to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I Wasn't Saying It Was Negative Against Kerry
I was pointing out the remarkable similarities of their positions.

And here's Sarah Brady on child safety locks:

"Today, the Senate Judiciary Committee turned its back on America’s children. The Committee voted against a common sense measure, introduced by Sen. Herb Kohl (D-WI), which would require child safety locks to be sold with every handgun in the U.S. To deflect public scrutiny, the Committee passed a toothless substitute amendment, introduced by Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT), which will do nothing to reduce gun injury among children. Hatch’s face-saving amendment simply requires child safety locks to be available for sale in gun stores, it does not require the locks to be sold with every purchase. The Hatch amendment will have no impact because most gun stores already carry child safety locks as part of their standard inventory.

"Sen. Kohl’s proposed legislation, however, would send a clear message to handgun purchaser that the only way to keep children safe from guns in the home is to unload them and lock them up. This is exactly what we need. A recent Justice Department study found that irresponsible gun ownership is rampant in the United States. Fifty-five percent of all handgun owners keep their handguns loaded and 34 percent keep a handgun loaded and unlocked. It should not be surprising, therefore, that children unintentionally fire guns 10,000 times every year, resulting in at least 800 deaths. Another 1,900 children and teenagers attempt suicide with a firearm every year.

"Child safety locks could go a long way in reducing these gun injuries and deaths among young people. In fact, a recent study by the U.S. General Accounting Office found that properly -used child safety locks -- sold for as little as $10.95 -- could prevent all unintentional firearm deaths in which children under age 6 kill themselves or others.

http://www.bradycampaign.org/press/release.asp?Record=72
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC