Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

9-11 NOT Terrorists?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Ekaterina Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 02:59 PM
Original message
9-11 NOT Terrorists?
Just wondering if anyone else out there has considered whether or not 9-11 was also a fabrication of the corrupt bushites desperately seeking their version of the 1933 Reichstag fire.......I mean, has anyone else ever wondered HOW we could have known NOTHING about such massive plans and then have the names, addresses and photos of the hijackers 16 days after the crash. Why none of the hijackers were listed on the plane manifests? Why the pentagon doesn't even LOOK like a plane hit it (no debris can be seen in early photos etc)? Why no government official has pushed to make the folks who fought back and "saved Washington" national heroes whose names would NEVER be forgotten? Stuff like that. Maybe it's just me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Welcome to DU
This has been quite a topic of discussion on DU for the past couple of years. Just keep checking this thread and folks will point you to storehouses of knowledge upon this subject.

You will see the terms LIHOP and MIHOP a lot. They stand for Let It Happen On Purpose and Made It Happen On Purpose.

On my good days I am a LIHOPer and on the bad ones a MIHOPer.

So, to answer your question, you are certainly not alone in these beliefs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ekaterina Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. thanks
I appreciate the direction. I AM new to DU but enjoy watching the threads...I even got in trouble with class monitor for the first time today for calling Ann Coulter a bad name :-)
again, thanks and I shall watch for info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Motive?
*<http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/completetimeline/update3.html>



March 3, 1999: Andrew Krepinevich, Executive Director of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, before the Senate Armed Services Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities: "There appears to be general agreement concerning the need to transform the US military into a significantly different kind of force from that which emerged victorious from the Cold and Gulf Wars. Yet this verbal support has not been translated into a defense program supporting transformation ... the "critical mass" needed to effect it has not yet been achieved. One may conclude that, in the absence of a strong external shock to the United States - a latter-day "Pearl Harbor" of sorts - surmounting the barriers to transformation will likely prove a long, arduous process.

September, 2000: The neo-conservative think-tank Project for the New American Century writes a "blueprint" for the "creation of a 'global Pax Americana.'" The document, entitled Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategies, Forces And Resources For A New Century, was written for the Bush team even before the election for President took place. It was commissioned by future Vice President Cheney, future Defense Secretary Rumsfeld, future Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, Florida Governor and President Bush's brother Jeb Bush, and future Chief of Staff for Cheney Lewis Libby. The report calls itself a "blueprint for maintaining global US preeminence, precluding the rise of a great power rival, and shaping the international security order in line with American principles and interests." The plan shows Bush intended to take military control of Persian Gulf oil whether or not Saddam Hussein was in power and should retain control of the region even if there is no threat. It says: "The United States has for decades sought to play a more permanent role in Gulf regional security. While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein." The report calls for the control of space through a new "US Space Forces," the political control of the internet, the subversion of any growth in political power of even close allies, and advocates "regime change" in China, North Korea, Libya, Syria, Iran and others. It also mentions that "advanced forms of biological warfare that can 'target' specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool." A British Member of Parliament says of the report, "This is a blueprint for US world domination -- a new world order of their making. These are the thought processes of fantasist Americans who want to control the world."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ekaterina Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-03 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. my god
Thanks for the link and the snips. Like the manipulation of events surrounding Pearl Harbor, I suppose this will never see the light of day as a legitimate inquiry......and Bush and his fellow ideologues will have gotten away with mass murder of American civilians to further an evil empire. Truly depressing. But thanks for the info just the same.
e
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-03 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Welcome..
as soon as the "old DU" comes back as an archive, you will have soooooo many links to follow in the 9/11 forum.. People here have been analyzing that since day one..


Donm't worry about the "slap on the hands" we had all had pink hands from time to time :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC