The new Chrysler 200 Convertible: Like or Not?

[MrScorpio]

Poll question: The new Chrysler 200 Convertible: Like or Not?

It comes with a folding hardtop version too

[snooper2]

1. It's still the same Sebring with a more sexy body.....

So, it's still a POS


on edit:
Rumors have it, "new" 200 will have a totally new design and be based on a Fiat platform in 2-3 years...This is one reason they didn't spend the money to re-tool- which is why that horrible looking C-Pillar (from the Sebring) is still there :)

[NV Whino]

2. Guess I have to say I like it

only because it looks like my old Celica. Chrysler is a little behind the curve.

[EnviroBat]

3. I would not buy Chrysler junk if it was free...

Most "disposable" cars on the road.

[bluedigger]

4. The Lebaron is strong in this one...

[old mark]

5. I like what I see, but I want to see the side-it looks stubby in these pics...

I hope it's a runner...


mark

ADDED: http://www.caranddriver.com/news/car/10q3/2011_chrysler_200_to_replace_sebring_sedan-car_news


It has an optional 290 HP v-6 with 6 speed automatic trans...Why not a manual shift and tight suspension with that?


m

[Initech]

6. Never been a big convertible fan.

On the other hand I test drove a union-built 2011 Dodge Avenger last week. Not a bad car at all, but I also tested a Hyundai Sonata and liked that better.

[flvegan]

7. I do like the interior.

I'm not a big fan of Dodge/Chrysler/Plymouth, but that's a personal bias. I know you love your Sebring, so I think that if you're considering a 200, it's worth a test drive.

[MrScorpio]

8. I've also got a 99 Dodge Stratus that took a beating and keeps on ticking

This 200 ragtop is harkening back to my 2003 Sebring model.



Mopar should have skipped that '07-'10 chassis disaster and gone straight to the 200 model