 |
Latest | Greatest | Lobby | Journals | Search | Options | Help | Login |
|
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge |
|
Deja Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-18-09 07:43 PM Original message |
| So I've been watching the remastered Star Trek episodes... |
|
The visuals sometimes look 'flat', but even then it's what they do with the visuals that make them better than the original f/x.
This must be the first time they went back to the master 35mm negatives for remastering; the show has NEVER looked so clear, with THAT much detail. You can even see the join where Shatner's hairpiece begins! They overdid the contrasting a tad; some blacks are 'crushed' - subtle darker details don't seem to show up. Then again, I should calibrate my TV and re-check. Either way, it's not major and it beats the snot out of the previous releases, which lack deeper skin tone detail... Come March, I am so moving to blu-ray... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jb1mTPC1nQ8 http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film2/DVDReviews40/star_trek_season_two.htm http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film2/DVDReviews42/star_trek_season_three.htm   |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC
