Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What is the difference between "Rock" and "Rock & Roll"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-08 05:35 PM
Original message
What is the difference between "Rock" and "Rock & Roll"?
Edited on Fri Oct-17-08 05:36 PM by Dr Fate
I'll give it a shot:

Rock & Roll is youthful, primal, life-affirming & sexual. Rock & Roll can be loud,masculine & macho, but it doesnt always have to be. You dont have to have a record contract to play rock & roll- you just have to know what it is.

"Rock" is always macho & masculine. "Rock" doesnt have to sexual at all-just aggressive. It doesnt have to be youthful either- it can be a bunch of sweaty fat guys with long beards. You have to have a record contract and be played on a corporate radio station before anyone calls you "rock."

Anyway, it's Friday & I feel like splitting hairs....

Is there a difference between "Rock" and "Rock & Roll" or am I just being a music snob?

There are no wrong answers! Your take?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
StrongBad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-08 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. I have a different take
Rock n' Roll is heavily influenced by and can heavily mimic a typical blues-based I IV V progression. There can also be a heavy amount of country influence depending on the artist or context.

Rock, however has strong influece from folk and often deviates from the above structure, sometimes markedly. It often uses similar instumrents as Rock n' Roll i.e. guitars, bass, drums, and keyboards, but does not follow the traditionalist songwriting pattern of Rock n' Roll.

There's my take.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Not bad- seems to describe Rockabilly/Punk/Garage vs. Singer-Song-writer.
Edited on Fri Oct-17-08 05:43 PM by Dr Fate
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-08 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyskank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-08 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Backbeat.
Rock and roll has emphasis on the back beat: one TWO three FOUR. Rock has the emphasis more on the downbeat: ONE two THREE four.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Could you give me an example of a well-known "Rock" song with that beat?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyskank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-08 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Almost all of them.
Edited on Fri Oct-17-08 06:15 PM by billyskank
Take Paradise City by Guns 'n' Roses as an example. (I don't see Rabrrrrrr around, I think it's safe). Like practically all rock, it has heavy emphasis with bass drum on the first beat, and equal emphasis with snare on the third beat.

By contrast, old rock & roll songs (think Shake, Rattle and Roll, Rock Around The Clock, that sort of thing) would usually have snare drums emphasising the second and fourth 'back' beats giving it a light, bouncy feel, without much emphasis on the first and third 'down' beats.

That is my take on it, seen from the perspective of someone learning to dance the jive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-08 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Thanks- I like your explanation. n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-08 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. Rolling Stones = "Rock," Beatles = "Rock & Roll"
And my cutoff point for the Stones is "Exile on Main Street."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-08 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I would agree that some post Exile Stones should be called "Rock"...
...but I disagree that Beatles & Brian Jones era Stones are not both Rock & Roll...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. The Jones Stones drank from the same well as the Beatles, I agree...
...I think the difference is that Keith probably wanted "rock" and Mick wanted "rock & roll"...

The greatest Stones tracks are the ones reeking of attitude. "Rock" is attitude music. "Rock & Roll" is populist. In the tiny little window of the Mick Taylor Stones, they were a ROCK band. "Sticky Fingers" and "Exile" are probably two of the most dangerous albums ever released. With "Goats Head Soup," they were looking for a hit. With "Only Rock & Roll," they found it. Then Mick Taylor left the band, and the Stones spent their career up through the present as a "Rock & Roll" band.

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuskerDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
23. I think of it more as early Beatles = rock-n-roll, and post-
Revolver Beatles = rock music. To be fair, Let it Be contained some rock-n-roll.

I am very biased but if the Rolling Stones fart, I call it rock-n-roll. They have done wrong, but still can do no wrong in my book if that makes any sense!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-08 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. R&R = Melodic; can dance to; non-aggressive lyrics. Rock = Not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-08 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
12. this is a good question and great topic...
I think rock evolved out of rock and roll in the mid sixties with the introduction of external influences such as middle eastern music, atonality, folk, free form jazz, symphonic music...As youth culture embraced new experiences so did their music...


Parallels can possibly be seen in the transition from swing to bebop to freeform jazz, or r&b to soul to funk to hip-hop, I suppose...

Even the transition from baroque to classical to romantic to the twentieth century avant garde, for that matter...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. I agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-08 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
13. This:
Edited on Fri Oct-17-08 11:34 PM by enigmatic
Rock:



Rock N Roll:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dawgmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-08 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
14. Well...at the risk of being crude...
...I will give you the definition that an old bandmate once used.

Rock and Roll makes you want to dance.
Rock makes you want to fuck.
:blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. especially prog rock!
:)
Nobody could resist my Gentle Giant "Octopus" or "Free Hand" albums...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-08 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
15. It's attitude. Pure attitude.
Rock on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
18. Dr F: I respect your musical opinion, Question- I recently became
very interested in the Ramones, learned to play a lot of Johnny Ramone guitar, not as easy as it looks.
I find them a real mix of R&R and a little R.
Your opinion of the style and the Ramones perse?

Thanks - sorry if this is OT.

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. I'd say the Ramones are pure Rock 'n' Roll
I think they were a sort of revival of the music, which had been destroyed by "rock" for 5 - 10 years before they came around. And you're right about those Ramones guitar parts. I've played music forever, but just recently started playing guitar, and Johnny Ramone's parts are really tricky in a strange sort of way - all of that very fast shifting between different bar chords, muting/not muting, etc. I read an interview with him years ago, where he said that on recordings, he would overdub multiple guitar tracks, and then make a version of the song to play live that combined elements from those different parts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. I have been wtching old live Ramones performances on
Youtube...His hands are so fast you can't see them, many times faster than the studio recordings, and what he is playing is really fine work.
FWIW, Rolling Stone rated Johnny Ramone #16 in their all time guitarists list, right after Carlos Santana and before Jack White.

To me, they saved R&R from disco poisoning in the 1970's.

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. I never considered the Ramones to be rockandroll or rock...
but rather pop instead
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. I've never thought of "pop" as a genre
I just think "pop" means popular music.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. So do I, but "pop"practitioners would disagree with us
I consider all music available in the marketplace to be pop whether it's Brian Eno or Ornette Coleman or Britney Spears or whoever

When the Ramones started they considered The Bay City Rollers to be their peers/competition
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. He was still no Johnny Thunders or Steves Jones, though
Ramone's playing was somewhat...for lack of a better word...sexless...in comparison to those two
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RadiationTherapy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
19. What's the difference between Yang and Yin and Yang?
It lacks the flow. It lacks the roll. It's the drums without the dancing. Blecgh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
21. Jimmy Page killed Rock and Roll
That's how I see it. Rock and Roll is fun, accessible, proletarian music. The focus was on ensemble play (working within a certain style), song writing, and something that I think I would say involves something like "feeling" or "soul" over any kind of studio perfectionism. Rock and Roll, I guess, is a live music inspired by living folk traditions, where as Rock(!) is a studio-based music, brought to us by corporations for the purpose of generating profit. One is played in clubs, parties and dance halls, the other is played in stadiums, arenas, and - later in life - county fairs.

Wanking: Rock and Roll is not about wanking, Rock is. Great Rock and Roll (lead) guitarists: Chuck Berry, Bo Diddley, Brian Jones, Jimmie Hendrix, Syd Barrett, Mick Jones, Robert Smith, etc. - people who played exciting music which drove the songs, and were integral to them. Famous "ROCK" guitarists: Jimmy Page, Eddie Van Halen, whoever other shitty wanking guitarists are that are all about making some lame facial expression while they play a million notes a minute no matter what the song is. Amplification is also part of this. The Rock and Roll guitarist will play through an amp loud enough to get attention and make the music exciting. Rock guitarists will play through a stadium full of amplifiers loud enough to kill a duck at 500 yards.

The same could go for drummers. Great rock and roll drummer: Ringo Starr - ROCK drummer: Neil Pert.

Some notable artists in Rock and Roll: Elvis Presley, Johnny Cash, Cuck Berry, Bo Diddley, The Beatles, The Rolling Stones, Jimmie Hendrix, Pink Floyd (pre Dark Side of the Moon), The Ramones, The Clash, The Cure, My Bloody Valentine

Notable Rock people and things: stadiums, date-rape, Led Zeppelin, Fleetwood Mac, Bon Jovi, monster trucks, Van Halen, Pink Floyd (post Dark Side of the Moon), U2.

Also, one style has songs about wizards, dragons, viking gods, sex with groupies, and the troubles of being incredibly wealthy. I'll let you decide which that is.

Another important thing: Rock and Roll is enjoyed people the world over, regardless of religion, race, or creed. Rock is performed, and listened to, by white people, almost exclusively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bossy Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
22. One lives long, the other is here to stay, is loved by Joan Jett
and in its old-time form, liked by Bob Seger.

Rock is the generic term for nearly all of the pop music from about the mid-50s to the mid-80s. Rock-and-roll is the term for the same music but only through maybe the mid-60s. I don't really have the kind of ear to be able to discern the differences among backbeats, time signatures or minor chord use between, say, Chuck Berry and the Buffalo Springfield, but suspect that it was more a matter of critics, record labels, Billboard and especially the public generally becoming tired of adding the "& roll" when "rock" seemed to sum it up sufficiently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
25. I'm a fanatical psychobilly music fan and no one would ever call...
psychobilly...Rock...that I know for sure.


Tikki
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ivan Sputnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
26. The fifties and the sixties
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
31. Rockandroll has many fathers, but Bob Dylan invented rock music
Amazing that a folkie did that, but then again, he is Bob Dylan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC