Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A grammar cop came in to work

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 04:46 PM
Original message
A grammar cop came in to work
Today a British lady came into the office. She spoke in glowing terms of one article I wrote. Then she produced an article for the same paper that had tons of mistakes in it. The mistakes were my fault, the story wasn't proof read because in the run of things we forgot. But I noticed some of what she underlined was wrong and not mistakes at all. So I highlighted those and just mailed them off with this letter. - She's a nice lady and I hope she gets the joke.

Dear Mrs. ----

I do appreciate your critique of the crematorium article. As I said it certainly was embarrassing that something that terrible was published. But it does happen on occasion.

However, I noticed not all of what you pointed out was in fact a mistake by Canadian Press Standards. The highlighted areas are those which are correct.

In the first case either could be right. It is possible to use a comma in that case, but it is possible to use a period as well.

The second is "universe," it was spelled correctly so I assumed your problem was with the dash midway through. That is something the computer automatically does when a word won’t fit the line.

The third is the period after "St." While it is okay to use a comma after the period in the abbreviation, if it signifies the end of a sentence the period serves as both the end of the sentence and the end of the abbreviation.

The fourth is the phrase "in to." In the context in which I used it the spelling was correct. The compound use of "into" is only to be used when describing something changing. Example: I turned into a frog.

In the case above it is proper. But in my use the person was putting money "in to" a building making the two words separate.

Again thank you for pointing out the flaws. But as far as the total score goes it is 4-6 in your favour.

I was thinking of giving you more points for how many times urn and crematorium were mis-spelled, but then I realized they really are only one mistake.

Feel free to continue checking. As a cub reporter I appreciate the critique.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Very classy reaction
Its so rare these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. You're wrong on "in to"
you would still use "into" in that particular usage. You may be thinking of, "I went in to do some business".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC