Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How do you define what actually is art?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Archae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 02:45 AM
Original message
How do you define what actually is art?
I look at it this way.

Art is a creative expression, of talent.

Too many people don't do art.
They do a stunt.

About 30 years ago, I saw a guy who "painted," by standing behind a jet engine, and threw paint into the backwash.
That's a stunt.

A decade or so earlier, a guy did "art" by spreading globs of paint on a canvas, and then driving all over it.
That's a stunt.

More recently, that guy (Christo?) who wraps big stuff up in plastic, and had that ugly hanging cloth exibit in Central Park in NYC, he doesn't do art.
He does stunts.

Most recently, this idiot does "art" by getting lots of people to pose naked in different places, and he photographs it.
That's a stunt.

Van Gogh did art.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 04:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's what rich people are willing to pay for
It's what the "in crowd" says is art.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 04:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. If a human created it
And I find it interesting to perceive (look at, listen to, etc), it's art. You know, I find it interesting that "art" has only been created thus far for 3 of the 5 senses. I predict this will change in the relatively near future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyskank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 04:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. That's a very difficult question
For me, I like to see craft. I recognise that art and craft are not the same thing. A person may pile some bricks up in the Tate, and people call it art. I do not think I am qualified to judge; but I can say that it isn't my cup of tea. I like to see something that was difficult to do. I appreciate the craft that has gone into the execution. The reason I started drawing people was specifically because it was a challenge, and every time I do a new one, I strive to see how well I can do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ghostsofgiants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. I don't think difficulty of craft is particularly necessary though if the aesthetic is good.
Some of the nicest art I've seen has been very simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monk06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's art if the artist says it is - Marcel Duchamp
Edited on Sun Aug-19-07 05:52 AM by gbrooks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Archae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 06:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I disagree.
Good example:

"Piss Christ."

Some asshole pees into a plastic box, then dunks a plastic crucifix into the pee.

It's a stupid stunt, nowhere NEAR art.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 06:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. It's actually a pretty good photo...
And if it weren't for the "backstory" of how it was made and the title, people I don't think be upset about it at all.

I think it would have been more interesting for Cerrano to put the photo out as "untitled" for a while and see what the reaction was, THEN after a few years, announce how it was made and the actual title for it. Now, probably a LOT fewer people would have noticed the picture, but would have been a different sort of validation of the "is it art?" question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Archae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. From what I saw of the photo...
It's a shitty picture.

Any idiot can do a stupid picture like "Piss Christ."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Is this art?
Chris Ofili's painting "The Holy Virgin Mary"



Please note that the dark spots on the canvas are made of elephant dung.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
8. I used to pretend to understand art....
The fact is, I'm clueless. I like Van Gogh, though I don't know why. I was an English major, yet I feel the same way about poetry. Some poems give me goose bumps, but I don't know why. I guess it doesn't really matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cobalt1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. same here.
I tried to post about 3 replies to this thread and couldn't get a coherant sentence out.

I can't explain what it is, but I know it when I see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
10. For an interesting take, read Tom Wolf's "The Painted Word."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
11. It, in itself, is more important than anyone's opinion of it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
13. You ask me. I will tell you if it's art or craft or just lameness.
Cristo is art, by the way.

The other guys I don't know, since I don't know their intentions for using the jet engine or driving on the canvas - they might have had good artistic reasons for doing so.

Intentionality is a major component of what is art and what is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
14. Art is anything primarily intended to create an emotional reaction in the viewer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC