maveric
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 04:49 PM
Original message |
| Post a pic of your favorite American "Muscle Car". |
|
Mine is the 68 Shelby Cobra. 
|
-
67 GTO |
Maddy McCall |
Mar-11-06 04:54 PM |
#1 |
 -
Didnt that have a 442? |
maveric |
Mar-11-06 04:58 PM |
#3 |
  -
Actually, it think it was a choice between a 400 and a 421. |
flvegan |
Mar-11-06 05:02 PM |
#5 |
  -
400 V8. I think Pontiac started putting 442s in them in 68. |
Maddy McCall |
Mar-11-06 05:03 PM |
#6 |
  -
69 GTO |
maveric |
Mar-11-06 05:27 PM |
#30 |
  -
Over the years, the GTO was offered with 3 engines; a 389, a 400 & a 455 |
ReadTomPaine |
Mar-11-06 05:29 PM |
#31 |
 -
Thanks for the info. |
Maddy McCall |
Mar-11-06 05:35 PM |
#35 |
 -
You might be thinking of the Olds 442 |
Capn Sunshine |
Mar-11-06 05:56 PM |
#49 |
 -
That's not a car |
DS1 |
Mar-11-06 06:11 PM |
#59 |
-
1987 Grand National and the 1969 Yenko Camaro |
flvegan |
Mar-11-06 04:56 PM |
#2 |
 -
The Buick guys used to smoke the C4 Corvettes of the day at the ... |
ReadTomPaine |
Mar-11-06 05:42 PM |
#39 |
-
The T/A was faster and more nimble too. They used the GNX engine |
flvegan |
Mar-11-06 05:50 PM |
#43 |
 -
The FBI ordered a bunch as government cars in the day... |
ReadTomPaine |
Mar-11-06 05:53 PM |
#45 |
-
In 1987, Car and Driver called it "the car Darth Vader would drive" |
flvegan |
Mar-11-06 05:54 PM |
#48 |
-
I have that issue, actually! |
ReadTomPaine |
Mar-11-06 06:02 PM |
#52 |
-
The engine is bulletproof. |
flvegan |
Mar-11-06 06:08 PM |
#57 |
-
The N/A ones I've driven are really strong right off the line... |
ReadTomPaine |
Mar-11-06 06:23 PM |
#63 |
-
For you Buick lovers. The 56. |
maveric |
Mar-11-06 06:33 PM |
#65 |
-
'74 Pinto Squire with Rally Wheels and Wood Paneling |
Rabrrrrrr |
Mar-11-06 05:01 PM |
#4 |
 -
Exploding gas tank and all. |
maveric |
Mar-11-06 05:05 PM |
#8 |
 -
My 'rents had one when I was a kid |
LeftyMom |
Mar-11-06 05:07 PM |
#10 |
 -
Of course there is, and I owned one back in the day. Aaah, memories... |
blondeatlast |
Mar-11-06 05:25 PM |
#29 |
-
Here's what I drive now. |
maveric |
Mar-11-06 05:03 PM |
#7 |
 -
NIIICE. |
Maddy McCall |
Mar-11-06 05:05 PM |
#9 |
  -
Mine is a 5-speed so my mileage isnt too bad. |
maveric |
Mar-11-06 05:10 PM |
#13 |
 -
Yes, they do look retro. |
Maddy McCall |
Mar-11-06 05:14 PM |
#17 |
 -
Oh, you bastard! I'm stuck with a 2003. |
Rabrrrrrr |
Mar-11-06 05:08 PM |
#12 |
 -
How is the low end torque on the new 4.6? |
ReadTomPaine |
Mar-11-06 05:57 PM |
#51 |
-
Mine's not too bad off the line. It could be faster IMHO. |
maveric |
Mar-11-06 06:08 PM |
#56 |
-
How about a 69 Chevelle SS? |
maveric |
Mar-11-06 05:07 PM |
#11 |
 -
1969 had the 454, and 1970 went to the 496 |
flvegan |
Mar-11-06 05:11 PM |
#15 |
-
here's mine... |
bridgit |
Mar-11-06 05:10 PM |
#14 |
 -
WOW! That top one is awesome! What is it? |
maveric |
Mar-11-06 05:11 PM |
#16 |
-
Chrysler 300, my dad left me one, i still have it in storage... |
bridgit |
Mar-11-06 05:14 PM |
#18 |
-
Hold on to that one. |
maveric |
Mar-11-06 05:16 PM |
#21 |
-
needs new upholstery, and the rubber products: belts, hoses, that... |
bridgit |
Mar-11-06 05:19 PM |
#23 |
-
Wow, a 300 with a Hemi is a true gold chip car... |
ReadTomPaine |
Mar-11-06 05:39 PM |
#38 |
-
Here'a a 69 Nova SS. 460. |
maveric |
Mar-11-06 05:15 PM |
#19 |
-
1962 Corvette |
Blue Belle |
Mar-11-06 05:16 PM |
#20 |
 -
A friend had a 60 Vet. The Black & White model. |
maveric |
Mar-11-06 05:18 PM |
#22 |
-
My boyfriends is just like the one I posted... |
Blue Belle |
Mar-11-06 05:19 PM |
#26 |
-
My Uncle had a 68 Shelby when I was a kid... |
dicksteele |
Mar-11-06 05:19 PM |
#24 |
-
Another 2: 1973 Detomaso Pantera and the 67 Corvette 427 |
flvegan |
Mar-11-06 05:19 PM |
#25 |
 -
'67 Corvette |
lizziegrace |
Mar-11-06 05:21 PM |
#27 |
 -
The '67s had that great two tone hood... |
ReadTomPaine |
Mar-11-06 06:10 PM |
#58 |
-
Actually, that one is an '80 or an '81 |
flvegan |
Mar-11-06 07:01 PM |
#75 |
-
Yep, it was the best shot of the body style I could find quickly! |
ReadTomPaine |
Mar-11-06 07:03 PM |
#77 |
-
Actually, the '80 was a great car. |
flvegan |
Mar-11-06 07:17 PM |
#80 |
-
They are pretty inexpensive these days for a used Corvette as well. |
ReadTomPaine |
Mar-11-06 07:19 PM |
#81 |
-
As I told friends of mine at the time |
flvegan |
Mar-11-06 07:24 PM |
#82 |
-
Heh. I used to have a '69 Stingray. |
Spider Jerusalem |
Mar-11-06 07:49 PM |
#84 |
-
A '69? What was under the hood? |
flvegan |
Mar-11-06 08:05 PM |
#85 |
-
427? |
maveric |
Mar-11-06 08:14 PM |
#86 |
-
350, ported heads, mildly stroked (to 377)... |
Spider Jerusalem |
Mar-11-06 08:40 PM |
#89 |
-
When it comes to this era, I prefer Mopar... |
ReadTomPaine |
Mar-11-06 05:24 PM |
#28 |
-
71 Camaro 402. |
maveric |
Mar-11-06 05:30 PM |
#32 |
 -
I love the split bumper 1970 Camaros.. |
ReadTomPaine |
Mar-11-06 05:34 PM |
#34 |
-
Remember this beast? 1967 Dodge Charger. |
maveric |
Mar-11-06 05:34 PM |
#33 |
 -
I prefer the later ones - 68 & 69... tho by 1970 they lost a lot of charm. |
ReadTomPaine |
Mar-11-06 05:37 PM |
#36 |
  -
Hudson Hornet |
yorgatron |
Mar-11-06 05:38 PM |
#37 |
 -
I *love* the interior... |
ReadTomPaine |
Mar-11-06 05:51 PM |
#44 |
 -
And the 1970 Dodge Challenger. |
maveric |
Mar-11-06 06:07 PM |
#55 |
-
Nice shot! Never saw one in metallic blue before... |
ReadTomPaine |
Mar-11-06 06:13 PM |
#60 |
-
Don't know if this counts as a muscle car ... |
TheBaldyMan |
Mar-11-06 05:43 PM |
#40 |
 -
Recent reunion shot of GT40's... |
ReadTomPaine |
Mar-11-06 05:48 PM |
#42 |
-
The new one is a beast. |
flvegan |
Mar-11-06 05:53 PM |
#46 |
 -
I dunno, that was the GT40's beauty, it was a muscle car that could handle |
TheBaldyMan |
Mar-11-06 05:57 PM |
#50 |
-
Big difference, though. |
flvegan |
Mar-11-06 06:06 PM |
#54 |
-
I would have loved to have been deafened by that lot. |
TheBaldyMan |
Mar-11-06 05:54 PM |
#47 |
-
The dollar value in that photo tallies like a Defense Dept. budget sheet! |
ReadTomPaine |
Mar-11-06 06:05 PM |
#53 |
-
1970 "Mickey Thompson" Trans Am. |
maveric |
Mar-11-06 05:46 PM |
#41 |
-
'68 Corvette L-88 |
Capn Sunshine |
Mar-11-06 06:14 PM |
#61 |
 -
Great shots! |
ReadTomPaine |
Mar-11-06 06:17 PM |
#62 |
-
I just had to post this one again. Oh so beautiful! |
maveric |
Mar-11-06 06:29 PM |
#64 |
 -
Is that Eleanor? |
ReadTomPaine |
Mar-11-06 06:42 PM |
#66 |
-
Her name could be Priscilla for all I care. I LOVE this car! |
maveric |
Mar-11-06 06:44 PM |
#68 |
-
"Eleanor " resides in Santa Barbara |
Capn Sunshine |
Mar-11-06 06:49 PM |
#70 |
 -
There's a cottage industry selling replicas of that car.. |
ReadTomPaine |
Mar-11-06 07:06 PM |
#78 |
-
"Eleanor" was the name of the Mustang from "Gone in 60 Seconds" |
ReadTomPaine |
Mar-11-06 07:02 PM |
#76 |
-
I really like the 66 |
Capn Sunshine |
Mar-11-06 06:43 PM |
#67 |
 -
Yes that's what the "H" is for on the side of the car in the second photo. |
ReadTomPaine |
Mar-11-06 06:48 PM |
#69 |
 -
Here's a 2007 Shelby SVT Cobra. |
maveric |
Mar-11-06 06:49 PM |
#71 |
-
oooooh....Cobra |
Capn Sunshine |
Mar-11-06 07:36 PM |
#83 |
-
Toss up |
DainBramaged |
Mar-11-06 06:50 PM |
#72 |
-
Here's one you might not have ever seen... |
flvegan |
Mar-11-06 06:52 PM |
#73 |
 -
Vector, such a troubled story |
DainBramaged |
Mar-11-06 06:58 PM |
#74 |
 -
"Automobile" magazine did a piece on these about a year or so ago.. |
ReadTomPaine |
Mar-11-06 07:15 PM |
#79 |
-
The original, and still the champeen |
Oeditpus Rex |
Mar-11-06 08:16 PM |
#87 |
-
Do NOT get me started on the wheel issue. |
flvegan |
Mar-11-06 08:26 PM |
#88 |
Maddy McCall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 04:54 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Look at this cherry. I'm salivating. 
|
maveric
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 3. Didnt that have a 442? |
|
A friend of mine had a 69 and he would race it at New England Dragway. The dude had some trophies! But then drugs took him over and he sold that wonderful machine for peanuts. So sad!
|
flvegan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 5. Actually, it think it was a choice between a 400 and a 421. |
|
The 421 was overbored to an odd number, like 428 (rather than 427).
I think...
|
Maddy McCall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 6. 400 V8. I think Pontiac started putting 442s in them in 68. |
|
My friend in high school had one...not a convertible...wrecked it. So his dad bought him a 69, which did have a 442. Wrecked it. So his dad bought him ANOTHER one, and he wrecked it, too.
I cried not for him, but for the loss of those beautiful cars. In case it's not obvious, he was a spoiled, careless brat. He's still irresponsible, but his parents no longer support his irresponsibility.
|
maveric
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
ReadTomPaine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 31. Over the years, the GTO was offered with 3 engines; a 389, a 400 & a 455 |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-11-06 05:37 PM by ReadTomPaine
The best was the 400 Ram Air with the Bobcat option. My fave GTOs are these models: 
|
Maddy McCall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
Capn Sunshine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
| 49. You might be thinking of the Olds 442 |
|
which was the sister to the GTO 
|
DS1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
It's a rocket with a passenger compartment attached at the last minute 
|
flvegan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 04:56 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. 1987 Grand National and the 1969 Yenko Camaro |
|
I owned one of these:  I'll never be able to own one of these, but I saw one on a hauler the other day: 
|
ReadTomPaine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 39. The Buick guys used to smoke the C4 Corvettes of the day at the ... |
|
GM testing grounds with the GNX's .. Pontiac made a version of the Trans Am with that engine, but only for a single year as they had ego problems putting a Buick engine in their baby. 1989 Trans Am GTA w Buick Turbo V6 
|
flvegan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #39 |
| 43. The T/A was faster and more nimble too. They used the GNX engine |
|
in that one. Pace Car, too, as I recall.
I smoked a Ferrari Testarossa in mine. Granted, if we went top speed, or hit the curves, I'd be done. But, in a straight line...he looked pretty dumb, albeit in a very pretty car.
|
ReadTomPaine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #43 |
| 45. The FBI ordered a bunch as government cars in the day... |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-11-06 05:53 PM by ReadTomPaine
Now that is one car you don't want to have tailing you! 
|
flvegan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #45 |
| 48. In 1987, Car and Driver called it "the car Darth Vader would drive" |
|
And I would have to agree. Maintenance/warranty nightmares, though. Big reason they were discontinued.
|
ReadTomPaine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #48 |
| 52. I have that issue, actually! |
|
My C/D and R&T collections run back to around 1974, with some gaps  Never having owned one, it's ashame to hear about the warranty problems. That 3800 V6 is usually known for it's toughness, and it's still in wide use as GM's premier midsize engine, tho I believe they just supercharge it these days. 
|
flvegan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #52 |
| 57. The engine is bulletproof. |
|
The failures are in the turbo and the tranny. For one, the turbo would blow seals like crazy, and the hoses, if you didn't upgrade, were worthless. The transmission wasn't beefed up to handle the torque, so they went pretty quickly, as well.
Never heard of head gaskets going, ring failure, nothing.
I loved mine, and I still miss her.
|
ReadTomPaine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #57 |
| 63. The N/A ones I've driven are really strong right off the line... |
|
They lose steam in the upper RPM areas, but they pull like a V8 at first. Forced induction seems a perfect fit to that engine.
|
maveric
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #39 |
| 65. For you Buick lovers. The 56. |
Rabrrrrrr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:01 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. '74 Pinto Squire with Rally Wheels and Wood Paneling |
|
Seriously, is there anything hotter or more muscular? 
|
maveric
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 8. Exploding gas tank and all. |
|
My Ma had a 71 Pinto and it was such a POS.
|
LeftyMom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 10. My 'rents had one when I was a kid |
|
The only nice thing I can say about it is that it was slightly more reliable than thier other car, an AMC Javelin.
|
blondeatlast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 29. Of course there is, and I owned one back in the day. Aaah, memories... |
|
 I've since moved to this--can't be bothered to drive myself now:  (Both are from the movie Wayne's World and from here: http://www.amcpacer.com
|
maveric
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:03 PM
Response to Original message |
| 7. Here's what I drive now. |
|
 Its pretty close to Muscle Car status. 2006 Mustang GT. 4.6L.
|
Maddy McCall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
My best friend had a Mustang, but she said the gas mileage was terrible. (Are you seeing this, too?) So she sold the Mustang and bought a freakin' Explorer. Hmm. Let's see. Which would I rather have? A fine-ass Mustang or a Shitbox? I'd go for the Mustang everytime.  NICE CAR.
|
maveric
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 13. Mine is a 5-speed so my mileage isnt too bad. |
|
26 on the highway and about 17 in town. I love the retro style and the low to the ground look that makes cornering superb. Last December, after I bought my Stang, I took a cruise up CA HWY1. Ohh Baby! What a fun ride that was!
|
Maddy McCall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
| 17. Yes, they do look retro. |
|
I bet that was a fun trip. I'd love to do something like that after I buy my next vehicle, which is looking like it's going to be a Subaru Baja.
|
Rabrrrrrr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
| 12. Oh, you bastard! I'm stuck with a 2003. |
|
I won't be getting the new style Mustang until I can buy a used one. DAMN nice looking Mustangs! I love the new style. I especially love the look of the convertible ones.
|
ReadTomPaine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
| 51. How is the low end torque on the new 4.6? |
|
I recall driving an older one years ago, and tho it's a sweet engine, it seems a touch soft off the line compared to the Chevy LS1 & LT1.
Ford has a read winner in this new Mustang... it's one sweet ride.
|
maveric
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #51 |
| 56. Mine's not too bad off the line. It could be faster IMHO. |
|
But once you bang it into 3rd, your gone!
|
maveric
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:07 PM
Response to Original message |
| 11. How about a 69 Chevelle SS? |
flvegan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
| 15. 1969 had the 454, and 1970 went to the 496 |
|
Something like 600 horsepower. The LS6 and LS7 creations won't even be owned up to as having been sold.
Crazy fast.
|
bridgit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:10 PM
Response to Original message |
|
 and hubby's, he was raised with race cars so... 
|
maveric
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
| 16. WOW! That top one is awesome! What is it? |
bridgit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
| 18. Chrysler 300, my dad left me one, i still have it in storage... |
|
 the bottom one is a 300 also, just updated
|
maveric
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
bridgit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
| 23. needs new upholstery, and the rubber products: belts, hoses, that... |
|
stuff from being in storage but the rest of it is all there = 392 hemi = hauls ass; oh, and a new rag-top 
|
ReadTomPaine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
| 38. Wow, a 300 with a Hemi is a true gold chip car... |
|
Congrats. That's a nice piece of automotive history you've got there.
|
maveric
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:15 PM
Response to Original message |
| 19. Here'a a 69 Nova SS. 460. |
|
 This one also "Screamed"!
|
Blue Belle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:16 PM
Response to Original message |
|
This pic was taken from an old brochure: 
|
maveric
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
| 22. A friend had a 60 Vet. The Black & White model. |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-11-06 05:20 PM by maveric
on edit to add pic: We went stoner cruising one night and he took it up to 140 mph. Scared the shit out of me. It looked just like this one. 
|
Blue Belle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
| 26. My boyfriends is just like the one I posted... |
|
although it needs a little work done to it. He's had it sitting in storage too long.
|
Richard Steele
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:19 PM
Response to Original message |
| 24. My Uncle had a 68 Shelby when I was a kid... |
|
That's totally a classic! My dad's side of the family are definitely FORD people; so small wonder that THIS is my dream car: 
|
flvegan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:19 PM
Response to Original message |
| 25. Another 2: 1973 Detomaso Pantera and the 67 Corvette 427 |
|
Technically, it IS a Ford. I'm ballparking the year, too.  And with an understated 435 horsepower... 
|
lizziegrace
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
|
My father has that car - Lynndale Blue with sidepipes. I've only driven it once. Sigh...
|
ReadTomPaine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
| 58. The '67s had that great two tone hood... |
|
Tho - and this is one of my irrational automotive guilty pleasures, I love the late 1970's C3 Corvettes the best.  Yes I know, worst Corvette ever made! I just love the way they look, what can I say!
|
flvegan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #58 |
| 75. Actually, that one is an '80 or an '81 |
|
The late 70's had the spoilerless back end, and the rubber front bumpers. It's not an L-82, as it lacks the fender badges. If it were more close up, I could tell you. Looks like silver around the crossed flags mark, which would make it an '80. I don't see a "Cross-Fire Injection" on the fender, so it's not an '82.
I had an '80, black on black, auto, L-48. I was a Vette afficionado at one point. It takes up a lot of brain cells now.
|
ReadTomPaine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #75 |
| 77. Yep, it was the best shot of the body style I could find quickly! |
|
I'd take any late C3 really. I love those cars, even tho I should know better....
|
flvegan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #77 |
| 80. Actually, the '80 was a great car. |
|
Dana rear end, TH350 was already beefy, no computer, 4 wheel discs, tilt/tele, etc. All it needed was some extra horsepower. Easily added by swapping heads, manifold and carb, and letting the exhaust open up (Flowmasters or Borla, headers). Let her breathe, and she'll fly.
By the time I was half done, my bad girl was in the 12's in the 1/4, street legal and passed Massachusetts emissions. Probably cost me $3000.00 to get there.
|
ReadTomPaine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #80 |
| 81. They are pretty inexpensive these days for a used Corvette as well. |
|
You're sorely tempting me LOL.
Park one of these next to a 911 and no one would look twice at the Porsche. They have amazing presence, even today.
|
flvegan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #81 |
| 82. As I told friends of mine at the time |
|
that were into the 5.0 Stangs at the time...
My Vette has curves like a woman, as she should. You drive a box.
The 911 is a fine vehicle, but will never escape two things:
1. VW Bug heritage (shape, etc) 2. You have to drive that car like you hate her.
|
Spider Jerusalem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #82 |
| 84. Heh. I used to have a '69 Stingray. |
|
Whenever I found myself next to a Mustang GT at a stoplight, they ALWAYS wanted to race. And they always found out that the combination of more torque, more horsepower, lower weight and positraction meant they got smoked by a nearly 30-year-old car. 
|
flvegan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #84 |
| 85. A '69? What was under the hood? |
|
Not that it really matters. In that day, even the base engine would sully a 5.0, and I've owned 2 5.0 myself...
|
maveric
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #85 |
Spider Jerusalem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #85 |
| 89. 350, ported heads, mildly stroked (to 377)... |
|
high-flow Quadrajet carb and polished intake. Not too modified from stock, but it had enough power (especially with the low-end torque) to make going up against even one of the early 4.6 Mustangs not much of a race.
|
ReadTomPaine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:24 PM
Response to Original message |
| 28. When it comes to this era, I prefer Mopar... |
maveric
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:30 PM
Response to Original message |
ReadTomPaine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
| 34. I love the split bumper 1970 Camaros.. |
|
I think they are the one of the best looking variants of the model, very under appreciated. The styling seems almost Jaguar/Aston inspired. 
|
maveric
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:34 PM
Response to Original message |
| 33. Remember this beast? 1967 Dodge Charger. |
ReadTomPaine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #33 |
| 36. I prefer the later ones - 68 & 69... tho by 1970 they lost a lot of charm. |
|
But those early ones do have more of a retro charm, I'd agree... '69 front fascia 
|
yorgatron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #36 |
ReadTomPaine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #37 |
| 44. I *love* the interior... |
maveric
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #33 |
| 55. And the 1970 Dodge Challenger. |
ReadTomPaine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #55 |
| 60. Nice shot! Never saw one in metallic blue before... |
|
I like the 'Cuda a little more, but it's really splitting hairs since they are virtually identical. I think the 'Cudas were a little faster, and the Challengers were a little more comfortable. That new Challenger Dodge is considering looks very interesting. 
|
TheBaldyMan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:43 PM
Response to Original message |
| 40. Don't know if this counts as a muscle car ... |
|
but in my book it is the only american sports car ever produced  The Ford GT40 - Daytona, 1965
|
ReadTomPaine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #40 |
| 42. Recent reunion shot of GT40's... |
|
 The new one is pretty nice, also... 
|
flvegan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #42 |
| 46. The new one is a beast. |
|
Sure, it'll get eaten by some of the German/Italian exotica, but 11 sec 1/4 times are very nice.
|
TheBaldyMan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #46 |
| 50. I dunno, that was the GT40's beauty, it was a muscle car that could handle |
|
It wiped the floor with the opposition when it came out, years ahead of its time and stunning to look at. The new GT40 should do OK if it inherits the handling of its predecessor.
|
flvegan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #50 |
| 54. Big difference, though. |
|
The original, you're talking a race car. The few production models weren't that incredible. Excellent, yes, but even the Shelby AC Cobra could post the same numbers. I won't even get into the Corvette Grand Sports. The new one is a production car.
|
TheBaldyMan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #42 |
| 47. I would have loved to have been deafened by that lot. |
|
I've only seen two ever and they make an unholy sound.
|
ReadTomPaine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #47 |
| 53. The dollar value in that photo tallies like a Defense Dept. budget sheet! |
|
Neat GT40 site: http://www.gt40.org.uk / Tho given your preferences, you've probably read most of what's there!
|
maveric
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 05:46 PM
Response to Original message |
| 41. 1970 "Mickey Thompson" Trans Am. |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-11-06 05:50 PM by maveric
|
Capn Sunshine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 06:14 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-11-06 06:15 PM by Capn Sunshine
 Fastest of the Sixties muscle cars that required no mods to win at the strip. Also, my Favorite all-time Corvette (but impractical due to its 2.1+mill price tag- there are like five surviving cars) 63 Grand Sport Nassau This is a quality replica:   Thanks to the dedication of a few very serious collectors, all five of the original Grand Sport Corvettes still exist to this day (the photo shows their historic reunion at the 2003 Amelia Island Concours D'Elegance 
|
ReadTomPaine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #61 |
maveric
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 06:29 PM
Response to Original message |
| 64. I just had to post this one again. Oh so beautiful! |
ReadTomPaine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #64 |
maveric
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #66 |
| 68. Her name could be Priscilla for all I care. I LOVE this car! |
|
Living in SoCal you still get to see a few of these on the road.
|
Capn Sunshine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #68 |
| 70. "Eleanor " resides in Santa Barbara |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-11-06 06:49 PM by Capn Sunshine
That was the Shelby used in "Gone In Sixty Seconds" and I'm pretty sure a collector in Montecito bought her ar Barrett-Jackson last year; at least I see an identical car to that on the road up here; that one in the pic could be her or is a great interpretation of the same...
|
ReadTomPaine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #70 |
| 78. There's a cottage industry selling replicas of that car.. |
ReadTomPaine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #68 |
| 76. "Eleanor" was the name of the Mustang from "Gone in 60 Seconds" |
|
Both the original and the remake of the movie - that style (with the shaved bumpers, graphite grey paint, billet grill, foglights etc) is the one they used for the later film. The original featured a '74 I think And you're right, it's one of the slickest variants they ever produced... Orignal poster:  PR shot of Nick Cage leaning on the car from the remake 
|
Capn Sunshine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 06:43 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-11-06 06:46 PM by Capn Sunshine
Partly because it wasn't as "together" as the 67- the genuine Shelbys all have these kind of decrepit hoods where the fiberglass was kind of wavy, and a few other details, but it was just oh-so-hot in it's day, and 66 was a good year for me. So I'm endeared to that year's cars  But there was also the HERTZ model Shelby -with an automatic! and special black paint with gold stripes that they actually RENTED back then: 
|
ReadTomPaine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #67 |
| 69. Yes that's what the "H" is for on the side of the car in the second photo. |
|
People used to rent them, race them, and then wash them off and bring them back! No wonder Hertz didn't try anything like that again for decades! 
|
maveric
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #67 |
| 71. Here's a 2007 Shelby SVT Cobra. |
|
In a Homer Simpson voice: "OOOOO, Cobra!" 
|
Capn Sunshine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #71 |
DainBramaged
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 06:50 PM
Response to Original message |
flvegan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 06:52 PM
Response to Original message |
| 73. Here's one you might not have ever seen... |
|
The Vector W2 TwinTurbo Even today, would still take the milk money of Lambos and Ferraris... 
|
DainBramaged
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #73 |
| 74. Vector, such a troubled story |
|
the Big Block car would have been amazing. The small block turbo before Vortec heads was amazing in itself.
|
ReadTomPaine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #73 |
| 79. "Automobile" magazine did a piece on these about a year or so ago.. |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-11-06 07:17 PM by ReadTomPaine
Seems the few that were delivered are still cherished by their owners and driven regularly. They are serviced by a few of the old company principles who make themselves available to the remaining owners for resources like parts, repairs, special fabrication info etc. These cars were almost entirely made with aviation style technology and materials, if memory serves.
|
Oeditpus Rex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 08:16 PM
Response to Original message |
| 87. The original, and still the champeen |
|
1964 Pontiac GTO.   But why, why, why do so many people put "modern" wheels on classic cars? It ruins the whole look. 
|
flvegan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-11-06 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #87 |
| 88. Do NOT get me started on the wheel issue. |
|
If I see one more 60's era Stang with American Racing's on her, I'm gonna hurl.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 22nd 2013, 12:05 PM
Response to Original message |