Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This name above the title means it's a BAD movie

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Bossy Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 01:32 PM
Original message
This name above the title means it's a BAD movie
I gotta go with Richard Grieco, but I'll listen to other arguments. Remember: directors' names are also often above the title, so if you want to go with Baz Luhrman (or correct my spelling or same), say, I wouldn't argue too strenuously against. A poll may result if this goes anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. In MY opinion:...Jim Carrey
He's just not funny..obnoxious maybe, but not funny
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. That Would Be High On My List
I have never laughed at anything he's done. Never! I just don't find him the least bit amusing. And, in movies he's an overactor in the Sally Field/Lenny DiCaprio class.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigMcLargehuge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Directed by Uwe Boll
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lavender Brown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Michael Bay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ghostsofgiants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I like the way you think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
41. Yep.
I usually won't even consider a Bay film.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. Directed by Stanley Kubrick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ghostsofgiants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. You really need to look up "bad" in the dictionary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. You're right. Kubrick defines "overrated".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ghostsofgiants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Possibly...
But his films were VERY far from bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. See, I don't agree with that.
I think he did his best to fuck up some otherwise good movies. He absolutely ruins plots by trying too hard to prove his own genius. Full Metal Jacket would be good, if it weren't in fact two entirely separate short movies that are arbitrarily connected, one of which (the second half) could've been reduced by about 20 minutes, easily. He fucked up A Clockwork Orange by ignoring hugely important points, like how he fails to depict the main character's actions as being extraordinarily evil by giving the distinct impression that everyone was pretty bad, which he does intentionally because he tries way too hard to make the point that everyone is depraved and in doing so fucks up his own point. The Shining I place more fault on King's head than Kubrick's, but as a very avid horror film viewer, this movie did neither of the things that make horror movies great (which is to simultaneously make a social statement while scaring the shit out of you). I will give him credit for Dr. Strangelove - that was a good movie - and I admit I haven't seen 2001: A Space Odysee, but I can hardly bestow genius status for a director who does little more than create archetypal characters with no real depth (which he does for ALL of the aforementioned films) that dumb down the movie and destroy its plot's coherency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ghostsofgiants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. We're clearly not going to agree on this...
Because I love all of those films (The Shining especially).

And why does a horror film have to make a social statement? I mean, I appreciate anything that makes a social statement, but why is it necessary for a horror film to do so to be great?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. It's just one of those things that separates classics from everything else
It's one of the major traditional factors that separates horror classics, like Frankenstein and Night of the Living Dead, from pedestrian stories like Friday the 13th. Any good work of literature or film should do more than merely tell a story. For the horror genre, an underlying social statement is traditionally what defines a classic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkey see Monkey Do Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #19
34. FYI - an article arguing that "The Shining" is about the genocide
of Native Americans:

The Family of Man by Bill Blakemore
http://www.visual-memory.co.uk/amk/doc/0052.html

It fails to convince me, although the inserted lines about the hotel being built on an Indian burial ground (and the builders having to repel attacks) are curious. I'm suprised that he doesn't mention this line Jack speaks to the bartender: "You set 'em up and I'll knock 'em back, Lloyd, one by one. White man's burden, Lloyd, white man's burden."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. I don't find that to be very compelling either.
It absolutely lost me with the stretch about the "racist" murders. The chef wasn't killed because he was black. He got killed because he got in the way. And said killing had to be one of the most atrociously anti-climactic things I've seen on film, now that you mention it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #19
38. I was talking about Kubrick last night
and many of his movies are set IN a time, but are nevertheless timeless, such as The Shining and Dr. Strangelove. That to me defines truly great filmmaking.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverpatronus Donating Member (520 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #11
37. word.
people kept telling me i HAD to watch some kubrick. so i did and JEEZ those are HOURS of my life that i'll just never get back. overrated hack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigMcLargehuge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. From the producers of Mortal Kombat and Super Mario Brothers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bossy Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. I always love "From one of the producers of...," usually followed
by an Adam Sandler title. Almost always on a direct to video release, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ghostsofgiants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. Michael Bay
Edited on Thu Jan-05-06 02:19 PM by primate1
Or M. Night Shyamalan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Is Write Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. Mariah Carey
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPisEvil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. Steven Seagal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. No! Absolutely Not!
Seagal is good for what it is. I watch those movies for stuff blowing up, people getting a butt-kicking, and the bad guys getting their's. And, he's a liberal. So, making fun of Steve is not acceptable.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPisEvil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. I can see that. As schlock it's adequate.
Plus watching him run is hysterical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Well, Since He Got Fat, Yes!
But, i like shoot 'em up stuff. It's brain candy!
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobo_baggins Donating Member (754 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. liberal or not, his movies suck
hes good at what he does, which is make terrible movies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. You're Violating The Rule
Don't make me come over there young man!
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitchenWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
12. Pauly Shore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RockaFowler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Pauly Shore - now that is bad
I don't think he has starred in a Good Movie yet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kick-ass-bob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
17. Slyvester Stallone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
20. Stephen Baldwin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
21. Was Michael Ironside In The Film?
http://ruthlessreviews.com/80saction/mcbain.php

One of the all time great movie reviews

Michael Ironside
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rob H. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
22. Kevin Costner
Seriously, how (and more importantly, why) is this walking block of wood still allowed to appear on film?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
24. Jean Claude Van Damme
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mad_Dem_X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
26. Sylvester Stallone and
Freddie Prinze, Jr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divameow77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
29. Jessica Simpson
for starters...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
30. Carrot Top
Edited on Thu Jan-05-06 03:32 PM by ET Awful
Well, there was that one "movie" (for lack of a better term). I personally never expended the minimal cranial energy required to watch it, but I am aware of it's existence.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
31. Any movie whose title begins "Earnest goes to"
Yeah, I moved it from my first post because Earnest deserved his own :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
33. National Lampoon's
God Awful Bullshit on Film, Part 16
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
39. Aaaaah-nold
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
40. Alan Smithee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildEyedLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 04:18 AM
Response to Original message
42. Adam Sandler
He's just not funny, at all, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qanisqineq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
43. Jennifer Lopez
I think she is a terrible actress and don't understand why they keep giving her movie roles. If it's her looks, there are plenty of more beautiful women that can act better than J-Lo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevCheesehead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 04:30 AM
Response to Original message
44. "John Carpenter's....."
The only exception, perhaps, being Starman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 06:09 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. I don't know, "The Thing" was pretty cool.
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rob H. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. "John Carpenter's 'The Thing'"
...is one of my all-time favorite sci-fi movies. It's also held up remarkably well, given that it'll be 25 years old next year. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WernhamHogg Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
46. Anyone from the cast of Friends who is NOT named Lisa Kudrow n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom_Foolery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
48. Matthew Mconahey . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC