Several months ago, my uncle passed away. My uncle was a great man who we all loved, and he enjoyed sitting around telling us war stories from his days in Vietnam when he was a gunner on the side of a Cavalry helicopter. I grew up thinking that he was some kind of war hero, and was somewhat dissappointed when I found out that lots of people fought in wars. Still, his stories were inspiring, and some of his acts of courage saved peoples lives.
Or so we thought. My cousin is the annointed "keeper of family lore", and the one who maintains the family tree and all of that kind of stuff. After my uncle died (not her father btw, he was her uncle too), she began looking up information on his service for her geneaology scrapbooks for the family. She was especially curious as to why he'd never received any awards for bravery. What she found was a sad truth...my uncle was actually a clerk in a supply unit, and the closest he came to combat was when he handled the boxes of ammo that were going to the battlefield. I can only imagine what drove him to make up those stories, but he made them believable for many decades and nobody ever had any reason to question them.
My question may be obvious at this point. My cousin brought this information to me (in tears) because she isn't sure whether or not she should let the rest of the family know. On one hand, she wants her family history to be an accurate reflection of his life, but on the other hand she doesn't want to destroy the families illusions of him and make people think poorly of him. He's dead, and she doesn't want to tarnish his memory.
Tell, or no?
| Poll result (12 votes) |
| Tell | (1 votes, 8%) | Vote |
| Don't Tell | (11 votes, 92%) | Vote |
| Other. | (0 votes, 0%) | Vote |