Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What is the difference between "creationism" and "intelligent design"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
battleknight24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-05 02:21 AM
Original message
What is the difference between "creationism" and "intelligent design"?
... in a nutshell...


Peace,


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
haele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-05 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Creationism is one word
Intelligent Design is two.

One's been around a lot longer than the other, too.

Other than that, nothing. Apparently, that new ID "biology text book", "Of Pandas and People" was originally written before Creationism was changed to ID, and the only difference is they changed the word "Creationism" to "Intelligent Design" and "Creator" to "Designer".
There's still no indication that any "Creator" or "Designer" than the Aramaic MonoDiety commonly known as "G*d", "Yawah*" or "Alla*" could be considered.

No Mayan 3 worlds, no "Summerland", no "Mother Sky spirit dropping an egg into the oceans", no Saturn eating his kids, no Giants in Permafrost; all of which can be linked to a metaphoric version of some sort of life beginning on Earth event. Just a Creator, seven days("let there be light"), and a serpent in the Garden, all supposedly making a fool of Darwin with some "unknowable science" hidden in the gaps of experimentation, evidence, and knowledge.

Bah, Humbug. It still isn't scientific or uses scientific principles to prove the premise of the book. It's faith - another version of some sort of New Age Christian Bible - not science.
Teach it in sociology or anthropology as part of a comparative religion class, if you feel the need to expose kids to some sort of common belief system.

Haele
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mykpart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-05 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. That's so different from what I thought!
See, I went to Catholic school, and we learned about evolution, and we also studied the Bible. We were taught that the Biblical account of creation was a parable meant to illustrate the truth that God had created the world and that a day to God was not a 24 day, but could have meant an "era" or a millenium, or any span of time, since God is eternal. And all this time I have been thinking that creationism meant a literal interpretation of Genesis, and ID was like what I had been taught.

Actually, I have no problem with creationism being taught in school, provided it is taught as Christian mythology and not as science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC