Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A little LTTE help, please? I don't like the wording of this paragraph

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 06:17 PM
Original message
A little LTTE help, please? I don't like the wording of this paragraph
Edited on Wed Jul-13-05 06:18 PM by blondeatlast
(there is more to my letter, although, keeping with LTTE protocol very little more).

Any administration permits the disclosure of a CIA agent’s name to go undisciplined is an administration that does not have the safety and well-being of its citizens at heart. This disclosure sets a very dangerous precedent; how can we expect to have the most capable, intelligent, and experienced covert agents if they can believe they are mere pawns in a political game?

Mostly, I'm unhappy with my choice of "undisciplined."

Keep in mind the paper this goes to is the Arizona REDublic, which is narrowly to the left of the Washington Times.

I need suggestions as to how to get the point acrossusing a different word, but I'm stumped (very bad day at work, I'm afraid, so brain is slightly fried).

Help!

Edit: spelling. I PROMISE to proofread before sending!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gato Moteado Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. any administration THAT permits.......
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ah, thanks. Good spot. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fiona Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. how about 'unpunished"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I like unpunished too . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. That's what I'm working at, but even that has a limit.
I'm trying to be sort of uncontroversial, if that makes sense. As I say, my local paper is red, red, and then red some more; so is my metropolitan area.

Flies to honey, not vinegar, so to speak.

I will try that though.

Actually, I just tried it, and it does sound pretty good. I'll reflect a while longer, but if nothing else, that'll work nicely.

Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. unpunished?
Edited on Wed Jul-13-05 06:31 PM by rocknation
Any administration which permits the unlawful disclosure of a CIA agent to go unpunished is one which does not have the safety and well-being of its citizens at heart. Moreover, it sets a very dangerous precedent: how can America expect to retain the most capable, intelligent, and experienced covert agents if they must work in the shadow of being discarded as a political pawn at a moment's notice?

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. undisciplined or unpunished
'undisciplined' sounds like what you'd do to a child.

how about instead of undisciplined, say "go without punishment"?

Good letter, but why safety & well-being is at risk isn't really clear from your letter. Maybe does not have its best interests at heart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Going with "unpunished,' I believe. And thanks for catching the
Edited on Wed Jul-13-05 06:29 PM by blondeatlast
grammatical error, too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. Just drop the infinitive part of it
Instead of

Any administration that permits the disclosure of a CIA agent’s name to go undisciplined ...

... try ...

Any administration that permits the disclosure of a CIA agent’s name ... .

Neither "discipline" nor "punish" is necessary.

Well, not in your letter, anyway.

You could also change "permits" to "condones" for the second example.

Good luck!

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. YES--that is much better. Thanks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A HERETIC I AM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. I suggest the following;
You wrote:
Any administration permits the disclosure of a CIA agent’s name to go undisciplined is an administration that does not have the safety and well-being of its citizens at heart. This disclosure sets a very dangerous precedent; how can we expect to have the most capable, intelligent, and experienced covert agents if they can believe they are mere pawns in a political game?

I'd say it this way:

Any administration that permits disclosure of a covert operative's name is an administration that does not have the safety and well-being of its citizens at heart. This sets a very dangerous precedent; how can we expect to have the most capable, intelligent, and experienced agents if it becomes clear they could become pawns in a political game?

Hope that helps
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skygazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. Too wordy
If this is for a red paper, you have to keep it simple -

Any administration that permits the disclosure of a CIA agent’s name is one that does not have the safety and well-being of its citizens at heart. This disclosure sets a dangerous precedent; how can we expect our covert agents to perform effectively if they feel they are mere pawns in a political game?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. To skygazer and heretic--both are excellent suggestions.
I do have a tendency to be wordy when I'm serious.

Will do some revising with that in mind.

Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC