Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

First Review of Beatles' LET IT BE...NAKED

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-03 01:13 PM
Original message
First Review of Beatles' LET IT BE...NAKED
From the Observer Music Monthly suplement (The Observer is the Sunday sister to the UK Guardian). The reviewer gushes over it and says it isn't a Paul McCartney vanity project. Instead, he says, it sounds like a coherent album and that "stripping away Spector's production and ditching a couple of tracks has let the final album shine at last."

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/omm/10bestcds/story/0,12102,1062879,00.html

"The other week, I went to Abbey Road to hear what had been done to Let it Be . The idea that McCartney had neurotically piloted the new version from start to finish was rather scotched by my introduction to Allan Rouse, one of three studio employees who had been handed 32 reels of tape, told to come up with a new album and then left to get on with it. Much to their amazement, when he heard the final version, McCartney requested no changes whatsoever.

"The running order is completely different: among other changes, this album begins with the original Let it Be's closing track, 'Get Back', and ends with the title song, which used to be track six. There is none of the dialogue that peppered the original, and a version of Lennon's sexed-up Yoko tribute 'Don't Let Me Down' has been included, thus righting the wrong whereby it was relegated to the B-side of 'Get Back'. Two songs have been placed in the wastebasket: there is no 'Maggie Mae', nor Lennon's pretty rubbishy 'Dig It'. What remains is a 35-minute, 11-track album that a) sounds like a coherent work rather than a patched-up postscript, and b) stays true to McCartney's original idea of abandoning the studio alchemy that had so defined the psychedelic Beatles and re-emphasising the fact that they were a four-piece rock group (often augmented here by Billy Preston on keyboards)...

"Most striking of all is a new mix of 'Across the Universe', put to tape in early 1968 and included on Let it Be on account of a brief rendition in the accompanying film. The new treatment features only Lennon's voice and guitar, a smattering of tamboura from Harrison, and Starr gingerly keeping time on a bass drum. This minimalism suddenly places it in rarefied territory indeed; here, it sounds like a stargazing companion to 'Julia', Lennon's heart-stopping acoustic piece from The Beatles . As for the chief source of McCartney's three-decade heartache, Rouse and co. went for the hitherto unreleased version of 'The Long and Winding Road' used in the Let it Be movie. On the whole, Lennon's dreaded bass-playing is eerily on-the-money. Better still, the jettisoning of the schmaltz results in the squashing of the song's old air of piety; instead, it sounds like McCartney trying to soothe the anxiety that came from the keen sense that his group's bond was becoming irrevocably frayed."

I'm excited about this -- November 18 in the States. And remember, that's the same day as Britney Spears' new album -- let's make sure that in the Chart Battle, THIS ONE wins -- I will be absolutely ashamed if Britney beats the Beatles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
number six Donating Member (244 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-03 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. About bloody time...
Spector ruined that record
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ishoutandscream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-03 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hey, will they release the movie on DVD
That would be great!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-03 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Sometime
It was supposed to be out the same time as the movie, but for some reason, the dvd release of the movie has been delayed till sometime next yr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
absyntheNsugar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-03 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wonder how it compares to the "Get Back" Bootleg
I have this and always prefer it to "Let it Be". I assume they won't include the unfinished "Teddy Boy" that was on that boot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-03 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. It's not the same
The tracks have been mixed and remixed, unlike the original concept of no overdubs and editing. Plus there's no background dialogue. Rather, the sound of a live band is restored, and the new running order is this:

1. Get Back
2. Dig a Pony
3. For You Blue
4. The Long and Winding Road
5. Two of Us
6. I've Got a Feeling
7. One After 909
8. Don't Let Me Down
9. I Me Mine
10. Across the Universe
11. Let it Be
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-03 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Also Comes w a Bonus "fly-on-the-wall" Disc
Edited on Fri Oct-24-03 06:03 PM by emulatorloo
http://www.beatles.com

"Let It Be...Naked will be issued together with a bonus fly-on-the-wall disc that features extracts from tapes of The Beatles at the time of first making the Let It Be album and movie in the Sixties.

The 20-minute bonus disc is a unique insight into The Beatles at work in rehearsal and in the studios in January 1969."



Thanks for linking the Observer review; it was a great read. :toast:


onedit: grammar again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-03 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'll buy it because the sound quality is guaranteed to beat the bootlegs
Not to mention blow away Spector's shitty overproduction... but I'm not expecting anything I haven't heard before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC