Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jenna: Am I getting old or is she a sleaze?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 06:51 PM
Original message
Jenna: Am I getting old or is she a sleaze?
Skank is the word the boys use now.


What's up with this total trash look?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
da_chimperor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wait, which one is jenna?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
46. the one that looks like a sleaze
on the left
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
54. LOL! My question too!
And when compared to the Kerry daughters, NO COMPARISON.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Barbara is the one in red, right? Either way, it's not trash... it's
conformity. Same old style seen everywhere else by kiddies who think they're different.

Anyone who looks or acts different gets the true pariah treatment. That's why the kids all look the same... conform to their disconformity...

And yes, I just gave the correct answer... to the wrong question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Guess you've answered the part of the question about
my getting old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sigh.
Which one is Jenna again?

If it is the one on the left, well, it's certainly not THE skankiest thing I've ever seen, it's just not very cute.

The one on the right tends to dress a bit better, but she is damn pale in that picture.

Thus ends my superficial attack of the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Jenna is on the left
I like the picutre of her sticking her tounge out at the press from the back seat of a limo during the campaign better. Gives a certain window to the soul thing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
38. Did you ever see the picture of her naked
from the waist up and passed out on a picnic table?

I think I saw it here on DU but it's been a couple years ago. Wish I'd saved it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #38
53. Not really her, but looks like her:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #53
75. Close enough for me.
How do we know for sure it's not really her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #75
82. We don't.
So, using the logic of Occam's Razor we can say that it IS her.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #82
87. Well it sure looks like her
and the behavior fits too :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #87
97. No it doesn't. The girl just has the same haircut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #97
108. Oh come on
I really want it to be her.

Please, pretty please??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #108
109. ok. you win!
Everyone wants to be the like everyone else anyway, so why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
117. This one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm a hell of a lot older than you and I think she just looks like most
young folks.

That's the time to dress like that,when you're young.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. I'm not so sure there is ever a time in ones life to dress
like that outside the home, but I'm getting old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. 3/4 Scum
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. One word: Tacky
Just...TACKY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. I have nothing against her...
but she's probably trying to get attention.

I don't think either of them got much attention growing up and she probably got even less than her sister. She is not as smart or as thin as Barbara and is named after the less preferred grandmother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. you are right in those observations
a good father doesn`t drink and do coke, one only cares about the bottle and the powder...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. I hope you mean the less well known grandmother---I assume they
feel the same way about all their grandparents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. no, I meant preferred within the family
Edited on Sun Jan-16-05 07:44 PM by orangepeel68
not them specifically, but the extended family.

Based on nothing but gossip and Kitty Kelly (which is really the same thing :-) ), Mrs. GHW Bush is a matriarch who runs that family with an iron fist.

Purely on conjecture, I don't imagine that Laura's mother has much power or that anyone pays much attention to her.

on edit: Also purely on conjecture, I'd guess that Barbara Bush, Sr. probably pays more attention to the granddaughter named after her (who also happens to be the one carrying on the family tradition of going to Yale). She never made any secret of publicly preferring Jeb to George (until George got elected governor first), so I know she plays favorites.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. Dumb, drunk party bimbo's .... runs in the family
I guess.


:shrug:



:hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGirl7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. I think both are somewhat trashy...
but what would one expect with Bushes...look their cokehead/partyboy father's past, uncle Neil, and doesn't two of Jeb's kids got some problems...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. I have a friend whose cousin is a secret service person
apparently noone wants "babysitter" duty for those 2 because they are so low class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
13. The Bush twins inability to dress with any class (or fix their hair)....
never ceases to amaze me.

They seem particularly fond of bizarre combinations. Call what Jenna is
wearing "nineteenth century bordello meets Dad's old trousers".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
14. jen has really bad taste,
really bad taste. barb has always dressed better. i`m waiting for the grand unveiling of their new duds for the coronation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
103. Jenna is certainly her FATHER's daughter....
besides the poor taste and white trash mannerisms, she strikes me as someone who has little concern for anyone but herself.

Barbara seems more like her mother's daughter, not quite as pathologically self absorbed as Jenna, but far from decent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
17. Call "Dr, Rev" Fallwell and James Dobson...they
don't dress like any self respecting follower of Christ to me...what's with the uncovered ARMS? Oh my! The EXPOSED CLEVAGE! Oh JAYSUS please PRAY for these girls who obviously have not followed the lead of your brother, George W.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
19. I think they are your average looking attractive girls
Certainly not supermodel material, but I cannot say they are ugly or trashy looking either (though their politics is another matter). The thing is, here in the Austin area we are blessed with so mant very attractive women, many of whom surpass these two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
20. Sorry...
...I've got a lot bigger problems with Bush clan than the way the twins dress. I actually feel sorry for them. Hell, if we're lucky one of them might even rebel and become a liberal! I was still a conservative when I was their age...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #20
37. Visualize the outrage if Chelsea dressed like a hooker.
I'm not saying wearing underwear for a professional appearance is trashy, but there just must be a minimum standard when the kids are representing the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #37
66. Nah...
..we didn't elect them, but you're right that had Chelsea been photographed dressed like that, all hell would have broken loose and, no doubt, she would have been removed for Mommy and Daddy's care by order of a Special Prosecuter. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LDS Jock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
21. Yes to both, you're old and she's sleazy
just kidding :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rick Myers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
22. Sleaze!!!
Both of them...

When does basic training start, gurls????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Be Brave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
23. Jenna sure looks like GwB, doesn't she? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellen Forradalom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. Yes, that picture makes it very clear
You can also see the resemblance to Babs the Elder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vektor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 06:22 AM
Response to Reply #23
61. It's uncanny -
Frightening, really....Jenna is GWB in drag, but her sister really doesn't look like ANY of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
24. she looks a lot like her dad actually ......
and her sis looks like the mom.
but those are very average teenage clothes, have been for 25 years....
what is this, the fifties?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #24
48. Actually - I think the current trend is a takeoff on the 70's look
and in between the 70's and now - there were various other trends.


I agree with the notion that they are pretty much following the average teenage look. Of course - they aren't teens anymore.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
25. No, she's a skank: and a drunken one at that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. She's a drunken skank? Thank God you weren't around when I was
young.

I assume you've raised an honest,sober family and have always behaved in the same,upright way yourself.

Good Lord!




















Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Not that it's any of your damned business, but I was raised by alcoholics.
As such, I fucking hate drunks! Is that OK with you? Do I have your permission to hate drunks? Hmm???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. Call me old fashioned, but to expect the children
of the President to assume a higher standard isn't really too much, particularly since they seek the lime lite.

They chose to represent the country, they shouldn't embarrass us any further than their father.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
29. Where've you been? Jenna's been a skank for years
Did you see the photo of her going to church on Easter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madison2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
30. She works for a Washington escort service now
Everyone around her father has to be some kind of whore.

:evilgrin: :evilgrin: :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fleabert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
32. I think they look fine.
I don't like their political behavior or their families', but...I had my fair share of alchol before I was 21, I don't see what the shock is about that bit. How many movie stars do we see pictures of at clubs that are underage? Tara Reid, Lindsey Lohan (sp?), britney (before she was 21), etc... Drew Barrymore was doing coke before she was a teenager! No one goes on a tirade about them. It's not right, but it's more common than not for teenagers to drink and party.

sorry. I've been meaning to rant for awhile, and your post came along...I am not assigning my irritation to you in particular. Just the treatment they get in general, esp. here.

her outfit is well within what is considered fashionable, it's even a little conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #32
41. No sympathy.
These girls love to get drunk and fall down. Bars that don't want to adsorb the cost of their extravagance decline them now, that is a true embarrassment to all of us. This isn't exploitation, they seek it. If they conducted themselves with a minimum amount of dignity there would be no issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fleabert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:21 PM
Original message
I see your point, but I was doing the same thing when I was 15!
so I won't be hypocritical and judge them for it. I doubt the things we hear about are happening every single night, come on, we only hear the bad things cause it's fun to talk about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
55. Wouldn't' it be nice if there weren't any stories about
the children of the President of the United States getting so drunk that they can't stand in public places?

Or at very least, it stopped after the first one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fleabert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #55
62. It would be nice if the President of the United States wasn't an asshole,
Edited on Mon Jan-17-05 06:24 AM by fleabert
and I think that is a more important thing to be concerned about. I just don't know very many people who haven't done what the Bush daughters are so severely criticized for; it happens. I haven't been smashed drunk in years, but if a camera had been pointed at me from 15-17 and 19-22, there would be few I wouldn't be so proud of. I don't think I am in the mimority there.

If they (or one of them) has a true problem with alcohol, which might be more likely for them since their father had a problem, I hope they get help. I quit from 17-19, not a drop- no problem. Drank again heavily until I was 22, then figured out that if I drank less than 3 drinks I didn't make a fool out of myself! Now I stick to that rule religiously. I refuse to cast a single stone at these women for this.

I will cast many stones for their political beliefs, however.

I also think it would be nice if we didn't call women skanks, sleazy, trashy, etc..., I don't remember this kind of venom directed at any sons or brothers of Presidents. I know they have been criticized, but not like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #62
93. thank you!
I get tired of the skank, whore, sleaze thing. Doesn't seem to be applied to guys very often. Evidently the * twins were college students having fun in a variety of ways - young, foolish and inexperienced ( like most of us at one time of another) in more ways than one would expect given their status.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fleabert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 04:10 AM
Response to Reply #93
114. you're welcome! I just wish we could get off of bashing stupid stuff
and get really active bashing the insanity of the actions of this administration in a really productive manner! What does this get us? we look like gossips, not serious political critics..which I think everyone here either is, or like me, has the potential to be!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #114
120. couldn't agree more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
70. they aren't 15 anymore
they are grown up, college graduates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fleabert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #70
81. I know plenty of college grads, with advanced degrees who still
let loose every once in a while. I'm not saying it's a smart way to behave, but let's not cast the first stone here...

I just think we have much bigger things to bitch about before we attack them. I am sick of women being held to a different standard than men on stuff like this, esp. famous women. If this were two boys, most would say 'typical boys, carousing around before they settle down.' MOST, not all...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanuckAmok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
33. why can't it be both? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
34. they come off a bit skanky to me
but I always dressed pretty low-key, even as a teenager. Just don't like drawing attention to myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
36. The military could straighten them out..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. not a bad idea
<>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
39. It's not an "or" question, necessarily. :-)
But, yeah, they're kinda sleazy. It's hard to look at either of 'em without thinking of the crime family that spawned them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. The sickness that is the family oozes from them.
They are too young to know how to conceal it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. It is sad...
...that they will never get to grow up, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #42
104. That's it exactly...
as long as they live (well, Jenna anyway) they will never be able to purge that festering, rotten Bush taint from their souls. I really don't think in this case the apples have fallen too far from the tree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
44. I'm not into trashing them just because of their family
Yeah, they're immature and do very stupid things... That separates them from the rest of the teenagers in the country how exactly? The fact of the matter is that people here get outraged at their behavior for one reason and one reason only, who their daddy is.

It wasn't cool when it happened to Chelsea, but you can expect that from the ugly right-wing.

I think our side is a bit better than that. At least I want our side to be better than that.

I'm not going to respond in this thread because I've been savagely flamed in the past for not wanting to pile on the twins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #44
57. They aren't teenagers.
But the point that the time for forgiven youthful indiscretions ends in the early 40s for Republicans and in late puberty for Democrats is well taken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
45. All I can say is...
Chelsea always had to be the model of decorum. Kind of a metaphor for the Dems, isn't it? We have to be perfect, and even then, we get trashed.:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Floogeldy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
47. I'd fuck her
On principle!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. deleted
Edited on Sun Jan-16-05 10:53 PM by Bombtrack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
49. Slattern and somewhat whorish, tried for edgy but missed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagingInMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
51. I wouldn't kick either one of them out of bed
But I couldn't see myself dating either one of them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #51
122. Precisely, I hit on girls who didn't look too different when I was younger
Sorry, but I don't find them at all unattractive either in dress or physically. I have a wide range of looks that I find cute or attractive and I'm sorry but Chelsea never, ever did it for me on the physical level.

Their principles may not have much in common with mine but what the hell do we really know about where they stand on most issues anyway?

I don't expect them to rebel against their father in the public limelight and if they ever follow up with their stated career intentions (education and AIDS work) it would be interesting to see how they do in those fields.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
52. What am I not seeing? Did this turn into Amish underground
when I wasn't looking?

They look like regular dumb rich chicks. They're trashy and scandalous because their arms are showing? The top 3.5 inches of chest?

Holy shit let me jump on the act like complete liberal versions of freepers whenever any picture of a democrat chick would be posted on their site bandwagon.

My eyes, my eyes.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #52
58. It is all about parody. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #58
106. And the horrible potential nightmare that the Bush line will
continue to haunt American politics forever.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
56. you're getting old
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SarahB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
59. I disagree with her family's politics.
Period.

I don't like to join the bandwagon of disparaging those in my gender for superficial reasons. I didn't like it when the right said stuff about Chelsea Clinton's appearance and I have enough integrity as not to be a hypocrite. She's an attractive young women.

What's the point of threads like these?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liontamer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #59
72. well said nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
60. these two always look trashy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TyeDye75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
63. Its almost like
the face of junior has been transplanted straight onto Jenna and the face of Poppy has been transplanted directly onto the other one.

Are you sure this isnt poppy and junior going to a fancy dress Bush bash in drag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
64. Typical young Republican
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Fuego Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
65. Yep, total trash. The acorn doesn't fall fall from the tree...
...or the bush!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
67. This is the way a lot of girls dress in my highschool
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
68. regardless of what she is wearing, I see in Ms. Jenna's
face the fugly mug of the chimp. On that basis alone I can't stand her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
69. She looks like Chris Matthews with breasts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liontamer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
71. You're getting old
I think they both look fine. I also think that unless they're going around killing people, they're not people we should be getting worked up over.

And if they are killing people, why are we so concerned with what the two women are wearing? Is that the only thing we can do when we see women, judge them on how "sleazy" we think they are?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
73. Not mutually exclusive options
:D

But yes, she is a skank.

RL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
74. remember how we felt when Chelsea's looks were ridiculed?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
76. they are young girls....its hitting below the belt to ridicule them
cos you hate their father.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
77. Your cups runneth over
It's fine to damn George Bush from here to hell and back again, but why his daughters? Their worst sin is to be the daughters of a hated man.

They are not particularly more "trashy" or "whorish" than any young woman in their age range.

It just doesn't make any sense to hate the Bush twins. Making and occasional gag is fine, but the continual barrage of disgust is indefensible.

There's plenty to condemn in the father and his ill-intended posse.

--p!
We're all looking for a little rebirth.
Display the Eye of Horus in honor of Scott "Khephra" Lowery and affirm his vision of a renewed America.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #77
78. great post!
does no one remember our outrage when limbaugh insulted chelsea?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TXlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
79. Why all this bile directed at his children?
Edited on Mon Jan-17-05 03:12 PM by TXlib
What would you say about some RW type trashing Chelsea because she was Bill's daughter?

His daughters seem "within normal parameters" to me.

Would you post pics of your republican neighbor's daughter, and make catty remarks about her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
retread Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #79
83. Good to see I'm not the only one bothered by this crap. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleurs du Mal Donating Member (511 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
80. Look fine to me. Just "fashionable" young women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msgadget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
84. Nah,
a lot of young women dress like that and worse.

In fact, I'm wondering why all the females on the CSI shows are required to don low-cut, form fitting tops to do their lab work. Surely it must be an OSHA requirement... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
retread Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
85. I think this kind of crap is despicable ! You should be ashamed !
*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagingInMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
86. So what is your opinion on Alexandra Kerry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #86
88. I couldn't have said it better...
jeez... do we always have to resort to trashing Bush's daughters? I don't give a damn about them, but calling them trash and skanks etc. is just lame. Find out about their political perspectives and slam them for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #86
94. that she needs a slip or undergarment of some sort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #94
95. ...and if that was Jenna in that dress?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #95
100. I would say the same thing, Mis.
A lot of we females forget to check for the see-through factor. I myself don't like that much of me to be on view! Partially since I am not that young anymore...;)

However, I don't think dressing that way these days implies that anyone is "skanky" or "whorish." Those comments are pretty sexist in my view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #100
102. Good... just checkin'
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #102
105. c'mon now, I'm from the old school feminists league!
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #86
116. No way is that pic real. They sell fake pics of celebs like that on ePay.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #86
118. She wore the dress to an awards show--in FRANCE!
No doubt the transparency factor was less evident in the dressing room than it was under photo lights. Oops.

Let's see how well the Bush twins turn themselves out at the Inaugural & Post-Inaugural celebrations. (& the Pre-Inaugural bashes that have already begun.) They'll be representing the country. I'll bet Alexandra would have worn something glamorous but suitable to HER father's festivities.

The fashions shown at the top of this thread reflect what's "in" for casual wear--I've seen the stuff on the way to the old-fartess department. These looks can be hard to wear. What seems witty & cute on a skinny model girl can look trashy on someone who hasn't lost her baby fat.

Fashion & appearance are lightweight topics. But it's evident that the First Family lack the ability to look critically at themselves in a 3-way mirror & their handlers never tell them that they look anything other than "fabulous".



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackie97 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
89. Women should dress as they desire to.
Edited on Mon Jan-17-05 06:05 PM by Jackie97
That includes the daughter of the abstinence only president. I'm not into calling women sleazes for dressing in a way others don't like.

My only problem with Jenna is that she helped her daddy win the election despite having political opinions so different from his. However, I couldn't expect anything else from the Bush twins but loyalty. Where was Ron Reagan while Reagan was running? He sure wasn't helping the Democratic party probably.

She does seem to have GWB's facial figures though. Yuk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagingInMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #89
92. When did she express political views different from her dad's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackie97 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #92
101. It's a known fact.
The twins are for gay marriage and they're pro-choice.

I can't remember if they actually went, but they were scheduled to attend a gay wedding this past September 11th.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagingInMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #101
107. Well good for them.
I just gained a little more respect for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feathered Fish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #101
119. They're pro-choice?
Where did ya hear that? If so that's great. I knew about the Gay marrige thing, which I thought was alright. I'm not really into bashing the twins either, they didn't lie to engage in war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #89
96. I must confess...
...that "abstinence only president" or not, I suspect the only chaste member of the immediate family is Laura. It's just a hunch...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sequoia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
90. Must be the Texas idea of fashion.
Or, maybe it's her outfit for her night shift at Billy Bob's Dancing Girls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
91. You're getting old.
I think she looks good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dees Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
98. You couple her style of dress with
her antics and you come up with with a person who is not a poster child for "faith and family values". I really don't give a flying flip what she wears. It's all about Repuke hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminflorida Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
99. This is awfull....really why do we have to resort to trashing two
kids....

For God's sakes...please show some class.

Anybody ever trashes one of my daughters, prepare to have your fuc*%$g nose smashed in by this retired sailor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freebird12004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
110. see ~ just like everyone else
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ekhunter Donating Member (118 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
111. I saw the thread and thought this would be about Jena Jamison.
wow was i wrong and disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
112. and in the 1970s
Edited on Tue Jan-18-05 01:08 PM by WoodrowFan
we dressed so nicely :p







teasing, I think they look ok.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rene moon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
113. I think she looks fine
I like the outfit, even though I would never wear it myself.

What's with all the twins bashing? Leave them alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
115. She's the one on the left. I always had them mixed up, as well.
The other one is the "smart" one, but neither one of them has done much to prove themselves worthy of respect or affection. I guess that the old axiom is true, that "the apple never falls far from the tree." :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
121. Nothing I don't see at some DC gallery and museum functions
The Bush girls aren't that different behaviorally from a lot of girls I hung out with growing up at home or in college.

Any fair comparison would require that you compare them against the behavior of kids from other political families. Against that standard I imagine they don't rank all that differently regardless of whether the parentage is Republican and Democratic.

Gore's son has had his run-ins with the law ( more severe than the girl's underage drinking) and I don't see anyone really condemning him all that harshly.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC