Blue-Jay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-25-04 04:52 PM
Original message |
| Funny thing about Rage Against The Machine... |
|
Their music actually calms me down when I'm angry. Angry music. Pissed off music. Damn, it puts me in a good mood. Rock the motherfucker, RATM!
So called facts are fraud They want us to allege and pledge And bow down to their God Lost the culture, the culture lost Spun our minds and through time Ignorance has taken over Yo, we gotta take the power back! Bam! Here's the plan Motherfuck Uncle Sam Step back, I know who I am Raise up your ear, I'll drop the style and clear It's the beats and the lyrics they fear The rage is relentless We need a movement with a quickness You are the witness of change And to counteract We gotta take the power back
Fuckin' right.
|
stinkeefresh
(563 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-25-04 04:56 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. they are still on a major label, right? |
|
how can they be called Rage AGAINST the Machine when they generate profits FOR the machine?
I mean, I like their lyrics and all, but they are somewhat oddly named.
|
Blue-Jay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-25-04 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Being popular enough to get a contract with a major company doesn't negate their music.
The Berlin Philharmonic has a contract with Deutch Grammophone, but they still deliver the goods.
|
stinkeefresh
(563 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-25-04 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 7. I don't mean bag on them- they fight the good fight |
|
Edited on Tue May-25-04 05:04 PM by stinkeefresh
I just think the name has some unintended irony.
|
bedtimeforbonzo
(344 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-25-04 04:56 PM
Response to Original message |
|
them being communists signed to Sony. I guess some machines are more equal than others.
|
HornBuckler
(978 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-25-04 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. Well Dylan Is On Columbia |
|
It's A Neccessary Evil Unfortunately... If You Want To Make A Living -
Some Bands Have Made It On Indie Labels However - That Luxury Wasn't Really Afforded To The Old Schoolers...
Fugazi Comes To Mind
|
stinkeefresh
(563 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-25-04 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 5. hey, I don't hold anything against a band on a major- |
|
I just think they should have a different name.
|
Blue-Jay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-25-04 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
I propose they rename themselves Menudo.
Better?
|
stinkeefresh
(563 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-25-04 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
vi5
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-25-04 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 9. The thing is they never TRIED an indie label.... |
|
I mean their debut came out on a major. Even though Zach had some indie roots with his first band Inside Out, they never even attempted to go the indie route. By the point where they were starting out the indie scene was thriving as a result of the post-Nirvana spillover.
I don't begrudge them their success since any band that gets that popular singing about what they did deserves many propers. But there's no doubt that there is a case to be made for them being hypocrites as well.
Even they weren't so vehement in their anti-capitalism, or even just more subtle (you mentioned Fugazi), it wouldn't come across as being so bad being on a major. But they were so far to the extreme of the spectrum that to be that firmly entrenched in "the machine" is dubious.
Again, they have my utmost respect but I don't even bother to argue with my more dogmatic aquaintances about it because in many respects they are 100% correct.
|
HornBuckler
(978 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-25-04 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
I Don't Give A Rat's Ass What Label They Are On If They Rock - The More Distribution The Better
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Jun 18th 2013, 01:01 AM
Response to Original message |