Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Connecticut's Republican Governor Under Fire

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
JailBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 03:56 AM
Original message
Connecticut's Republican Governor Under Fire
Hey, isn't Connecticut George W. Bush's home state? And don't this Governor's crimes seem trivial compared to Bush's?

I'm not saying they ARE trivial; on the contrary, America is in dire need of ACCOUNTABILITY. But after reading about George Bush's crimes all day long, just about anything short of mass murder fails to impress me.

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/13/nyregion/13ANAL.html?ex=1071982800&en=2a7193eae03357cf&ei=5062&partner=GOOGLE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Throckmorton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Connecticut Repuke Leadership is major screwed up
Lets see, Governor two times ethics violator, former mayor of largest city in jail for corruption, former mayor of 4th largest city, and former repuke challenger for Joe Leibermans senate seat in jail for child molestation and corruption. The GOP in Connecticut is a perfect example of what is in store for the national party in a few years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The Dems are screwed up, too
Nobody really challenged Rowland on his ethical violations or the impending budget crisis in his last election. The Dems were pretty meek in challenging them and kind of left Dem gubanatorial nominee Bill Curry hung out to dry.

Rowland has had violation after violation for years now and the Dems have basically rolled over for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Is this coming from the WH? That is what we heard for 8 years.
We were going bad in our morals because of the morals in the WH. Must be the same now. Comes from the top. Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cappadonna Donating Member (303 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Absolutely, Rowland is the GW of Connecticut, he's only in power because..
Edited on Sat Dec-13-03 09:19 AM by Cappadonna
......"the loyal opposition" are in such disarray that they couldn't amount a counterattack with two nukes and a fleet of Sherman Tanks. Rowland is a lame duck waiting to be roasted with an orange-honey glaze.


So, we have our own personal Bunnypants in the Constitution State, a corrupt Repuke prick waiting for someone, anyone, to kick his ass back to Waterbury (Where last Republican mayor joined the ranks of Catholic Priests, R Kelly and Micheal Jackson in famous child molestors hall of shame).

To all of the CT Dems (I won't even mention the Greens because God forbid WE actually monkey around and some no-name loser and let Rowland sit in power for another 4 years) who looks like the top dog out of the Democratic heap right now? Dick Blumenthal could easily take the nomination, the only people who are actually pissed with the guy right now are indian casino tribes.

There's also the reigning mayor of the Elm City, the 6 time champ, Mayor John Destefano. Yeah, big city mayors rarely rise to the occassion to be governor in Connecticut, but John Destafano has some pull now thanks to his League of Cities Presidency (and the fact that he's the ONLY big city mayor in Connecticut without mutliple warrants or ethics violations).

As a life long New Havener (and Yale Grad) I personally think JohnD bends over backwards for Old Blue too often, and is a loudmouth punk more concerned with lining his buddies pockets than making New Haven better. But, New Haven is on a major upswing compared to other Connecticut cities. so I guess he has a shot. Also, Sec. of State Sue Bysiewicz might run, although you REALLY have to know state politics to know who the hell she is.

Up for grabs kids, who takes home th big prize. Respond or flame away.

- Cappa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. A few Dems that could win
I'm pretty sure Rowland won't run next time... will it be Jody Rell to follow him for the bad guys?

Maloney might be able to run if he stays in the public eye after his loss to Johnson. John Larson is fairly popular. DiStefano is a possibility.

Obviously, Blumenthal could easily take it - but, then he could have beaten (or challenged) Rowland last time around if he had intra-party support.

My question is - Lieberman and Dodd are both getting on in years... any young state reps that look promising to replace them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cappadonna Donating Member (303 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Hmm.....haven't thought about that....
Personally, if Holy Joe gets his ass handed to him (again) he'll probably run for governor and knock everyone out the box (Shudder). As for replacements, there none that come to mind. As any CT lifer knows, the state reps and state senators aren't known to do more than be a bunch of weaked-kneed party hacks who are virtually invisible to the average voter. First of all, like their DC counterparts, they cave at any sign of a real fight. Even one their most "progressive" leaders, Bill Dyson, voted for that crap ass budget Roland spewed out that protects his rich buddies while throwing the poor out in the street.

Also, state reps tend to be the most invisible of politicians. They're so above everyday local concerns that you probably don't know them (unlike, say, a city councilman or the mayor) and aren't big dog enough to warrant any real attention (like Smirk or Governor Smack-My-wife Rowland).

Any thoughts?

- Cappa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Lieberman
I think he's a bit too old to run for governor... he'll be what? mid 60s in 2006?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cappadonna Donating Member (303 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-03 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Maybe, but thats the problem in politics, its dominated by old white guys:
Yeah, Lieberman will be eligable for social security in 2006, and really should step aside and let someone with newer and fresher ideas step up to the plate. But, CT residents are more likely to vote for the trusted "Grampie Joe" then look for new leadership. Come on, up until recently, most of our Presidents were in their mid fifties. And lets not forget Red Ink was around since God was a teenager, and we elected him!!

The problem is that there are too many long in the tooth baby boomers and WWII generation pols who are almost always clinging to power with their fingernails, keeping newcomers out of the process. Not to say that we do "logan's run" style house cleaning in Congress, that would just be plain stupid-- as most Gen-Xers are even more apathetic and clueless than their parents. But you have to admit, people are more likely to vote for someone who is older and more establish than some young buck. Look at how the media almost ignores John Edwards, he's smart and built his life fighting for the little guy (Ralph Nader with an actual life and personality) but because he's younger than most of his opponents' underwear (He's only 42, Sharpton is 44) he's virtually ignore as the smart young Ken Doll.

Its a shame, really, as we need new blood in Connecticut politics.

- Cappa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuttle Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Actually, "former mayor of largest city"...
Joe Ganim, was a Democrat -- as most news accounts were quick to point out.

It seems that if the media DOESN'T mention any politcal affiliation, then they're repukes.

Tut-tut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC