Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will Dean's employment at Planned Parenthood cause problems?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
reknewcomer Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 11:21 PM
Original message
Will Dean's employment at Planned Parenthood cause problems?
How many middle road voters will take pause with this information? I did not even know he worked there until tonight's report on VPR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. It seems like the freepers are going to exploit it
no doubt about it. Even though he actually did not do abortions, he did support Planned Parenthood. I don't know how it will play out though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Let them use it...
because it's the freepers who are keeping the clinics operating. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Will work well with my pals
and actually family planning crosses partisan lines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. stupid RW talking point that will backfire
Dean never performed abortions when he was on Planned Parenthood board......that's just a dumb RW talking point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. He was onthe board -- an unpaid position
If someone has credible other info, opls. post it.

And I don't care who "exploits" it. For those for whom that's a problem, they wouldn't be voting for us anyway. AND we have NO BUSINESS apologizing for it. And Dean won't, which is just one reason I support him.

Why are you pandering to the right with such shit question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mattforclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I don't think the OP
is 'pandering to the right.' Know thy enemy. Be prepared for thy enemy. Defeat thy enemy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reknewcomer Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
18. pandering to the right with such shit question?
Are you in denial that Dean worked for Planned Parenthood or just scolding me for asking for input about that fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mattforclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. Oh dear
That is bad. I didn't know he worked there. Do you have a link, maybe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevolutionStartsNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Oh please, how is it "bad"?
It's not something Dean has ever hidden, and it's not "bad."

Yes Bush/Rove will try to say he was an "abortion doctor" or some such, but Dean has confirmed that he never performed abortions. It's a non-starter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mattforclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Well
it is bad precisely because Rove will call him an abortion doctor. He might not do so directly, of course, but all he has to do is say 'planned parenthood' and people will make a connection.

Sadly, Politics is not about truth, it is about perception. That is why I am concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #8
32. EVEN IF HE DID, IT'S LEGAL
Jesus, people, look at yourselves. You've allowed the right to frame the debate on this issue. AS IF THERE WOULD BE ANYTHING IMMORAL OR WRONG OR SCANDALOUS IF HE HAD PERFORMED ABORTIONS.

UNBELIEVABLE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajabr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Why is it bad? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. it's bad because some nut case could take a shot at him
these fundie american taliban types are psycho enough that he could be in danger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Why is it 'bad'? And why are we discussing RWing talking points...
...like they actually mean something?

- I'm not suggesting this ISN'T a sincere question...but why would any Democrat have a problem with someone working for planned parenthood?

- We shouldn't allow the Right to frame the debate like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mattforclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. It is not 'bad'
I personally don't have any problem with it.

It is how it will be used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mattforclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. sorry for any misperceptions n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #13
34. Matt, here's a clue for you
If they don't Have something on our candidate, they will freakin' make stff up. Relax. The only way to deal with it is to face it down. So worrying about the abortionist "perception" only helps them (as opposed to YOUR candidate, for example).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
17. Clark wants abortions to be allowed on military bases
that's just as bad for the Repub fodder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mattforclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. While that can be used against him,
that is a policy question. Unfortunately, people see supporting a policy and implementing it differently. If Rove portrays Dean as an 'abortion doctor' that has a larger impact than supporting choice on military bases or any other circumstance. 'Abortion doctor' and Dean will be associated, and many people will get the misperception that Dean performed abortions, whether or not it is true.

It is a sad fact of politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Corgigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. They were when I served
as a woman in the military. Damn they would fly a woman out for the D/C performed at Wright Patterson in Ohio. However I served under Ronnie Reagan the Republican Saint of the religious right.

Please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #17
27. The RW is out in full force from tonight onward, Slink.
Watch carefully.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #27
35. I am.....those low count posters are very suspicious.
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reknewcomer Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
19. See the VRP archives for the 7:00 PM show about Dean
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mattforclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
22. It is this kind of thing that I am afraid of
http://www.mattmargolis.com/blog/index.php?p=178

"Former Vermont Governor, and Democratic candidate for President, Howard Dean has said he would veto any parental notification law as President.

Howard Dean, once involved with Planned Parenthood, would rather lead this country down a path where little girls can get abortions – a serious procedure no matter how you feel about the issue – and leave their parents, the people legally and morally responsible for their child, in the dark."

That gives the impression that Dean performed abortions. It is not true, but it creates that impression anyway. That kind of evil trick will be exploited.

Know thy enemy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoNotRefill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
11. Nope...most pro-lifers....
would never vote for a Democrat under any circumstances...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. I agree
Not shocking news that a Dem is pro-choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dobak Donating Member (808 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #11
23. we're not talking pro-lifers
many moderates would be unhappy if they thought that Dean performed abortions

Dean didn't, but I bet $$$ that Rove can make people think he did
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mattforclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Yes
repost:

This is the kind of thing that alienates the moderates, who are neither pro-choice nor pro-life absolutists:

http://www.mattmargolis.com/blog/index.php?p=178

"Former Vermont Governor, and Democratic candidate for President, Howard Dean has said he would veto any parental notification law as President.

Howard Dean, once involved with Planned Parenthood, would rather lead this country down a path where little girls can get abortions – a serious procedure no matter how you feel about the issue – and leave their parents, the people legally and morally responsible for their child, in the dark."

That gives the impression that Dean performed abortions. It is not true, but it creates that impression anyway. That kind of evil trick will be exploited.

Know thy enemy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
25. That's why it's such a non-issue
when are we going to learn to STOP PANDERING to the far right and stop giving a shit about offending their extremist beliefs? If there's one thing that the Dean campaign has demonstrated over the past year it's an impressive ability to counterpunch- quickly, before false accusations get cemented into reasonable people's minds (certain partisan DU'rs notwithstanding).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mattforclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. No false accusations in my mind
I am concerned entirely about the possible political effects, I am well aware that it isn't true.

I will of course support Dean if he wins the nomination. If he does, I sincerely hope that he is every bit as capable of counterpunching as you say, because he will need to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mattforclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. btw, most people are not reasonable
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. I think most people are reasonable, we just get a bad sample
Edited on Wed Dec-10-03 01:10 AM by depakote_kid
mainly because it's the unreasonable and the outrageous that get highlighted by the mass media. The problem is more that most people are woefully uninformed or worse- misinformed. Countering that misinformation is critical, which is where the internet plays a vital role. It used to be that campaigns could circulate deceptions and equivocations and they would fester for a while, giving more people a chance to internalize them. Now, with so many people connected, rumors and innuendo get picked up quickly- and it's much easier to formulate and disseminate an official response.

If Dean does win the nomination (which, despite all the hoopla here at DU and among the puditocracy, is still very much an open question) the campaign will need to be more innovative and wiley than ever to counter Rove- that's for certain. It's unknown territory, this dynamic... this movement. In the event it happens, hopefully we'll have Clark supporters along with us to cover our backs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
30. Most centrists are not pro-life, as far as I can tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. Or should I have said they're not "anti-abortion"?
It's getting confusing to know the correct terms to use!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 03:05 AM
Response to Reply #30
37. Most centrists are centrist
there are many people (like me) who are pro-choice, but are in favor of reasonable restrictions on abortion.

Parental notification seems a no-brainer to me. Of course you notify the parent before doing any medical procedure on a minor. I can'r even understand who would be against that? It seems sompletely obvious.

For the abuse fears, there's alays some kind of bypass to a judge if there's a fear that a girl would be abused if she tells her parents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaraokeKarlton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
33. It was part of his medical training
Don't all doctors have to do a basic reproductive health rotation? This is a non issue. I'm sure Frist had to do this as well. This really is a very silly thing to be talking about when there are so many important and more pressing issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opstachuck Donating Member (184 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
36. only if he keeps showing everyone his bloody hanger n/t
Edited on Wed Dec-10-03 02:13 AM by opstachuck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC