Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stu Rothenburg reenforces Clarks general election advantage

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 04:41 PM
Original message
Stu Rothenburg reenforces Clarks general election advantage
he said on inside politics that the 2 southern states other than Florida that democrats most have a chance at are Arkansas and Louisiana. Of course the "liberal" political staff at CNN(Woodruff, Crowely, Shneider) didn't bother to mention that Clark might have a better advantage than any other candidate in these states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AmericanDem Donating Member (521 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. of course not
If they were to say anything positive about Clark, their reputation would ruined. I think Crowley should share some of that Twinky diet she is on with Woodruff.:hurts:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I was watching one day when she gave a big Freaudian(SP?) slip
they were discussing polls and Woodruff asked her something or other about whether Dean's numbers were down. She said "No, that's the good news!..er.. the good news for the Dean campaign" it was another demonstration of the permanant glee that Dean and his campaign have been giving the right for the past months
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Rothenberg
is correct. And I kept waiting for the other boot to drop...Clark's. Judy managed day 9 of not saying Clark's name.

I should qualify my count. I only count the days I watch, and I only count from when I took on this personal task. So far the count is at 9....that means 9 days of no Clark vs 0 times Woodruff has mentioned Clark. Is she an awesome 'ho or what?

I work with a woman from Arkansas who comes from a family with 8 kids. Her husband's family has 5 kids. Every single one of them and their spouses, including the hardcore fundies, is voting Clark. Three will vote Dem if it is not Clark on the ballot. Sorry, if their voting patterns make no sense, but they will do what they will do.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC