Clark's true colors - an apology
re:
http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20031215&c=1&s=tai... A short while ago, I sent you a scathing critique on Matt Taibbi's piece on Wesley Clark, excoriating him as a clueless sophomoric Kuchinich supporter.
I was wrong. I am sorry.
Supporting Kuchinich is actually Taibbi's most redeeming feature.
What he failed to disclose in his "undercover" hit piece is his real agenda: it's not Kuchinich that justified the venom in that piece,but his true love: Slobodan Milosevic. It seems Taibbi feels that the entire world -Wesley Clark, his followers, NATO the international community, the judges and witnesses at Hague are guilty of conspiring against Taibbi's one and true love: pure as driven snow Milosevic.
Here's one Taibbi piece to deminstrating this:
http://www.agitprop.org.au/stopnato/19990509exilewalker... Yes, Matt Taibi - the world is wrong. You and Slobodan are right. But if you believe that to be true, why not disclose your reasons in your article?
Why hate Clark for eating napoleons when you can tell the world that stopping genocide is a bad thing? Come on, Taibbi, make my day: defend genocide!