Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DNC Debate on MSNBC -- 4pm et -- thread #4

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:29 PM
Original message
DNC Debate on MSNBC -- 4pm et -- thread #4
Continue here!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Clark continues to amaze. He OWNS this debate.
Ladies and gentlemen - this is our guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. By what measure.
Sharpton sounds like he owns this debate, and owns Tom Brokaw.

Clark is doing fine. But the whole tone of this debate is that MSNBC is trying to keep a lid on things.

The questions are really weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Dean sounded like Dore Gold
He toed the Likud line on Saudi Arabia completely. I agree with him on SA, but his close ties with AIPAC are worrisome. Can he be objective in the Middle East or will he reward AIPAC's aid and toe the Israeli line?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. do you remember the flack Dean got for saying we should be even-handed
concerning the I/P issue? Dean was trying to impartial and the other Dems attacked him. To me, that reveals if he gets elected, he'll be objective in the Middle East.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
37. He is very close to AIPAC
How can he be objective when he is in the pocket of a lobby that supports anything a foreign nation does?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
40. He later backed off and said he made a mistake for saying "evenhanded"
That's some set of principles he has there.

Howard "Gary, what do I do?" Dean
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDittie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. This has been one of the better debates
becuase it's been two hours and because it hasn't been constantly interrupted by cheering.

Dean, Kerry, Gephardt have all been testy (I guess because it's in Iowa and they're all close), but Clark has just eclipsed everyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. this is the first of the debates I've actually seen....
I'm impressed, especially with Dean, Kucinich, Mosely-Braun, Sharpton, and to a slightly lesser extent, Clark. I'm very happy to see the heat they're pouring onto Bush*. Even Kerry, Edwards, and Gephardt seem to have realized that their best strategy for ducking out from under their IWR votes is to focus on the fact that Bush LIED. It's refreshing to see the gloves coming off when the candidates focus their anger on Bush!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berner59 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. hands down...CLARK!!!!
He's hit his stride for sure!! I think he hit it right when he said that this isn't about who voted for what...he's silenced Dean on that issue which he's frankly beaten to death...

Kerry is still trying too hard...he just doesn't have to, he's got got great ideas and experience...

Edwards is still so smooth and comfortable...boy a Clark/Edwards is mighty appealing...

Gephardt is holding his own...still a tad too angry at times...

Clark has the right balance of angry intellect going...he is VERY impressive today!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. Think about Chimpy and Clark in a debate!
Wouldn't that put a smile on your face!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Langis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. yes it would
I can't wait!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indigo32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. Just want to thank everybody
keeping us cube dwellers up to date.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. Kerry has been pompous and lousy in this debate.
How many times has he gone after Dean? Some one should keep count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. Go AL
keeps sticking it to Bush*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robsul82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
13. Is Edwards still awake?
Tom hasn't asked him anything for a while now.

Later.

RJS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dawgman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
14. Sharpton Rules!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
15. Threads 1 2 and 3 here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
16. Flag issue!
Let's see what Clark says! Clark said..."He would support an ammendement IF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SUPPORTED IT." I hope he speaks to it!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
17. Notice they always bring up
clark's support for the flag amendment....

never Dean's, Kucinich and Gephardt stance...which is essentially the same.

that's what media whores do the best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #17
49. Yup, the media working for the WH.
I like Dean, BUT he REALLY needs to get a NEW 2 minute speech. I think I've heard the same one about 100 times. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
93. Dean doesn't support changing the U.S. Constitution for the flag
Edited on Mon Nov-24-03 06:18 PM by w4rma
He only supports a regular bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robsul82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
18. Whoa...Edwards just said Gore liked the Patriot Act?
"WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA?"

Later.

RJS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. Gore liked parts of it,
but thought that as a whole it was so dangerous that it should be repealed, and the good parts brought back as separate legislation. So, a little Yes, but mostly No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
20. Kerry on Biden/Lugar Oct. 9th 2002
I would have preferred that the President agree to the approach drafted by Senators Biden and Lugar, because that resolution would authorize the use of force for the explicit purpose of disarming Iraq and countering the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs and delivery vehicles. The Biden-Lugar resolution also acknowledges the importance of the President's efforts at the United Nations. It would require the President, before exercising the authority granted by the resolution, to send a determination to the Congress that the United States has tried to seek a new Security Council resolution or that the threat posed by Iraq's WMD is so great that he must act absent a new U.N. resolution. I believe that this approach would have provided greater clarity to the American people about the reason for going to war and the specific grant of authority that Congress was giving the President. The Administration, unwisely in my view, rejected the Biden-Lugar approach. However, perhaps as a nod to the sponsors, it did agree to a determination requirement on the status of its efforts at the United Nations, which is now embodied in the revised White House text.


http://www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/speeches/spc_2002_1009.html

Is that the same as the final IWR?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. NO!
Good find.

Bush couldn't agree to that because "the explicit purpose of disarming Iraq" was never his motive. Not agreeing to that should have been a CLUE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #28
74. Yep.
Bush saying "Fuck Saddam we're taking him out" should have been another.

Or saying we're going in with or without the UN.

Or piling up our forces even while inspections were ongoing.

Or saying Saddam was in breach of the final resolution because we didn't find anything after only a month of inspections.

Well.. hell.. There were red flags all over the place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. Noone said it was the exact same, but we still would have been in Iraq.
Both Gephardt and Kerry said it was similar. Dean has gotten pretty much a free ride on this issue while accusing the others of giving Bush a "blank check" which doesn't acknowledge ANY concessions that they fought for and won.

Kerry wasn't prowar and Dean wasn't antiwar. They were closer than most people realize thanks to the piss-poor press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #29
44. When is someone going to read this statement and ask
Howard Dean to explain:

He (Dean) gets a deluge of phone calls from reporters asking him to clarify his position. Which is -- "as I've said about eight times today," he says, annoyed -- that Saddam must be disarmed, but with a multilateral force under the auspices of the United Nations. If the U.N. in the end chooses not to enforce its own resolutions, then the U.S. should give Saddam 30 to 60 days to disarm, and if he doesn't, unilateral action is a regrettable, but unavoidable, choice.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #44
55. The UN was disarming Saddam
There was no need for unilateral action, Dean didn't think the UN would allow Saddam to have WMD, and so Dean was against unilateral invasion.

What's hard to understand about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #29
66. Gephardt fought for concessions?
I remember you blaming him for undercutting Kerry's efforts to put some restraints on the IWR.

???

And when it all comes down to it, Kerry supported the war, IWR or no.

Dean didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #66
79. Yes he did undercut the others, but concessions were still made
and to say otherwise is just untrue.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #79
84. What concession?
Did he get bush to promise to try really really hard to get the UN on board before invading?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
21. Edward: Did Clinton make mistakes in war v terror? NO.
"I met with Sandy Berger at end of Clinton administration...they said that terror was most important issue...Bush failed, not Clinton, by not taking Berger's warnings seriously."

Now on to the patriot act.

Brokaw takes MTP line of quesioning -- why did you vote for it? Edwards repeats MTP argument -- there were good parts in it, but it's the execution at the hands of this administration, and now we know its too much for Ashcroft to handle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
22. Will this debate be aired again late tonight?
I missed it and would like to see it, but I won't be able to watch until later tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #22
45. replay at 9 p.m. est.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #22
46. Possibly on C-SPAN this weekend as well
Edited on Mon Nov-24-03 05:53 PM by oasis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #22
57. Yes. I see its on CNBC later tonite (in California anyway)
I'm gonna tivo it then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theoceansnerves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #57
85. what time
do you know what time it will air on cnbc? i can't find it on their schedule. i don't get msnbc, but i do get cnbc...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phirili Donating Member (451 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
23. Tom Brokaw doing a great job. I like the single moderator format
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. Brokaw is a self-centered prick, and has been since I knew him in Tulsa
45 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theoceansnerves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
24. not to interrupt
but does anyone know if this will be archived online for viewing later? or rebroadcast on c-span? i don't get msnbc but i would really like to see this..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mindfulNJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. it re-airs at 9pm
on MSNBC. I must say...I am firmly in Clark's camp now. Let the fun begin:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poskonig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
25. Clark really has his shit together.
Three consecutive solid answers. I'm very impressed today!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moz4prez Donating Member (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. did Gephardt just call Bush half nuts?
or was he hinting at it by attacking Kim Jong Il? it's great to see the candidates have stopped slapping each other in the small of the back
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. i think he was refering to the NKorea pres n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moz4prez Donating Member (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #32
43. yeah i know
still, it's a nice thought
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robsul82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. No.
He called Kim Jong Il half nuts.

Later.

RJS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. LOL! I kinda wondered who "this guy is half nuts" was he referring to!
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #30
38. talking about Kim Jong II
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
33. Kerry said he would undo
only one of Bush's environmental fiascos???? he should have said, all of them.

Ask Kerry.....he wrote the book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
36. Kerry....
the ever politicking politician as his closing statement.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. He had a bad debate this time.
I want to see some of the Kerry people say otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #39
51. I said on an earlier thread that he's talking like his monitor is bad.
After attending over a thousand soundchecks, I can recognize when someone's monitor feed is bad. His sound and Edwards' are totally different. That throws you off because you aren't hearing yourself accurately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #39
52. I think he's an honorable guy but there's just something I can't identify
that kinda gives me a little creep. Maybe it's that he comes across to me as a little bit too stentorian. I dunno, I just have a little feeling of discomfort when I watch and hear him.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #36
59. Clark's closing speech
"I am the only one on this stage that can go toe to toe with *. I am the only one who has negotiated a peace agreement." He can beat * in a landslide IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
41. Dean....
YOU HAVE THE POWER!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
42. He's pandering with the whole MLK thing. I don't like it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poskonig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #42
50. In fairness, Geppy invoked MLK too.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
47. CMB
beautiful sing song voice......her normal stump speech.....but good

Gephardt....MLK just like Dean.....These white men love to evoke MLK...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDittie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
48. Here are my immediate observations:
Clark separated from the field with some of his answers.

Kerry didn't look good at all. "The French are the French"?

Dean looked occasionally flustered and angry by lashing back at Gephardt and Kerry. (I DO like his "YOU have the power" stump.)

Gephardt did nothing to distinguish himself; Edwards remains stuck in the mud and all the rest are just window dressing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poskonig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #48
53. Good, concise summary.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #48
75. I'd agree with that
.

As a Dean supporter, I'll have to say that it was an ok debate for him. He gets points for being ready for them to attack him in mass this time, but he never really took it to the people like he's done before.

Kerry is the big loser, whether or not it's a technical fault or not.

Gephardt and Edwards? Were they even there at all? My memory of them being there is already starting to fade.

Clark was the big winner. But one debate win doesn't make a campaign win either. If he can keep this up it will end up being Clark vs Dean instead of the expected Kerry vs. Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
54. Wes....
said it best!

He is the only one.....AMEN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moz4prez Donating Member (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
56. Clark's really asserting himself and his big fat imposing resumé this time
around
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #56
64. I've been waiting for that....
drop the humbleness ......

he needs to tell them what he's got to offer....and that is

HE CAN BEAT GEORGE BUSH!

NUFF SAID!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
58. Clark
Edited on Mon Nov-24-03 05:56 PM by in_cog_ni_to
speaking on Bush's ads on PATRIOTISM! Who can stand toe to toe with Bush on foreign policy? I am the candidate who can stand with GWB. YOU BETTCHA! Go Clark!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phirili Donating Member (451 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
60.  Dean U have the Power to say somethingelse. Other than communist mantra
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #60
65. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #60
76. The people are stupid. Only the elite shall rule!
Kerry 2004!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
61. WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!!
WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!!
WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!!
WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!!
WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!!
WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
62. WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!!
WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!!
WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!!
WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!!
WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!!
WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!! WES CAN WIN!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
63. OMG John Edwards - fabulous as always. Clark/Edwards.
Holy moly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #63
72. I agree
with that combo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #63
82. Clark and Edwards did well tonight.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #82
96. I think Edwards and Kerry always do well. Just goes..
to show these debates mean nada. In my opinion, Kerry and Edwards always win but they're not doing the best in the polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
67. Did Edwards recall todays debacle in the Senate at
all? Our party gave it away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
68. Tom, you aren't running
Why do you get a closing comment???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moz4prez Donating Member (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #68
81. retirement.
he won't be moderating any more debates
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemCam Donating Member (911 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
69. tom gave a fine closing remarks..
didn't know he was running...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
70. Brokaw: the corn is as high was an elephant's eye.
Wow, he's really turned into quite the egotist. It's all about - HIM!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #70
94. lol
sounded like he had a comedy writer come up with that closing speech.

Yes, Tom, thank you for putting the important Tawana Brawley question out there. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
71. I think Brokaw did a good job
He was even handed and while he didn't shy from the hot spots, he didn't throw any gasoline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
73. I cannot wait to hear the chimpster debate ANY ONE...
...of the Democratic candidates for president. He's toast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
77. I don't know if I can
stick around for the aftermath....where a win turns into a lose!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
78. Funny, I was at work and I forgot all about the debate....
:)

I am glad Clark did well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
80. Lieberman....
back to cry......watch him dog out Clark!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErasureAcer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
83. Clark will lose
Clark has NO domestic agenda.

People want healthcare, education and equal rights!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #83
86. Clark has a fine domestic agenda...
and it's easy to find it out. Try www.clark04.com


People also want security, peace and competence. Clark offers all those.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #86
87. Howard Fineman thinks Clark came out on top
Just says he thought Clark "won" the debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #87
88. It would be hard to disagree with that assessment...
Clark CLEARLY showed he has the guts and inclination to take on Bush directly. He's not gonna be afraid to fight, and he's always fought to win.

Combine that with his very liberal politics, and he'll be a powerful force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #87
91. Fineman is a whore of the nth degree.
Edited on Mon Nov-24-03 06:15 PM by Melinda
Right behind Peggy Noonan and Tweety, and most progressive/liberals I know take anything any of them say with a HUGE grain of salt.

That said however, Clark WAS impressive - he did a great job taking on Bush* and his Iraqmire. Good job Wes. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #91
98. Howard seems to genuinely like Clark. The rest of the..
whore media hates Clark but Bush's lapdog Fineman likes him. Go figure. I'm totally confused. :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #98
100. Don't be confused.
Edited on Mon Nov-24-03 06:39 PM by Melinda
It's bring down Dean day. Those so called 4th estators will roast Clark soon enough - and you can take that to the bank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #100
105. Oh please. Reread my post. I already said that the..
rest of the media hate Clark. So stop trying to act like you informed me about something I already know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #86
92. Security?
Edited on Mon Nov-24-03 06:17 PM by redqueen
We could have prevented 9/11.

Too bad the MIC's propoganda works so well. :(

on edit: not criticizing Clark's policies at all... just saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #83
90. Your post is so crazy and outta line....here, read:
http://clark04.com/issues/

Mis-representing the truth doesn't help Kucinich. He is
a fine man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #83
95. Can I have some of what you're smokin? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robsul82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
89. Debate called for Clark...
...on Hardball, Fineman said so and there was no disagreeing, so I've gotta believe that's the call.

They made basically two points - 1) Clark won and 2) the attack on Dean was obviously coordinated.

Later.

RJS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
97. The Debate after the Debate...Clark did well! Wouldn't let
Chris railroad him.

GENERAL SMACKDOWN! has officially arrived.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
99. From just reading the thread I surmise one of two things:
Either Dean did not get much chance to talk, or he did not do well. I rather doubt he did so poorly he is not mentioned, so did he get a chance to talk?

Did Hardball interview him or just Clark?

I have just not watched the TV at all this afternoon, so I have going just by this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #99
101. You know that I'm biased but
I thought Dean did great. He had to fend off the tag teamers of Kerry-Gep most of the debate and I think it probably cost him a few additional questions from Brokaw. Dean was much better in this debate than any of the others. Kerry was a BIG loser in my opinion. Clark did extremely well, and probably "won" the debate when he got real fired up during the IW questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #99
103. Well I AM biased
and I will try to give you my unbiased opinion. Dean did fine. Some of the questions were awkward and since he had to do rebuttals it was hard for him to get on a roll. Dean just wasn't as "sparked" as we've seen him.

Clark did really well, but that doesn't mean Dean did a bad job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
102. If debate's gonna be on CSPAN please let us know...
I looked at CSPAN's schedule and don't see it so far.
And my cable doesn't get MSNBC; and I do get CNBC
but they're not reruning it in Seattle.
Whatta bummer.

MSNBC's boasting about their "exclusive" debate.
Yeah it's exclusive. Doesn't seem like debates should be though.
Seems like they should be broadcase so people with/without/
with different cable can all see them.

Whatta country...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bertrand Donating Member (764 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
104. Two Things
Edited on Mon Nov-24-03 06:41 PM by Bertrand
1. Dean should never use the term "pooh-pooh" again if he is trying to run a populist campaign.

2. Clark should stop leading his replys to questions with "let me tell you ..." and "im glad you asked that" because he comes across as disingenuous.

Edit: forgot to add "im glad you asked that"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC