Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pentagon PSYOPS worked in CNN newsroom!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
9215 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 10:29 PM
Original message
Pentagon PSYOPS worked in CNN newsroom!
This is Operation Mockingbird on steroids!

Check the inbedded link for more info.

http://www.fair.org/activism/osi-propaganda.html

Pentagon Propaganda Plan Is Undemocratic, Possibly Illegal
February 19, 2002


The New York Times reported today that the Pentagons Office of Strategic Influence is developing plans to provide news items, possibly even false ones, to foreign media organizations in an effort to influence public sentiment and policy makers in both friendly and unfriendly countries.
The OSI was created shortly after September 11 to publicize the U.S. governments perspective in Islamic countries and to generate support for the U.S.s war on terror. This latest announcement raises grave concerns that far from being an honest effort to explain U.S. policy, the OSI may be a profoundly undemocratic program devoted to spreading disinformation and misleading the public, both at home and abroad. At the same time, involving reporters in Pentagon disinformation puts the lives of working journalists at risk. .......

snip
According to the New York Times, one of the military units assigned to carry out the policies of the Office of Strategic Influence is the U.S. Armys Psychological Operations Command (PSYOPS). The Times doesnt mention, however, that PSYOPS has been accused of operating domestically as recently as the Kosovo war.

In February 2000, reports in Dutch and French newspapers revealed that several officers from the 4th PSYOPS Group had worked in the news division at CNN's Atlanta headquarters as part of an internship program starting in the final days of the Kosovo War. Coverage of this disturbing story was scarce (see FAIRs Why Were Government Propaganda Experts Working on News at CNN? <http://www.fair.org/activism/cnn-psyops.html > 3/27/00), but after FAIR issued an Action Alert on the story, CNN stated that it had already terminated the program and acknowledged that it was inappropriate.

Even if the PSYOPS officers working in the newsroom did not directly influence news reporting, the question remains of whether CNN may have allowed the military to conduct an intelligence-gathering mission against the network itself. The idea isnt far-fetched-- according to Intelligence Newsletter (2/17/00), a rear admiral from the Special Operations Command told a PSYOPS conference that the military needed to find ways to "gain control" over commercial news satellites to help bring down an "informational cone of silence" over regions where special operations were taking place. One of CNNs PSYOPS interns worked in the networks satellite division. (During the Afghanistan war the Pentagon found a very direct way to gain control-- it simply bought up all commercial satellite images of Afghanistan, in order to prevent media from accessing them.)
Its worth noting that the 4th PSYOPS group is the same group that staffed the National Security Council's now notorious Office of Public Diplomacy (OPD), which planted stories in the U.S. media supporting the Reagan Administration's Central America policies during the 1980s. Described by a senior U.S. official as a "vast psychological warfare operation of the kind the military conducts to influence a population in enemy territory" (Miami Herald, 7/19/87), the OPD was shut down after the Iran-Contra investigations, but not before influencing coverage in major outlets including the Wall Street Journal, New York Times and Washington Post (Extra!, 9-10/01).
The OPD may be gone, but the Bush administrations recent recess appointment of former OPD head Otto Reich as assistant secretary of state for Western Hemisphere affairs is not reassuring. It suggests, at best, a troubling indifference to Reichs role in orchestrating the OPDs deception of the American people.

Indeed, as the Federation of American Scientists points out, the Bush Administrations insistent efforts to expand the scope of official secrecy have now been widely noted as a defining characteristic of the Bush presidency (Secrecy News, 2/18/02). The administrations refusal to disclose Enron-related information to the General Accounting Office is perhaps the most publicized of these efforts; another is Attorney General John Ashcrofts October 12 memo urging federal agencies to resist Freedom Of Information Act requests. ......



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
althecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well that's true... but then CIA psyops work in every newsroom....
Edited on Tue Nov-11-03 10:50 PM by althecat
(on edit) ACTUALLY... you can all just ignore all of this.... it is really just a bit of comment on Mockingbird. Somthing that has always fascinated me.

The OSI was wound up after it was exposed in the NYT... it then became the OSP Office Of Strategic Plans... which seems to have done the same thing. This is PNACer Douglas Feith's baby, which fit like the OSI snugly under Rummy's wing.

So yes Mockingbird on steriods.. But as I point out below there is no reason to beleive Mockingbird was ever shut down.

***********

Original post follows...

After Watergate a whole bunch of papers were released about

Operation Paperclip or Operation Butterfly (On edit you had it in your intro Mockingbird!!!! Duh!!!) but basically it was an operation - long running - that had placed operatives in practically every important newsroom in the country. Many in senior positions.

The papers were damning because the had information on how much it cost to retain a NYT reporter and had comments about how having a reporter on the payroll was cheaper than having a hooker.

Of course the revelations didn't get a lot of airplay for obvious reasons - and there is no reason to think the operation was ever wound up.

How else do you explain Judith Miller.

Just another fine day in a country they call America I guess :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. chill baby
he means, I think, "you can ignore what I'm about to write, but I'd like to say it..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. No doubt about it. Some of us have been saying so for years.
The BFEE was involved in the coverage of Clinton and election 2000, the propagandizing of 9-11 and Iraq, and they're involved in our Democratic primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Braden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. 4th Psyop Group also worked at
NPR.

read newspaper articles and look at how carefully cultivated the key words are.

CIA Distorting reality worldwide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep 16th 2014, 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC