Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

if bush loses

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Stupdworld Donating Member (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 10:00 AM
Original message
if bush loses
does that mean the pnac/nwo/bbv/trilateral commission/illuminati conspiracy never existed? or did it mean they have too many catberts running their organizational structure? I mean how can a global multinational corporation inspired network with aims for global power possibly lose an election in which they rigged everything?

i mean, its like bush has to win in order for all this inconceivable, epic, zerg-like evil to be validated!


in other words, if bush loses, they just dont make super villains like they used to.

i miss lex luthor.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. If we nominate Dean he won't
I am afraid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. But if we do...
You will vote for him....right?

I'd hate to think that any Dem or progressive would make an indirect vote for Bush by not voting for the eventual nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Are you a good representative of Dean supporters?
or a parody of one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe it means that their cover is blown and they need
a new face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mistress Quickly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
4. ok, put on your tinfoil...
If Bush loses, maybe whoever wins is part of PNAC!
Maybe its all part of the plan.

:tinfoilhat: :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. No conspiracy is 100% foolproof. Otherwise we wouldn't be here, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. There is Always an Elite and a Tacit Coalition of Interests
just like racial attitudes used to be in the South uner segregation. It does not center on one person and it is not all-powerful. If it were the world would not have been the strides it has towards inclusiveness, suffrage, and fairness.

Just like during civil rights days, it takes an active, aware, and passionate populace to drive the agenda. It can work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
7. I will be celebrating for weeks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
8. Absence of evidence
is not evidence of absence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
9. More sneering insults from stupdworld
You know, I imagine you in 1933 Germany, "But how could the Fuhrer have set the Reichstag Fire himself?"

How about in 1973, "It is quite patently absurd to believe that a President of the United Sattes would abuse his office in such a way. Do you really think there is a group of CIA rogue agents going around spying on Democrats and perpetrating dirty tricks?"

I could go on and with items which, once investigated and sanitized, become "safe" for someone like you to discuss and believe in. Of course, these things (and many others like them) all strated out as wacky "conspiracy theories" that people like you sneered at arrogantly.

Yet where would we be if people didn't have the courage to investigate these "wacky conspiracy theories"?

What is quite tiresome is your sneering marginalizations, designed to remove any legitimate questioning on the topics of Cosnpriacy to Commit Fraud (and perhaps worse).

PNAC is certainly real, and it's goals are spelled out as clearly as those in Mein Kampf.

Have you actually READ PNAC's manifesto? Perhaps you should prior to sneering, although I realize that isn't quite as much fun.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stupdworld Donating Member (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. 100%
you're right. making fun of stuff is fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. But foolish in time of distress...
You still haven't answered my questions, not that I'd expect that.

Did you dismiss Watergate as a wacky conspiracy theory in '72?

Or were you too young or not yet born? (gosh, what a surprise THAT would be!)

Mightn't you be happier on a video game discussion site? There's lots of dumb stuff to make fun of there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
12. You see, the problem is that the Bush administration is incompetent
They aren't merely imperialists. They are incompetent imperialists.

That should be clear by now. Watch anything but Faux News lately, and you'd see that.

Speaking of Lex Luthor, where's Osama bin Laden? Where's Saddam?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Osama who? And Saddam is "gone" like the Taliban...Shrub said so....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Sep 19th 2014, 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC