Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Articles of Impeachment.. A First Draft..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 05:12 PM
Original message
Articles of Impeachment.. A First Draft..
Edited on Tue Dec-20-05 05:23 PM by ddeclue
Everyone:

Please send the below to your Congressmen and Senators (and newspapers) and ask them if they could please take the time to fill in the blanks.

Write your Congressman here:
http://www.house.gov/writerep /

Look up and write your Senators here:
http://www.senate.gov /

It is surprising how little editing was required to go from the original Richard Nixon Articles of Impeachment to the below. It only took about 10 minutes.

http://watergate.info/impeachment/impeachment-articles ....

Doug De Clue
Orlando, FL

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Articles of Impeachment Adopted by the Committee on the Judiciary

Date:______________

Article 1
Article 2
Article 3

RESOLVED, That George W. Bush, President of the United States, is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanours, and that the following articles of impeachment to be exhibited to the Senate:

ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT EXHIBITED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN THE NAME OF ITSELF AND OF ALL OF THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AGAINST GEORGE W. BUSH, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, IN MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT OF ITS IMPEACHMENT AGAINST HIM FOR HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANOURS.

Article 1

In his conduct of the office of President of the United States, George W. Bush, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his consitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has prevented, obstructed, and impeded the administration of justice, in that:

On or about December 17, 2005, and prior thereto, agents of the National Security Agency on orders of George W. Bush committed unlawful warrantless wiretaps against thousands of American citizens inside the United States in violation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (USC TITLE 50 CHAPTER 36 SUBCHAPTER 1), and in engaged in a conspiracy with him to commit an offense against the United States in violation of USC TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 19 § 371. Prior thereto, George W. Bush, using the powers of his high office, engaged personally and through his close subordinates and agents, in a course of conduct or plan designed to delay, impede, and obstruct the investigation of such illegal activities; to cover up, conceal and protect those responsible; and to conceal the existence and scope of other unlawful covert activities in violation of USC TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 73 § 1512 paragraph (b).

The means used to implement this course of conduct or plan included one or more of the following: issuing Executive Orders contrary to United States Code, making false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States; withholding relevant and material evidence or information from lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States; approving, condoning, acquiescing in, and counselling witnesses with respect to the giving of false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States and false or misleading testimony in duly instituted judicial and congressional proceedings; interfering or endeavouring to interfere with the conduct of investigations by the Department of Justice of the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and Congressional Committees; endeavouring to misuse the National Security Agency, an agency of the United States; and making or causing to be made false or misleading public statements.

In all of this, George W. Bush has acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President and subversive of constitutional government, to the great prejudice of the cause of law and justice and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.

Wherefore George W. Bush, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office.

Adopted ____ to ____ by the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives, at __________________________________, in Room ______ of the _____________ Office Building, Washington D.C.

Article 2

Using the powers of the office of President of the United States, George W. Bush, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in disregard of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has repeatedly engaged in conduct violating the constitutional rights of citizens, impairing the due and proper administration of justice and the conduct of lawful inquiries, or contravening the laws governing agencies of the executive branch and the purposed of these agencies.

This conduct has included one or more of the following:

He has, acting personally and through his subordinates and agents, endeavoured to obtain from the National Security Agency, in violation of the constitutional rights of citizens, the contents of private phone calls for purposes not authorized by law, and to cause, in violation of the constitutional rights of citizens, criminal investigations to be intitiated or conducted in a discriminatory manner.

He misused the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the National Security Agency and other executive personnel, in violation or disregard of the constitutional rights of citizens, by directing or authorizing such agencies or personnel to conduct or continue electronic surveillance or other investigations for purposes not authorized by law, or any lawful function of his office; he did direct, authorize, or permit the use of information obtained thereby; and he did direct the concealment of certain records made by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency of electronic surveillance.

He has, acting personally and through his subordinates and agents, in violation or disregard of the constitutional rights of citizens, authorized and permitted to be maintained a secret investigative unit within the offices of the Department of Defense, which unlawfully utilized the resources of the government, and engaged in covert and unlawful activities to unlawfully gather intelligence in violation of domestic prohibitions.

He has failed to take care that the laws were faithfully executed by failing to act when he knew or had reason to know that his close subordinates endeavoured to impede and frustrate lawful inquiries by duly constituted executive, judicial and legislative entities concerning the unlawful naming of a covert operative of the Central Intelligence Agency, and the cover-up thereof.

In disregard of the rule of law, he knowingly misused the executive power by interfering with agencies of the executive branch, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Department of Justice, the National Security Agency and the Central Intelligence Agency, in violation of his duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed.

In all of this, George W. Bush has acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President and subversive of constitutional government, to the great prejudice of the cause of law and justice and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.

Wherefore George W. Bush, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office.


Adopted ____ to ____ by the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives.


Article 3

In his conduct of the office of President of the United States, George W. Bush, contrary to his oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has through the use of often-secret Justice Department findings, substituted his own judgment for that of the courts assuming to himself functions and judgments necessary to the proper exercise of the judicial power vested by the Article III of the Constitution in the Supreme Court and the lower Courts established by Congress.

In all of this, George W. Bush has acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President and subversive of constitutional government, to the great prejudice of the cause of law and justice, and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.

Wherefore, George W. Bush, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office.

Adopted ____ to ____ by the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well done!
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Go check out my posts at www.brainshrub.com
Texastoast:

I've just started writing over there as a regular and have several posts I'm proud of.

The latest is about the wiretaps (another will out on Friday) and it can be found at:

www.brainshrub.com/president-wiretap

"Listening in without a warrant isn't just impolite, it's a felony"

Doug De Clue
Orlando, FL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. You mean (oh please)
I can actually present facts to pukians and not get kicked off the site? Novel! Thanks for the link!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. No no no...not a pukian site... read the banner!
It's a liberal / progressive site run by progressives!

Please be nice to the people over there (well we do get the occasional wingnut like PatriotHeart but that's the exception not the rule.)

Doug D.
Orlando, FL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Doh
Shoot. I would someday like to be able to post and discuss the issues in a mannerly way on an inclusive site, but it is difficult in today's climate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Well that's the fault of the wing nuts...
They don't respect us and don't believe in scholarly debate and from my experience they aren't very good at scholarly debate anyways.

The closest thing we have at brainshrub is PATRIOTHEART.. the star spangled elephant who is just way out of his league trying to post comments over there.

I used to use about.com's liberal and conservative boards but got tired of the nutjobs there.

I also belong to several yahoogroups but they are mostly liberal with a few wingnut trolls who aren't really interested in debate but rather just posting propaganda in hit and run fashion.

I like Brainshrub because unlike the about or yahoogroups situation, blogs are posted by invitation of the owner only (although comments are open to all).

It gives me an opportunity to write something serious and polish it up and put in the display case for others to read. People get a chance to then pass the ideas on to others they know.


Doug D.
Orlando, FL

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. K & R! IMPEACH NOW!!!
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. I assume it's bad form to "kick" your own posts...
Doug D.
Orlando, FL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. I don't think there's a kick police on DU n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. He must be impeached or removed from office.
Edited on Tue Dec-20-05 06:04 PM by screembloodymurder
We can not let this go unchallenged. I would support removal by any legal means possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
10. Ramsey Clark has already written articles of impeachment
They might be a little outdated though. They are at:

http://www.impeachbush.org/site/PageServer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yeah but I'm focusing 95% on the wiretaps.
It's a lot harder to prove all the other weasely stuff (and there's been a lot) thatBush has done but this time he's confessed on television in front of everybody so - game over.

In this case, less is more - let's not get all spread all over the map over stuff we can't prove because the Repugnicans will use that as a way to diffuse the momentum and turn it into another "he said she said" shouting match where the public will lose interest and it all blows over.

So - let's stick to nailing his ass on the wiretaps. It's so black and white and unspinnable it's ridiculous.

(Read my post at brainshrub.com/president-wiretap, "Listening in without a warrant isn't just impolite, it's a felony")

Doug De Clue
Orlando, FL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. ----------
:bounce: :bounce: :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
14. ----------------------
:bounce::bounce::bounce::bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
15. ----------------
Bump
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
17. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
18. We need one for Cheney, too!
They need to go at the same time. Otherwise, DarthVader may have to fill in for a time. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC