Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"War on Christmas" turns at least 15

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 11:58 PM
Original message
"War on Christmas" turns at least 15
The "war on Christmas" is hardly a new meme, although it did take a break.

I did a little looking. :evilgrin:

We know it was revived in earnest last year; but there was a long, long gap between 1990 and 2004 when Christmas apparently wasn't threatened.

I couldn't find the phrase "war on Christmas" anywhere in U.S. newspapers in that time. Interestingly, as near as I can tell, the Washington Times was the first to trot it out in 2004.

Many can access 2004 news; here's something from 1990 as grist for the mill.

Letter to the Editor, the Capital Times of Madison, WI, December 20, 1990:
Dear Editor:

How sad that your Dec. 6 editorial should support the Madison schools' war on Christmas.

Thanks to the district's anti-Christmas policy, school secretaries are afraid to keep a poinsettia on their desks. Parents are supposed to be able to walk out of a Christmas concert not thinking that they've just been to a Christmas concert. How Kafka-esque!

(snip)

What kind of Orwellian doublespeak is a policy that disapproves of Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer because he pulls Santa's sleigh and because Santa Claus, as we know, is a contraction of St. Nicholas?

(snip)

The Capital Times introduces a red herring into the issue by suggesting that those who disapprove of Dr. Travis' policy are right-wing Christian fundamentalists "trying to see how much Christmas they can sneak into the schools.''

Peg Miller, Madison


---

Peg Miller was not simply a parent, incidentally, although she garnered 443 signatures in an attempt to force the school to do a little Jesus, Mary, and Joseph. Miller is currently Director of Religion Education at St. Peters Catholic Church.

At the time, she was a representative of Concerned Women for America, who are busily blowing the warning horn for attacks on Christmas these days. They first appeared on the national stage in 1981, where the Boston Globe reported in February of that year reported the CWFA had joined a list of supposedly 200 conservative groups who were going to start watching TV for vulgarity and organizing boycotts:

"THEY'LL BE WATCHING", Boston Globe February 3, 1981

A new coalition of predominantly conservative organizations said yesterday it will launch a monitoring and advertising boycott campaign to reduce "violence, vulgarity, sex and profanity" on television.

"We do not all share the same political orientation or religious convictions," said Donald E. Wildmon, chairman of the new Coalition for Better Television who also is head of the National Federation for Decency. "We do, however, share a mutual concern about television.
He said, "Concern about this issue is so strong that the coalition already represents the largest number of national and regional groups ever to join together in such a venture."

Wildmon declined to release a list of the approximately 200 groups he said had already joined the coalition. But present at his news conference were several people identified as members of the coalition's Board of Directors, including Ronald Godwin of the Moral Majority; Equal Rights Amendment opponent Phyllis Schlafly; Judie Brown, president of the American Life Lobby; and Beverly Lahaye of the Concerned Women for America.


---

They didn't pick up Christmas for nearly a decade, but you can recognize the patterns. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. So I guess they didn't care before
It's so annoying how they're trying to ruin this time of the year with their selfishness. *sigh* :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shenmue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. I remember those lame-ass bumperstickers...
"Keep Christ in Christmas," on the back of cars in the church yard when I was in grade school. At the time I thought it was 'cute.'Only later on did I start to realize what they were talking about, a Knights of Columbus thing to ram their views down everybody's throat. Yeah, they're oppressed. :eyes: A relic of 1950s McCarthy paranoia. The non-strictly religious are out to turn your children into perverts who sacrifice goats to the moon. Or something.

They did far more to drive me away from them than the people they were afraid of ever could.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinbgoode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. My, my...and Don Wildmon's name appears again.
That man sure has managed to carve out a nice living doing basically nothing of value to society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. kick for morning folks
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spundit Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I don't care
what anyone else wants to do with Christmas. Secular, strictly religious, whatever. As long as I can have a huge tree, good food and get drunk by midday on the 25th, that's all I need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC