|
Edited on Thu Dec-08-05 08:02 PM by drooly11
I haven't seen today's installment. But i was actually glad i watched. Hate or love stern (i love), one has to respect his savvy, and his feelings about the first amendment. Free speech protection means speech you find deplorable is also protected. Don't like it? Then you don't like America. And that's that. One of the few things i'm black and white on.
i could go on and on. Here in salt lake, they have "free speech zones" for protestors. Last time i read the constitution, it had free speech zones. Clearly marked on the map. Look at a map. Specifically the part labeled "USA". There's your free speech zone buddy.
Caveat: I don't hate Bill Reilly. I think there's a place for him. Watch the movie The Last Supper starring Cameron Diaz and see where i'm coming from (ron perlman plays the rush-type character, it was made in 95). Long and short: he's an entertainer first. Having entertainers be extremely one-sided attracts viewers. Those that love and hate him in near-equal proportions(i'm guessing a lot of you watch him too, only screaming and throwing things at the tubes). It's stupid to not think his handlers don't plan on vilification from a faction. Again, it's entertainment, and that means drama. I don't know how close Reilly the character is to Reilly the person, but one shouldn't get them confused. What you watch is a carefully crafted and tested character.
I digress. I watch the techniques he employs. It's funny to watch him pick apart someone who wasn't in a position of power, or has an expectation of civility. I believe some readers actually do have to spend time on the pseudo-news/talk show circuit. I've noticed a few posters who mention having to be on Matthews and so forth. Don't know the validity, but i'll take people at their words. So maybe this may seem interesting.
After watching him with stern, i realized Bill as the interviewer has a few predictable traits. Here are the things he respects: - Angry rebuttal... Actually i should say a lack of intimidation. That doesn't mean silence or shocked "How could you be so F'n dumb?" looks, i mean going on the offensive - quick, terse rebuttals. - Power. If you have money and a lot of power, you'll watch him test the waters but quickly back off. I saw this as well with his interview on Bill Maher's show. He will quickly become friendly and almost obsequious. -Stature. Seriously. If you're lucky enough to be taller than him, it's an obvious discomfort.
I haven't seen today's installment. But i noticed how he was trying to pigeonhole stern. Stern went on the verbal offensive, but did a few things that disarmed Reilly. - he had quick and concise rebuttals. - He would NOT allow to be cut off, and he did suave-ly. - He thinly, but playfully threatened Reilly. - He included Reilly as a nice gesture in his rant about creative freedom on networks "look, broadcast was so scared of the fcc and complaints, you really couldn't do anything. Nobody on broadcast had their own opinions, there could NOT have been an o'reilly before a stern" And bill had to eat it.
Anyhow, if one wants to spar with him, or has to, they would serve themselves well to watch the video. How many times did o'reilly try to get a lock down on "so there'll be more four letter words on satellite?" "no, there'll be more humor and freedom to do what the comedy bit calls for". It was good goldang fun.
My .02.
Thanks for reading my babble.
-d
|