Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bushists allow jihadists to define the terms of "victory" in Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 12:39 PM
Original message
Bushists allow jihadists to define the terms of "victory" in Iraq
Edited on Wed Nov-30-05 12:40 PM by BurtWorm
Stephen Elliot, at HuffingtonPost.com, points out that the National Strategy plan Bush laid out today continues the brazen Bushist tradition of misleadingly tying Iraq and al Qaeda:




http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stephen-elliott/national-...


On page four of the paper, we get the subheading Prevailing in Iraq will help us win the war on terror. Following that are three bullet points:

- Osama Bin Laden has declared that the third world waris raging in Iraq, and it will end there, in either victory and glory, or misery and humiliation.

- Bin Ladens deputy Ayman al-Zawahiri has declared Iraq to be the place for the greatest battle, where he hopes to expel the Americans and then spread the jihad wave to the
secular countries neighboring Iraq.

- Al Qaida in Iraq, led by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, has openly declared that we fight today in Iraq, and tomorrow in the Land of the Two Holy Places, and after there the west.

It's not that the bullets aren't true, but the intent is clearly to link the war in Iraq with bin-Laden. The presumption being that Iraq has always been about fighting terrorists when what has actually happened is we have created a breeding ground for terrorists.





Elliot makes an excellent point, but what really strikes me is that juxtaposition of the notion of "prevailing in Iraq" with the three references to Qaeda goals in Iraq. Are the Bushists really trying to tell us that the battle won't be won until the jihadists are wiped out? Do they think Americans will throw their support to a war only if they believe the result is that Qaeda will be made miserable and humiliated? Do they think, in other words, that Americans want a holy war?

There are a whole slew of problems with this tack. Number 1, they did not sell the war to Congress or the world as jihad. They sold it as a war against WMD and Saddam's imminently lethal dictatorship (both of which reasons proved to be based on delusion or deception).

It's true that the Bushists worked very hard to sell that idea to the American people, who were happy to buy it when they didn't know how costly a jihad was. Considering that the cost only keeps rising, how likely is it that Americans will buy it again? Anything is possible with Americans, I suppose. But the Bushists have left themselves open to more challenges about how long the jihad will last, whether it will spread to other countries, and how much all of this is going to cost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bush has taken far too long
why aren't people asking what the hell were you doing invading Iraq in the first place and why the hell are you taking so long to sort it out. People should be using the words lier and incompetent.

Besides he put the jihadists there.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Jul 23rd 2014, 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC