Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Catholics Are Divided Over New Directive on Gays

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Thom Little Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 05:03 PM
Original message
U.S. Catholics Are Divided Over New Directive on Gays
By Neela Banerjee and Katie Zezima
New York Times
Monday, Nov. 28, 2005


Grappling with the implications of a Vatican directive issued last week that would bar most gay men from seminaries, Roman Catholics at several parishes around the country yesterday offered sharply contrasting interpretations of its impact on the priesthood, on the potential for sex abuse by clergy members and on the church itself.

More than three dozen interviews at churches in Los Angeles and around Boston, Washington and Austin, Tex., underscored that Catholics were as divided as the rest of the country in their attitudes about gay men and lesbians. Roughly half the Catholics interviewed praised the Vatican document as upholding church teachings, which consider homosexuality "objectively disordered." But just as many parishioners criticized it as unfair to gay men, saying that a priest's commitment to celibacy should be the issue, not his sexual orientation.

Similarly, some Catholics said that because the majority of victims in the scandals involving sexually abusive priests were boys, barring gay men from the priesthood would reduce the likelihood of such abuse in the future. But others said there was no link between homosexuality and pedophilia, especially many parishioners in Boston, an archdiocese profoundly affected by the sexual abuse scandal.

Both sides largely predicted that if the directive, or instruction, was vigorously enforced, it would reduce the number of priests ordained in the Catholic church at a time when it is grappling with an acute shortage of clergy members. Yet supporters of the Vatican's stance said that such a step was necessary to root out priests whom they considered dangerous.




http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/28/national/28catholic.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Benny Hill, or some other comedian, did a sight gag about some monks
back in the old days misspelling CELEBRATE as CELIBATE.

Seriously, why do they CARE what consenting adults do with their own fiddly bits? It really is a curious obsession on their part.

So long as they aren't out in the street frightening the horses, it should be no one's worry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. what about all the raging heterosexuals?
Seems to me a vow of celibacy is just that, no matter what your sexual orientation.

Pedophilia and homosexuality have nothing to do with each other.

How many Catholics saw this one coming when Ratz became the Pope? Wonder what his next act of 'cleansing' will be?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberaler Donating Member (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Another example of how dangerous
religion is and what a threat it is to this world. Disgusting catholics!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC