Wednesday's Boondocks about finding a man for Condi Rice

[IndianaGreen]

For those that missed the previous panel, which was posted in DU yesterday, here is the first for Tuesday:

http://www.ucomics.com/boondocks/2003/10/14/

And here is the one for today:

http://www.ucomics.com/boondocks/2003/10/15/

[JHB]

1. Bwahahaha!

Yesterday's:


and today's:


Now do Mallard Fillmore and other "conservative comics" ever poke fun at their own skewed logic like this? Hell no!

[IndianaGreen]

2. "it isn't the least bit sexist or chauvinistic"

What I really like about this idea is that it isn't the least bit sexist or chauvinistic

That's precious! And the more reason why the decision by the Washington Post to not carry Boondocks this week was a purely political decision, and not motivated about any concerns on their part about it being "the least bit sexist or chauvinistic."

The media is still protecting Bush and the idiots around him.

[realFedUp]

3. Is Aaron going to out her in a national comic strip?

I don't know that she's a lesbian and don't care
but some in here have posted that.

[Capn Sunshine]

5. Isn't every intelligent politically powerful woman

automatically a lesbian

[OneBlueSky]

4. now let me get this straight . . .

we're invading countries because Condi's horny? . . . hell, maybe just a nice little sex toy in her Christmas stocking will do the trick . . . take up a collection, anyone? . ..

[neebob]

6. Sorry, but this bothers me

Like there's not plenty of fodder for ridiculing Condi that doesn't have to do with her gender or sexual orientation. I don't care who the target is or whether the other side would do the same thing. I don't even care if it's supposed to be some kind of ironic statment. It's demeaning, and not just to women.