Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYers: Yes Or No On Prop. 1?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 11:25 PM
Original message
NYers: Yes Or No On Prop. 1?
What do you think? Common Cause and Women's League of Voters say vote yes. Got a call from Spitzer that said vote no. Opinions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. he's going to be on the colbert report any minute now...
i bet spitzer will mention it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Liz Krueger, who is my state senator...
and a reformer says NO. If she and Spitzer agree on this, I'll go along with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Did She Say Why?
The ads for yes say it is to balance the budget for the first time in many years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. The argument against it is that it can actually make the budget problem
worse, because if the deadline is passed, the legislature will have the authority to spend money without the governor's signature. It doesn't solve the problem it pretends to address and only makes it worse.

So I hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYFlip Donating Member (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. I asked this on another thread
The poster said her union said vote yes but she's voting no because it would involve giving more power to the repugs in office and it might be different if Spitzer was in office. Bottom line I'm not sure either. Would like more opinions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. Conservatives , Republicans, Libertarians against it.
Edited on Mon Nov-07-05 11:44 PM by baldguy
"The Powers That Be" are against it. Pataki is against it.

Good enough for me. I'm voting "Yes".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Good Point
Also the one about unions saying vote yes. The only thing that bothers me is why Spitzer would urge no. I hope he isn't going to turn out to be someone other than who I think he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Prop One takes the budget away from the Governor
Spitzer wants to be the Governor. 'nuf said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. What's the language on it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. This Is It
"I. Amendment to Articles IV and VII of the Constitution, in relation to the submission of the budget to the Legislature by the Governor

The proposed amendment to Articles IV and VII of the Constitution would change the process for enactment of the state budget by (a) providing for a contingency budget if the Legislature does not act on the Governor’s appropriation bills before the start of the fiscal year; (b) placing limits on the amount of spending during such contingency period; (c) once such contingency period begins, eliminating the requirement that the Legislature act on the Governor’s proposed appropriation bills, and instead authorizing the Legislature to end the contingency period by adopting a multiple appropriation bill making changes to the contingency budget, subject to line item veto by the Governor; and (d) authorizing the Legislature, subject to veto by the Governor, to modify the spending limits for future contingency budgets, except that such changes cannot take effect until three years after enactment. The proposed amendment also sets forth certain requirements for the operation of a fiscal stabilization reserve fund, from which money could be disbursed in a subsequent year. It would require estimates and information provided by state departments to the Governor for use in preparing the budget to be available to the public. It would provide a date certain by which the Governor must submit a budget and appropriation bills to the Legislature. It would reduce the time the Governor has to make changes to the budget and appropriation bills submitted to the Legislature without the Legislature’s consent from thirty days to twenty-one days. Shall the proposed amendment be approved?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm voting no,no,no
NYS Senator Bruno(R)cooked this up. It would take budget power away from the Governor, just as we are about to get a Dem in office. :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYFlip Donating Member (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Thanks
That's the best explanation I've heard so far. I too will vote no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. So It Would Be Controlled By Silver & Bruno? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Not exactly, here is a link that might help you decide
http://www.gothamgazette.com/article/fea/20051031/202/1639#3

NY has budget problems but I just don't think this is the way to fix them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Very Interesting
Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
egadsbrain Donating Member (407 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Good link! Gotham Gazette...
is where I go when I need help figuring out these proposals. I decided to vote no. Spitzers opinion probably "tipped" my vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 04:09 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Got it. Vote no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
18. Well, We'll Know In A Few Hours
How this all shakes out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC