Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ohio was recounted last year, right??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NoBushSpokenHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-05 11:34 PM
Original message
Poll question: Ohio was recounted last year, right??
Please vote first then scroll down to see why I ask this question.

Ohio had a recount in December of 2004. Were the results conclusive?

Sorry, polls are turned off at Level 3.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NoBushSpokenHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-05 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. The reason for the poll:
I just realized that many Democrats were so upset by what happened Nov 2nd, 2004, they left the forums, turned off the news and tuned out the world for a while. By the time they have returned, the recount was over. Many may not realize the recount was not ever completed. Oh, it started alright, but was shut down with the results certified prior to the observers review of the ballots. There were many irregularities found throughout the state in the recount (that wasn't).

The correct answer is: It was not complete.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shenmue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-05 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks
That's what I thought too.

Criminal Repugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-05 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Betchur ever lovin' a it wasn't. And Blackwell WILL
be held to account for violating Ohio state law.

We NEED TO TAKE BACK OHIO. Not for the Dems, but for the democracy.

That horrible criminal goes around giving seminars on ETHICS, if you can believe it.

I want his head on a pike. In my living room.

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Is anyone trying to hold him accountable? I hope so. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Not that I know of -- Botany would know more.
Sometimes these things take time -- as in the Plame outing.

He WILL pay for this. I hope it's just a matter of how soon. It was so blatant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-05 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Not only was it incomplete....
the portion that was performed was NOT random, as required by law, and the auditing was obstructed by blocking access to poll books, etc.

I would disagree with the idea that "it started alright". It was obstructed from the git-go.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoBushSpokenHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-05 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Oh, I didn't mean alright in that context sorry .....
Just meant, yes, the recount started...nothing was right about the recount. Many inconsistancies found. Many violations of the law. Well documented outright violations of the law and admissions of violations of the law. And, they say there isn't proof...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kensingtonian Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
6. only two of Ohio's 88 counties
actually complied with the law regarding recounts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. And one of them "found" lots of Kerry votes, too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
8. Clermont, Warren, others struggled with meaning of "random"
just ask a teenager...what a bunch of clowns at the boards, they will be featured in documentaries inthe future about people who sold out their country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
10. it was done illegally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoBushSpokenHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Why would they stop a recount prematurely and violate
the law, if the election was not fraudulent?

Yes, garybeck and I know the answer to the question, do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Aug 29th 2014, 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC