Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is it a terribly slow day today or what? It seems to be a slow news

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 01:01 AM
Original message
Is it a terribly slow day today or what? It seems to be a slow news
Edited on Thu Nov-03-05 01:04 AM by texpatriot2004
day and a sluggish day in general here. All day I have been checking in but...not much happening. What's up? The calm before the storm maybe.

Where is everyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lildreamer316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. We are just used to the last few days
/weeks with everything. This is probably just normal.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
expatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. last few months, really.... my head hasn't stopped spinning from
"news rush" since Katrina.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. Post Halloween let down?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. Have you seen this?
CLOSE READING DEPT.
SCOOTER’S SEX SHOCKER
Issue of 2005-11-07
Posted 2005-10-31


Of all the scribbled sentences that have converged to create the Valerie Plame affair, the most remarkable, in literary terms, may belong to Scooter Libby, Dick Cheney’s recently deposed chief of staff. “Out West, where you vacation, the aspens will already be turning. They turn in clusters, because their roots connect them. Come back to work—and life,” he wrote in a jailhouse note to Judith Miller. Meant as a waiver of confidentiality, the letter touched off the sort of fevered exegesis more often associated with readings of “The Waste Land” than of legal correspondence. For even more difficult prose, however, one must revisit an earlier work. “The Apprentice”—Libby’s 1996 entry in the long and distinguished annals of the right-wing dirty novel—tells the tale of Setsuo, a courageous virgin innkeeper who finds himself on the brink of love and war.

Libby has a lot to live up to as a conservative author of erotic fiction. As an article in SPY magazine pointed out in 1988, from Safire (“ finally came to him in the bed and shouted ‘Arragghrrorwr!’ in his ear, bit his neck, plunged her head between his legs and devoured him”) to Buckley (“I’d rather do this with you than play cards”) to Liddy (“T’sa Li froze, her lips still enclosing Rand’s glans . . .”) to Ehrlichman (“ ‘It felt like a little tongue’ ”) to O’Reilly (“Okay, Shannon Michaels, off with those pants”), extracurricular creative writing has long been an outlet for ideas that might not fly at, say, the National Prayer Breakfast. In one of Lynne Cheney’s books, a Republican vice-president dies of a heart attack while having sex with his mistress.

It took Libby more than twenty years to write “The Apprentice,” which is set in a remote Japanese province in the winter of 1903. The book is brimming with quasi-political intrigue and antique locutions—“The girl who wore the cloak of yellow fur”; “one wore backward a European hat”—that make the phrase a “former Hill staffer,” by comparison, seem straightforward.

Like his predecessors, Libby does not shy from the scatological. The narrative makes generous mention of lice, snot, drunkenness, bad breath, torture, urine, “turds,” armpits, arm hair, neck hair, pubic hair, pus, boils, and blood (regular and menstrual). One passage goes, “At length he walked around to the deer’s head and, reaching into his pants, struggled for a moment and then pulled out his penis. He began to piss in the snow just in front of the deer’s nostrils.”

Homoeroticism and incest also figure as themes. The main female character, Yukiko, draws hair on the “mound” of a little girl. The brothers of a dead samurai have sex with his daughter. Many things glisten (mouths, hair, evergreens), quiver (a “pink underlip,” arm muscles, legs), and are sniffed (floorboards, sheets, fingers). The cast includes a dwarf, and an “assistant headman” who comes to restore order after a crime at the inn. (Might this character be autobiographical? And, if so, would that have made Libby the assistant headman or the assistant headman’s assistant?)

When it comes to depicting scenes of romance, however, Libby can evoke a sort of musty sweetness; while one critic deemed “The Apprentice” “reminiscent of Rembrandt,” certain passages can better be described as reminiscent of Penthouse Forum. There is, for example, Yukiko’s seduction of the inexperienced apprentice:

He could feel her heart beneath his hands. He moved his hands slowly lower still and she arched her back to help him and her lower leg came against his. He held her breasts in his hands. Oddly, he thought, the lower one might be larger. . . . One of her breasts now hung loosely in his hand near his face and he knew not how best to touch her.


Other sex scenes are less conventional. Where his Republican predecessors can seem embarrassingly awkward—the written equivalent of trying to cop a feel while pinning on a corsage—Libby is unabashed:

At age ten the madam put the child in a cage with a bear trained to couple with young girls so the girls would be frigid and not fall in love with their patrons. They fed her through the bars and aroused the bear with a stick when it seemed to lose interest.


And, finally:

He asked if they should fuck the deer.


The answer, reader, is yes.

So, how does Libby stack up against the competition? This question was put to Nancy Sladek, the editor of Britain’s Literary Review, which, each year, holds a contest for bad sex writing in fiction. (In 1998, someone nominated the Starr Report.) Sladek agreed to review a few passages from Libby. “That’s a bit depraved, isn’t it, this kind of thing about bears and young girls? That’s particularly nasty, and the other ones are just boring,” she said. “God, they’re an odd bunch, these Republicans.” Unlike their American counterparts, she said, Tories haven’t taken much to sex writing. “They usually just get caught,” she said.







COMMENT

CLOSE READING DEPT.

EXTRA!

AIR QUALITY REPORT

THE FINANCIAL PAGE




— Lauren Collins
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Scooter is a perverse sicko. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. British slime
Edited on Thu Nov-03-05 02:36 AM by slaveplanet
that's what


Nancy Sladek, the editor of Britain’s Literary Review, which, each year, holds a contest for bad sex writing in fiction. (In 1998, someone nominated the Starr Report.) Sladek agreed to review a few passages from Libby. “That’s a bit depraved, isn’t it, this kind of thing about bears and young girls? That’s particularly nasty, and the other ones are just boring,” she said. “God, they’re an odd bunch, these Republicans.” Unlike their American counterparts, she said, Tories haven’t taken much to sex writing. “They usually just get caught,” she said.

they may get caught for sex...buuut...

So, now for Todays underreported news-

Seems the pommie Brits aren't above playing the Luxemborg card as they rape the planet...ever wonder why they won't be caught for that?

Camilla Rothchiild and Charles all over our news with their boy king....but not a word of this....
-----------------------------------------------

3.15pm
BCCI liquidators drop case against Bank

Mark Tran and agencies
Wednesday November 2, 2005

One of the longest and most expensive lawsuits in British history collapsed today as liquidators for the rogue bank BCCI dropped their case against the Bank of England.
The liquidators - accountants Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu - dropped the case after the chancellor of the high court said it was no longer in the best interests of creditors for the litigation to continue.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.guardian.co.uk/bcci/story/0,14169,1607012,00.html

The rest is triumphalism by the Establishment.

It's no coincidence this has happened at this moment in time. It's the Plame case and its Iran Contra roots that lead straight to BCCI.

Look at the evidence in the creditors hands.



------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lord Bingham, now Britain's most senior law lord, concluded that over-worked Bank of England regulators had made an innocent mistake when they designated BCCI a Luxembourg bank in 1980. They had done so despite the fact that it was no secret that BCCI's Luxembourg holding company was a little more than a brass plate, with most meaningful operations run out of offices at 100 Leadenhall Street in the City - a stone's throw from the Bank of England. Lord Bingham said: "In applying this new and unfamiliar statutory regime , it was necessary for the Bank, first of all, to understand what was meant by 'principal place of business'. That was a legal question. "Those who handled this matter in the Bank had many applications to process in a very limited time, and did not recognise this as a question to be asked. So no legal advice was sought ... The question was simply never addressed."

Mr Pollock will challenge this conclusion, pointing to internal Bank papers, seen by the Guardian, which appear to show senior banking supervision officials and lawyers had indeed, from the outset, raised the question of whether BCCI should be more appropriately classified as a British bank. As early as February 1979 Frank Hall, a senior lawyer at the Bank, wrote an internal memo to colleagues concerning the imminent Banking Act. In it he said: "I should be grateful if you could let me know whether ... there are any companies which are not registered in the UK but which have their principal place of business or place of central management or control here ... but which we should not want to recognise."

Copies of the memo, which was circulated among senior department officials, show several hand-written annotations. "I can't think of any, can you?" says one, to which another official replies: "No." "But for this - BCCI?" appears in the sidelines, written in the hand of Peter Cooke, the head of banking supervision. Mr Pollock will argue this critical exchange fits into a catalogue of alarming internal reports on BCCI, each of which ended in the Bank wringing its hands behind closed doors but ultimately shirking its regulatory responsibilities.
He is likely to stop short of direct criticism of Lord Bingham, but his remarks may, at the very least, call into question the fullness of information supplied by the Bank to the Bingham inquiry.
A string of other internal memos make clear the Bank's state of panic. In 1982 BCCI was described as "on its way to becoming the financial equivalent of the SS Titanic!".

Another paper from the same year insists BCCI's status as a Luxembourg bank "has always been something of a fiction ... I believe it would be wrong for us to continue to allow a large international banking group to carry on business on a largely unsupervised basis". The following year yet another Bank analyst wrote a report on BCCI entitled "Why action is now urgently required". It suggested the Bank was left with "two basic choices": to close BCCI down or to insist it be redesignated a UK bank, under full Bank of England supervision.

Later memos, Mr Pollock may suggest, show shades of cowardice behind the Bank's intransigence. "It is hard to see how we can to other than turn a blind eye ... since we have accepted up to now," wrote one Bank official as the charade of BCCI's Luxembourg status wore increasingly thin.
Mr Cooke himself even described the late BCCI chairman Agha Abedi as "the living personification of Uriah Heep".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
4. Basking as the general population turns on Bush
Day by day, minute by minute, Bushco is sliding into the abyss. I'm enjoying it :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. It is odd ,
but not unappreciated. The Republicans in control cannot govern. Everyone is sick of these people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carolinalady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. at Mrs. Parks funeral.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. True. May she rest in peace. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
10. Hard at work ...

After the events of yesterday, the media is a bit lost. They had a script all ready to go for today, of course, but that naughty boy Reid's antics upset those plans. So, the corporate masters have things kind of in a holding pattern while the WH manfactures something appropriate for them to read to us.

And while I'm guessing a bit, I'm not really joking.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC