Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did a REAL investigation happen because REAL damage to more than 1 agent?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 10:32 PM
Original message
Did a REAL investigation happen because REAL damage to more than 1 agent?
The value of a single career shut down must be huge. But many have wondered whether there were actual lives lost, and whether the Brewster-Jennings front was shut down intentionally.
Fitzgerald didn't give us an answer (when asked "what kind of damage occurred?"), and we will probably never know.

But watching the Fitzgerald press conference, I was especially riveted by his response and his expressions in answer to that question. And I wondered, if one or more assets lost their lives as a result, whether there is any way that the CIA could even stay GOVERNABLE at that point -- whether the annoyance, resentment and rift with the White House that existed prior to the leak would have simply exploded if this had NOT been truly investigated and punished?

Living a covert life as an agent must make the treachery of this leak intolerable whether or not deaths resulted. And Fitzgerald also pointed out the simplest scenario, where simply reducing the number of applicants to the agency was a real form of damage.

***************************************************************
QUESTION: Mr. Fitzgerald, you've said that there was damage done to all of us, damage to the entire nation. Can you be any more specific about what kind of damage you're talking about?

FITZGERALD: The short answer is no. But I can just say this: I'm not going to comment on things beyond what's said in the indictment.

I can say that for the people who work at the CIA and work at other places, they have to expect that when they do their jobs that classified information will be protected. And they have to expect that when they do their jobs, that information about whether or not they are affiliated with the CIA will be protected.

And they run a risk when they work for the CIA that something bad could happen to them, but they have to make sure that they don't run the risk that something bad is going to happen to them from something done by their own fellow government employees.

But getting to the specifics of the damage, I won't.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. and we know that it isn't just agents in place now--this situation has
damaged the ability of the CIA to get anyone in other countries to work as "human intelligence", thus weakening our ability to gather accurate information.

but then, this administration thinks it is okay to make things up out of whole cloth, foregoing the need for "humint" or any sort of intelligence at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ray McGovern
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 10:38 PM by FogerRox
24 years CIA-- said there was a post mortem done by the CIA-- in essence you do a post mortem when someone dies--

SO at least one is dead 'cause of Plamegate-- & The DCI made a criminal referal to the DOJ.

thats how this got started
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I heard him on Randi the other day.
He definitely seemed to think there had been more than just a small amount of damage done by this outing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Oh thanks, I hadn't heard that. I've not heard Ray in a while.. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aimah Donating Member (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think he means damage to Americans trust of the govt...
and the safety of agents. That's the meaning I got when I heard it initially.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, there were the 8 blank pages in the DC Court of Appeals
Opinion in the Miller case. All of the judges were plainly disturbed about something. One can only wonder if that involved the consequences to Brewster Jennings and the people involved with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I also wonder about Brewster-Jennings as a possible MOTIVE.
The hypothesis that the BFEE wanted -- more than revenge for Wilson's opposition and setting an example for others--to take down an effective spying operation that was focused on nuclear weapons smuggling is interesting to me. Especially in light of various vague comments made by Sibel Edmonds like in this interview.

http://www.antiwar.com/deliso/?articleid=6934
But I can tell you there are a lot of people involved, a lot of ranking officials, and a lot of illegal activities that include multi-billion-dollar drug-smuggling operations, black-market nuclear sales to terrorists and unsavory regimes, you name it. And of course a lot of people from abroad are involved. It's massive. So to do this investigation, to really do it, they will have to look into everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KerryOn Donating Member (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. Here is a list of consequences that I came up with....
The way I see it theres a lot more to it then the lives of CIA agents.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x5215305
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. From MSNBC: CIA mum on damage done by Plame outing
snip:
A small Boston company listed as her employer suddenly was shown to be a bogus CIA front, and her alma mater in Belgium discovered it was a favored haunt of an American spy. At Langley, officials in the clandestine service quickly began drawing up a list of contacts and friends, cultivated over more than a decade, to triage any immediate damage

snip:
Intelligence officials said they would never reveal the true extent of her contacts to protect the agency and its work.

"You'll never get a straight answer about how valuable she was or how valuable her sources were," said one intelligence official who would speak only anonymously.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9856806
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. one might also consider that Ms Plame has never defended herself in public
And ask your self why?

Because she is undercover--- she is not allowed to say squat- prohibited by her bosses at the CIA----
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC