Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

theory based on pretty much nothing: here's why Libby lied ...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 06:53 PM
Original message
theory based on pretty much nothing: here's why Libby lied ...
see if this makes any sense ...

i'm no lawyer but it seems like Libby had to make a choice when he was called before the Grand Jury ... he could have testified, as he did, or he could have taken the Fifth Amendment on the grounds that his testimony could have incriminated him ...

so why would he choose to testify and then tell such obvious lies? you can quickly rule out the idea he held out some vague hope Fitzgerald wouldn't be able to prove he was lying ... the lies were incredibly clumsy ... he had to know he was setting himself up for a conviction on very serious charges ...

again, why would he do such a stupid thing ???

the theory? perhaps he decided to fall on his sword to protect Cheney ... who knows what kind of millions might have been promised to him and his family ... if he had refused to testify claiming the Fifth Amendment, they could have offered him immunity from prosecution and forced him to testify ... while it's true he still could have lied at that point, that would have only made the charges more severe ... and if he testified and told the truth, he might well have pulled down the entire administration ...

it looks like the plea bargain Libby cut was with Cheney and maybe bush instead of with Fitzgerald ... and, of course, sitting at the back end of all this is the possibility of a presidential pardon ...

so, the theory is that Libby lied knowing that he would become the fall guy to protect Cheney and perhaps bush ... let's hope they don't get away with it ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. inconcievable to me. as he knew he was risking jail. no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. A promised pardon could go a long way.... perhaps? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. My fear too.
... but wouldn't pleading the 5th do the same thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Dunno..... not a legal type... this stuff amazes me to no end and
I am happy to just breathe it all in... and watch the system work its magic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Magic? Just don't look behind the curtain. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Oh no... wouldn't want to ruin the show.... :) nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigYawn Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Nope..pleading the 5th would have deflected the investigation to
other higher up's such as Cheney & Rove. Scooter agreed to take
the fall for a pardon by Bush. Scooter will never see inside of a jail,
or it will be just a very short time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. These guys see themselves as noble guardians.........
of the American way. Their egos are only overshadowed by their bank accounts. Look at Gordon Liddy, Ollie North and that lot. These guys would do prison time in a nano-second, hell they'd jump on a hand-grenade to save their "mission". :eyes:

They're fucking nuts :silly: and I CAN see Libby doing this, especially if they told him he'd be taken care of monetarily. There's only one thing that can trump their egos, and that's a fat back account.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think Libby lied to protect Cheney
Plus, he didn't think he'd get caught because he assumed Miller would never testify.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Tucker Carlson saying Libby is a solid with facts as Fitz--he is asking
this very question also. msnbc now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. there were at least 7 meetings where Plame was discussed. before
Novak wrote his article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. He lied to protect his patron DarthBypass- and perhaps there was
a bigger crime under neath it all, bigger than the 5 counts.

Clearly, Scooter would not reveal why they leaked Plames name, that's a fact (in the Indictment). This was the bigger deal- perhaps it would have exposed many other untruths about the war- the ones we have been talking about for a long time.

The false WMD stories, lies from Chalabi, lies about the Un inspectors finding anything....we went to war for reasons other than stated by shrubco.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. "war for reasons other than stated"
this exact phrase sits at the core of my calls for immediate withdrawal ...

but the argument is not historical ... the argument is that if we went to "war for reasons other than stated" initially, why would anyone believe bush has abandoned his original motives?

by supporting even one more day in Iraq, all Democrats are doing, no matter how noble their objectives may be, is enabling bush another day to try to further his "other than stated" objectives ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demoiselle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. Conventional political wisdom says that....
it is political suicide for a government official to "take the Fifth" in such an investigation. They, after all, are supposed to be serving us and therefore their behavior is very much the public's business. The Fifth is a perfectly legitimate shelter for private citizens...but not for one of the most powerful officials in the Federal Government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. I think it is much simpler than that
Libby's first lies were told to the FBI BEFORE Fitzgerald was appointed and WHILE Ashcroft was in charge. Libby's hubris and the track record of the bush admin's ability to stop investigations in their tracks as long as the person in charge was a partisan as was Ashcroft.

Once the investigation became truly independent, Libby's lies under oath were already recorded and he continued to stand by his lies in subsequent appearances to testify. Libby is a very arrogant, egotistical man and believed he could carry on lying with impunity. He was wrong as has been proven by the 5 indictments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. ding ding ding.....
get that man a prize!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
16. i agree with your theory...it matches my own. all you need to know about
the Bushes is they have long required that anyone working for them pledge to lay their body down over any grenade directed at them.

That's not just a tale... they really do say it like that. You have to throw your body at any grenade headed for Bush. BoyBush required that for anyone who would work for his father and later, for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
17. makes some sense
Maybe he did realize he was setting himself up to take the fall. But I tend to think that he arrogantly thought he would get away with lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC