Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

HOW could Plame or Wilson be indicted? Seriously, not joking.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BloodyWilliam Donating Member (665 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:08 PM
Original message
HOW could Plame or Wilson be indicted? Seriously, not joking.
I keep hearing from Freepers and rightwing Farkers that Fitz is going to indict Wilson and Plame and it's blowing my mind. Um... okay, am I missing something? Is there any way, any reason for the good ambassador and his wife to be indicted for anything? I haven't heard anything specific from the wingnuts, but is there any way they would be indicted?

By what twisted legal stretch, no matter how deranged, could Valerie Plame or Joe Wilson be possibly indicted for? Is there any feasible way they could be found of any wrongdoing?

Maybe it's just my paranoia talking. Actually, it IS my paranoia talking. Although I do realize how completely insane these Freepers are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. In their world,
anyone who speaks against the Second Coming (the name some of them use for Bush) should not only be indicted, but convicted, drawn, and quartered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why don't you ask the Freepers - no one here thinks the way they do.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. you've got to be kidding?
people saying that are in deep, deep denial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oreo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. How dare they!
Allowing people to out them and doing all that un-amurikan questioning of the WH.

They're trying to justify their petty lives right now... ignore them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. For making the little cowboy cry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BloodyWilliam Donating Member (665 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. If it wasn't for the GWB photoshopped head, that pic would be adorable
As it is, I'm imagining him clinging to some old guy's chest and predicting the reagonomics future, like that midget mutant dude from Total Recall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the_spectator Donating Member (932 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. Is there ANY indication that Wilson testified before the Grand Jury?
Even once? If not, this HAS to be total BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. Stop listening to them
It is impossible. They are the VICTIMS in all this.

What the crazy people are doing is often termed "whistling in the dark." They are frightened, so they are constructing a world view to ameliorate their fears.

Thou shalt not be so suggestible!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BloodyWilliam Donating Member (665 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. The closest thing to a reason I've heard was...
something like "running a CIA operation against the president during a campaign." :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Again, stop listening to them
Ignore them, smile, laugh, change the subject, whatever.

Don't confront--far better to let them get hit up the backside of the head with a two by four. Confronting them with facts would only prepare them for the inevitable, encourage a fortress mentality, and allow them to marshal arguments in mitigation. I personally would prefer that they have the rug yanked out from under them...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. Ask them and come and tell us.
I'm kind of interested to know myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gp Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. Joe and Valerie will be indicted because...
and i quote from http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1509658/posts


It could be he's looking for more info from Rove to help indict Plame for running a CIA-based operation against the president during a campaign season.

6 posted on 10/26/2005 11:17:06 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)



:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BloodyWilliam Donating Member (665 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Blast! one minute late to post!
:toast:

These are some really fucking deranged people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. a CIA-based operation against the President during the campaign?
and this information came from... where? I smell flop sweat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. Oh WOW.
So let me see if I've got this right.

Joe Wilson and Valerie Plame are part of a CIA-based cabal to take down President Bush, and that's really what this is all about.

Wow, and I thought WE were running heavy on the tinfoil. :tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. We live in an age where tinfoil hat theories are given credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KC21304 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
27. Or it could be that xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and
Proud of it!} is too stupid for words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. Stop flying over the coo coo's nest. Mental illness will rub off on you.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. I agree
If you hang with the nutcases youll take on their nuttiness.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. That is probably why this whole Niger business went as far as it did
Fortress mentality at sixteen hundred Penn!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
14. Becasue Wilson and Plame are really Libby and Rove, thats how, deep cover
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tamarin Donating Member (337 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
15. Just guessing.....
but, supposedly the CIA hates this administration and the Wilsons tried to undermine the admin.'s reasons for war because of this hatred. That's all I have been able to determine, not sure if it is correct and don't know how that would translate to charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
17. The right wing chatter plan is to confuse the average listener.
They are in full court press with their lies. Fitzgerald will persevere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Like I told my twelve yr old
Rove/Bush/ Cheny told America that Mrs Plame was a secret agent.

Keep it simple/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. DING! one correct answer
They are trying to raise the possibility so that the talk leading up to what ever happens includes this. It kills time and plants "There are questions you know..." in people's heads or at least tries to. I didn't work in the Schiavo debacle and it hasn't worked here-even MSM won't care THAT water for them.

Also it will be at least for a while its own cottage industry. Someone will write a book on it and Regenery will publish it and the author will go on all the shows and so forth.

Lastly-this also serves to convict them of something no one has accused them of. They are trying to taint Wilson and Plame (didn't take his name you know ;-) ) like you would in a rape case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Yes!
I'll have what he's drinking! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
19. Because they DARED to question the emperor, of course
It's just NOT done. It messes with his sunny nobility. We can't have that can we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eallen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
22. They're moonbats. They live in an alternate reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
25. What are the possibilities?
I mean, what could anybody be indicted for in this case?

Let's discount the 'CIA conspiracy' entirely; if so, he'd have called in a different set of people for testimony.

Perjury and obstruction of justice. There's no indication that Wilson or Plame have testified or been subpoenaed for evidence. So unlesst there's something subtle I'm missing, we can rule those possibilities out.

Divulging a covert operative's name and blowing her cover? Well, Wilson certainly knew it. And so did Plame. But I have trouble imaging that an operative could be prosecuted for self-outing.

Could Wilson have done so? Presumably. There have been statements in stories that for a few weeks prior to his writing his NYT piece he'd been talking to people. "Agitating", so to speak, without the pejorative connotation the word has. Could he have mentioned something that ineluctably led to his wife's cover being blown, and could Fitzgerald have come up with a lot of witnesses making Wilson's testimony irrelevant? Sure. And it could even explain why they'd go around again questioning their neighbors. But I'd suspect that the prosecutor would still want to get the target's testimony on the record.

I can't think of anything that we actually *know* (as opposed to the endless leaks of confidential that most of us seem to be hankering after ... ironic, in a GJ investigation over the leak of confidential information) that indicates either is likely to be indicted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
28. The lines of reasoning the freeps
are using is wishful thinking at best.

On other(Independent minded) blogs i've seen ...The story basically hashes out like this:

Joe Wilson & Valerie Plame really suffered no Ill effects from the outing, quite to the contrary they were enriched and made out to be heroic. This is a stark contrast to David Kelly who died in despair or met with more ominous circumstances. In addition The operation B-J had it's sites on (AQ Kahn ) that covert CIA operation was all but wrapping up shop on or before the SOTU
in mid January 2003...so all this had led to speculation of Plames true role in all this. So some blogs have speculated that she wanted to come in from the cold, she was pregnant, to settle down for family and cash in on the notoriety. Further they speculate she was a willing pawn in the goal of shutting down the associates of B-J.

It gets way more detailed from there as they attempt to fill in the blanks of the many unanswered questions that are still out there...some of it quite convincing.

all that is a far cry from what freepers are saying , but I think they have taken some of the themes of it and bastardized it to their own purposes...as is always their MO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hvn_nbr_2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
31. Malfunction in the wormhole transporter mechanism.
Their bodies are here but their minds are wrapped up in a cowpie burrito in some alternative reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC