|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
recoveringrepublican (779 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 05:26 PM Original message |
Need info Re: "Fuck" as freedom of speech. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RubyDuby in GA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
1. It may be up to the area that you're in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClintonTyree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 05:35 PM Response to Original message |
2. I used to live right off US-19 on Drew Street.......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
recoveringrepublican (779 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 06:24 PM Response to Reply #2 |
21. We have a legal fund started since the last arrest on Aug 6 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 05:36 PM Response to Original message |
3. I have no problem with laws against public obscenity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 05:48 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. And, see, I'm just the opposite. I believe all profanity laws should be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 06:08 PM Response to Reply #3 |
15. Deleted message |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 06:29 PM Response to Reply #15 |
25. Oh really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 06:34 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. Just because your idea of obscenity banning is popular, doesn't make it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Somawas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 05:36 PM Response to Original message |
4. There's a case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aint_no_life_nowhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 05:39 PM Response to Original message |
5. Google the Supreme Court case Cohen v. California |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
recoveringrepublican (779 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 06:24 PM Response to Reply #5 |
22. Thank you very much. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Somawas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 06:30 PM Response to Reply #5 |
27. Cohen v. California. That's what I was thinking of. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
7P Dude (150 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
6. On another note... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troubleinwinter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 06:06 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. It expresses a person's view. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
7P Dude (150 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 06:19 PM Response to Reply #14 |
20. I realize that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troubleinwinter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 07:03 PM Response to Reply #20 |
35. "too immature to get your point across in a rational manner." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troubleinwinter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 06:08 PM Response to Reply #6 |
16. Ask Cheney. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
recoveringrepublican (779 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 06:26 PM Response to Reply #6 |
23. I'm not saying I agreed with it, only I defend his right to say it, just |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
7. Context. Supreme Court case Cohen V. California (1971) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
recoveringrepublican (779 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 06:30 PM Response to Reply #7 |
26. Thank you also nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 06:39 PM Response to Reply #7 |
33. Good ideas, be determined, but you can be cuntersued for malicious suits. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 05:45 PM Response to Original message |
8. From Wikipedia |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 06:00 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. The Colorado Springs one is funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogmarch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 06:02 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. I don't know about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluedawg12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
10. The derivation of the F-bomb |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 06:02 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Really? I heard a different origin of it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skooooo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 06:10 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. According to the Oxford English Dictionary.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 06:18 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Well, f*ck, we're all wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msongs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 07:18 PM Response to Reply #17 |
36. fuck = for unlawful carnal knowledge -> |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timtom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 06:15 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. I'm sorry, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluedawg12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 10:29 PM Response to Reply #18 |
37. Well, this was a scholarly and lively bit of entomology |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 06:29 PM Response to Original message |
24. If there is no obscenity worth banning, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
28. I'm wearing my "Pure Fuckin Rock" Queensryche shirt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pitohui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
30. well it prob. is up to the courts to decide |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Berserker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 06:37 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Thanks posters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skooooo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 06:38 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Fuckin- A! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aint_no_life_nowhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-22-05 06:46 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. The police could be enforcing an unconstitutional law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-23-05 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
38. I have no problem w/ the public use of the word "fuck", especially |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tsiyu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-23-05 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
39. I only have one thing to say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:35 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC