Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OK. So Who Ordered The Soldiers To Lie?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 07:52 AM
Original message
OK. So Who Ordered The Soldiers To Lie?
In an earlier thread, the following facts were set out:

1) The photo-op appeared scripted.
2) The satellite feed of the rehearsals were discovered.
3) The MSM is now hammering that they KNOW the thing was scripted.
4) Prior to the release of that video by MSM, soliders told reporters it wasn't scripted.
5) The White House has admitted it was scripted.

So, the following blank is not yet filled. How could soldiers who were reading from a script and rehearsing the bit, not know the thing was scripted? The answer is they can't.

So the big questions: Who ordered those soldiers to lie to the reporters and how far up the CofC do those orders go?

Somebody tried to lie to the press and the whole of the american people and ORDERED soldiers in Iraq to participate in the lie. I want to know "WHO DONE IT?"
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Debau2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. According to the Today Show this morning
Supposedly the White House knew nothing about this being scripted!
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Then The Other Thread Was Wrong
Sorry, but that was one of the points in the other thread. If it's wrong, then it's wrong.

However, how could they not know it was scripted if they rehearsed it? What exactly were they rehearsing, aside from the script? How to use a microphone?
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debau2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. No, I am not saying that
the I think the WH did not know, I was just repeating what the WH told the Today show. I absolutely believe that * knew. One of the excuses given to have it scripted, was the time difference and the satellite delay, so that soldiers would know what to expect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. Then why was Bush reading from a script?
If you watch it again (hard, I know - it was so gruesome) you'll see Bush looking down at pages on the podium before every "question" and in one case he read directly from his notes.

It was certainly "scripted" from the WH end of it - and given the prompting of the soldiers beforehand, they too were "scripted". Had nothing to do with the satellite feed - it was another dog and pony show, period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debau2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Well
You don't expect the WH to admit they are idiots even when caught? Look at Scotty's attempt at a Press Conference yesterday!! hahaha

I finally had to turn it off, I laughed so hard I had the hiccups!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. I know...
I kept waiting for someone to ask Scotty if DoD had given Bush his script. I mean, he was reading directly from it. How can the White House claim ignorance that it was entirely scripted? It's like, who will the public believe, Scotty or their lyin' eyes?

They really do think we're stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #15
28. exactly, how can he have his answers ready.....
Edited on Fri Oct-14-05 09:05 AM by notadmblnd
if he doesn't know what the questions are? Spokespeople for the WH tried to say it wasn't scripted, just choreographed. Doesn't seem to me to be much of a difference. Besides, how many people do you know (other than bush) that stumble over words that contain more than 4 syllables when they are speaking naturally?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. Ah! I Misread Your Other Post
Then we're in complete agreement.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debau2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. He could not even
keep the earpiece in his ear for heavens sake. He is just a buffoon!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shoelace414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. they also said they knew nothing about the mission accomplished thing
until they were finally caught red handed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Yes. They wanted the soldiers to prep so they could appear
"articulate" before the Commander In Sleep. I laughed out loud at that excuse.

This was after showing that Pentagram witch telling the one guy how to breathe, as if to appear natural. It was also funny that they prepared a go-to guy in case the Dunce went off script.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
29. Since Bush had to deliver the scripted questions, it's not possible for
the White House not to have known. That's ridiculous on its face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. My guess is the WH spoke w/ Rummy who gave orders to the military command
Edited on Fri Oct-14-05 07:59 AM by CottonBear
to order the soldiers to cooperate with the organizers of the staged event. The soldiers did what they were ordered to do, which apparently included lying to the press when asked about the staging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Not Blaming The Soliders
Not at all. But, somewhere, someone must be accountable for intentionally lying to the american people. Remember during the late 90's, "It's not about the sex, it's about the lying." Well, the shoe's on the other foot now.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. or risk
ending up in GITMO or next to the soldiers who were ORDERED to torture Abu Ghirab detainees
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matt819 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. You think we'll see a CNN website poll?
Edited on Fri Oct-14-05 08:02 AM by matt819
Here's the question:

Who do you think scripted and directed the * teleconference with the soliders?
*
Rummy
Some low-level enlisted person in Baghdad - we don't know who, but he is no higher than a Pfc - who did this on his own and did not clear it with his superiors, who knew nothing - we repeat, nothing - about the scripting of the event, even though everyone was caught in rehearsals. And, besides, the American people are stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
10. A more interesting and perhaps more important...
...question is who allowed the rehearsal to go out into the ether to be picked up by the news organizations? The answer to that might be quite interesting and informative. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #10
31. REUTERS. THey're not very happy about all their dead reporters
shot by US troops, and the 3 Reuters reporters bush ordered "disappeared" in Iraq.

Fuck with the media at your own risk.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #10
53. whoever did it probably is getting fired. . .EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
11. The WH is NEVER going to risk a live unscripted
Edited on Fri Oct-14-05 08:01 AM by HereSince1628
conversation.

Frankly I think its more interesting to ask why the press would make a big deal of this now.

The reality is that these things have been going on for years and years. Every Sunday the talking heads show up with practiced lines and intended messages, and it is passed off as a live unscripted interview.

Why does the media need to look tough now? Is this a response to Katrina's pulling back the curtain? Bush's low poll numbers? Or is the press setting themselves up to look able to handle a coming storm from Plamegate?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Blood In The Water, My Friend
This idiot has been given a free pass since 9/11. If that hadn't happened, he would have vilified in the press for the buffoon he is. That free pass extended all the way until so many things got so screwed up that the american people are, in great majority, no longer fooled.

The press is now free to be the press, because the puppet masters at the media conglomerates now see no profitability risk in dumping on Silverspoon. The risk of being complicit is greater than the risk of dumping on a Repub prez.

Besides, these companies are not doing particularly well in cash flow and P&L analyses. So, maybe some of the bean counters have figured out that there is no advantage, business-wise, to having a Republican empty suit in office.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. Follow the money is always good advice...
is it for advertising profit (which I guess is where my earlier questions fall), or because the pay-offs stopped, or are now being paid by someone demanding to hear a different tune?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. I Don't Buy Pay-offs
The profitability cannot be compromised by being complicit. I'll even give them a pass for the truce after 9/11. OK, it went on WAY too long, but i at least understand that they could not risk seeming hostile, because of the competitive risk.

Now, they can look at their own statements and see that playing nice with this gang has not benefited their bottom lines. They can look at the polls and see 62% (5 out of 8) are not supporting this idiot.

There's now money to be made from exposing this gang of thugs, and they're going to operate in their own self-interest.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #11
23. This has been the most staged
bunch I've ever seen, from the time someone decided to run the chimp* they have done nothing but write scripts, many have backfired, but, they've been able to dodge the bullets so far.
Up till now anyway.

Have you noticed someone put the term choreographed out instead of staged? maybe because the American people understand that staged implies a scripted fantasy, made to order.

You're right Professor we need to follow the lie up the ladder, maybe there is a special group like whig that people should know about, instead of follow the money we follow the lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. Empty Suit
Anybody who still thinks Silverspoon is in charge, or ever has been, is dumber than dirt, and they'll never get it.

The best we can hope for at this point, is that, at least for a while, the major parties will learn that they need to run a real leader and someone who understands and is interested in the mechanics of government and society.

No more dim-bulb puppets would be a good thing.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
12. Who was the woman who was coaching the soldiers?
I didn't catch her title. Was she part of the DOD or the White House staff? Anyone know?

Also I noticed that Bush apparently strayed from HIS script which really threw the soldiers off. There were a number of questions that he asked, to which the soldiers responded with answers that really didn't match the question. Very odd.

And that Iraqi soldier who said, "I likes yous" was a hoot. The whole thing came off like a SNL skit, complete with the part where Bush loudly drops his ear piece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #12
24. Her last name is Barber, and she is a Pentagon
DoD Rumsfeld flunkie. Understudy PR person.

I can understand that they need to choreograph who needs to speak when, in what order, etc. But to claim it was unscripted was absurd. These people are bad actors. ANd you guys are right: they should never let Bush have a mike without a script.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. Why?
Sorry Ilsa, but i don't buy it. They could give the soldiers, in an unscripted, unrehearsed session one direction: When the director ("This guy right here") points at you, ask your question. That's it.

That requires no rehearsal, no scripting, nothing. Of course, that would mean the soldiers were allowed to ask their own questions, and we know that didn't happen either.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #27
39. the soldiers weren't asking..
they were "answering" ..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. Same Question
That a distinction without a difference. You know what i meant.

When a question is asked, the director points. The soldier he points at answers. End of direction necessary. No rehearsal are required no matter who's asking and who's answering.

The only reason to have a rehearsal is to go over the script.

The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatever4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
13. I watched that press conference with Scotty, DOD done it
And he said, repeatedly, DOD. I don't know how many times, but it had to be at least half a dozen.

In fact, he was asked, repeatedly, and kept on trying to insist there was no scripting. He was hounded over it, and, it's pretty telling that the story is the scripting, and not of how hard the WH tried to deny it. It's a story all by itself; THEN WHY DID YOU TRY TO LIE ABOUT IT SCOTTY???

I don't think he actually ever admitted to it, in fact. I didn't hear him admit to scripting in that conference. I hooted LOUD and LONG when CNN came out as said they did. Said it anyway. Near as I can see, they never did actually admit to it, and I'm left wondering if CNN, since they had footage of the soldiers being coached, just went ahead and said they admitted to it? Did CNN climb out on a limb with this one?? Did CNN hit them with their own "I'll lie and you go ahead and try to prove me wrong...but I'm CNN, fat good luck on making America believe WE lied and YOU told the truth.." Because I never heard them admit to the scripting of it, did anyone else hear the WH admit to it? Seriously, I never heard Scotty fess up. He went WAY out on trying to NOT admit to it. They tried REAL hard to lie about this, it ought to be attacked as well.

What he basically said, was, DOD done it. Ask them. Ask the DOD. And that's all he would say. He point blank denied it was scripted, and said DOD, ask them.

So, who told the DOD, or, did they dream it up themselves? That's the question for me.

Aside from Scotty lying about the scripting, trying so hard to lie even though the facts were right there. Front of god and everybody; why lie Scotty?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #13
45. It couldn't be just the DoD because BUSH delivered half the script! (the
questions)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatever4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #45
54. yup
But that's exactly what he said, old Scotty, at least half a dozen times in front of I don't know how many reporters.

He flat out denied the WH scripted the interview, and he said the DOD did all the selection and any prep for the soldiers.

While he was busy being mad at the lovely Ms Thomas, and saying how very qualified MS Miers is, and religion is a side issue, side issue, side issue...and he forgot what pejorative meant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
18. Herr Goebels is alive and well.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Apparently
Or at least some of his disciples.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #19
51. Splitting hairs here, but they are disciples of Leo Strauss
Never mind the fact that Leo Strauss lifted the blueprints from Herrs Hermann Goering and Joseph Goebbel. I'm just saying.

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
30. Basically, here's my guess on how it works. Senior officer, likely some
Col. or General, picks a group of officers and enlisted that he KNOWS are wingnut shrub supporters already.

Calls them into some private meeting. Tell them he has something important for them to do for the emperor, and goes over what they want out of the briefing.

Wingnut soldiers happily memorize and deliver their lines.

Because the selected soldiers are dedicated wingnuts, they will never narc out the scheme, even when it's exposed like this, they'll say stupid shit like it's spontaneous, my own thoughts etc.

Nothing on paper (heh, script sheets shredded by now). No orders or anything.

Not that complicated really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. And Who Told Your Colonel Or General
I'm shooting high. I don't care about the soldiers involved. I'll assume they did just do what they were told/asked. Who set it up? Who told the General what to do? Who was willing to set up this deal that would have had to, from moment one, involve lying and deception?

Who's the general? Who gave him his orders? Someone needs to be accountable.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. Rove thru Rummy. All telephone/verbal. Nothing in writing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. Then The Reporters Should Be Doing Their Jobs
Get one person, off the record, and corroboration. Put it in the papers. The people need to know this was a high level deception.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #38
40. The thing is, Prof, that everything in the whole shrub presidency has been
fake and scripted like this. Everything. Example all the fake town hall meetings on Social Security etc.

The big difference with this one is that:

1) The charade was actually exposed, and on TV no less, to show the actual rehearsal, revealing "the man behind the curtain"

2) Big media, both network and cable, actually REPORTED on the fakery and exposure.

All the other fakery has been exposed and discussed ad nauseum here and on various blogs etc. but has had very little exposure to the wide wingnut audience.

It gets a little harder to deny when you are staring at video of "Allison" telling Capt. Kenny or whoever, that if the questions run off script, "that'll be your chance to shine. And that won't be a problem for you, will it?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #40
42. Perhaps I'm Not Making My Real Point Properly
The story isn't the scripting. The story is WHO SET IT UP! Now that the blood is in the water and the reporters are now able to report the warts, it's time to get off their 5 year vacation and do some real reporting. Find out WHO did this, all the way to the top.

The blood is the water for these people. Time for them to attack without worrying about access. Access to felons, liars, and thieves is nothing on which to base a career. Exposing felons, liars, and thieves is the basis for a journalism career.

My primary point is, time for the reporters to finally do their job. It's all laid out for them. They just have to follow the trail.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #42
46. Now I understand your point. The answer is, most likely some group that
has been the same people all along, who've scripted the town hall meetings, carrier landing, all of it.

Almost certainly headed either directly or indirectly by Rove, since he's the politics/PR/image/Goebbels guy in a propaganda presidency.

It would be logistically very difficult to run these events with a different group each time, so there's little doubt that Rove probably has a smallish group of people with one or a few key lieutenants to coordinate these things and take care of logistics.

One way to crack into this would be through the Armstrong Williams scenario. Since it's been declared that law was broken there, and U.S. taxpayer money fraudulently spent in this propaganda scheme, there would be grounds for an actual investigation, judicial or congressional, that could start to uncover some of the bugs under some of the rocks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #46
47. Plenty Of Vermin Under Those Rocks
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
32. Here are the TWO biggest LIES>>>
LIE: "You've got tremendous support here at home," Bush said.


Just days before Iraqi voters cast ballots on the draft constitution, 50% of respondents told Pew the decision to go to war was wrong -- up from 44 percent in September.

Roughly the same number said the United States should bring home its forces as soon as possible -- 48 percent -- as keep them there until Iraq is stable -- 47 percent.
__________________________________________
LIE: On the training of Iraqi security forces, Master Sgt. Corine Lombardo from Scotia, N.Y., said to Bush: "I can tell you over the past 10 months, we've seen a tremendous increase in the capabilities and the confidences of our Iraqi security force partners. ... Over the next month, we anticipate seeing at least one-third of those Iraqi forces conducting independent operations."

WASHINGTON (AFP) - The top US commander in
Iraq disclosed that only a single Iraqi battalion is capable of independent operations and acknowledged conditions may worsen there even if a constitution is approved.



http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20050929/wl_mideast_afp/usiraq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
33. Who else? Their commander-in-thief
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
35. It wouldn't surprise me if the soldiers used in this photo op ...
were blackmailed. They probably waved their transfer papers in front of them promising them a chance to go home in exchange for cooperation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatever4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
36. Here's a couple articles about it, "choreographed to match his goals"
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/101405Z.shtml
Bush Teleconference with Soldiers Staged
The Associated Press

Friday 14 October 2005

Washingotn - It was billed as a conversation with U.S. troops, but the questions President Bush asked on a teleconference call Thursday were choreographed to match his goals for the war in Iraq and Saturday's vote on a new Iraqi constitution.

"This is an important time," Allison Barber, deputy assistant defense secretary, said, coaching the soldiers before Bush arrived. "The president is looking forward to having just a conversation with you."

Barber said the president was interested in three topics: the overall security situation in Iraq, security preparations for the weekend vote and efforts to train Iraqi troops.

As she spoke in Washington, a live shot of 10 soldiers from the Army's 42nd Infantry Division and one Iraqi soldier was beamed into the Eisenhower Executive Office Building from Tikrit - the birthplace of former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein.

"I'm going to ask somebody to grab those two water bottles against the wall and move them out of the camera shot for me," Barber said.

A brief rehearsal ensued.

***********************************************
http://www.rawstory.com/ link
Compliments to Bush were entirely staged

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051013/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_iraq_8
WASHINGTON - It was billed as a conversation with U.S. troops, but the questions President Bush asked on a teleconference call Thursday were choreographed to match his goals for the war in
Iraq and Saturday's vote on a new Iraqi constitution.

"This is an important time," Allison Barber, deputy assistant defense secretary, said, coaching the soldiers before Bush arrived. "The president is looking forward to having just a conversation with you."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #36
43. So, Now The Troops Are Props For Silverspoon
That's even worse.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #43
48. They always were
Even if they have to be press-ganged into doing it. The carrier that was used for the Mission Accomplished deck landing had its home port call rescheduled to accomodate Dubya -- family reunions for 1000s were delayed. Hundreds of soldiers had Thanksgiving MREs when Bush shut down the Baghdad mess hall for all but the preselected, who got to enjoy his Plastic Turkey extravaganza.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #48
49. You're Right! Doesn't Make It Less Sickening
Actually makes it more sickening, now that i think about it.

So, supporting the troops and HONORING THEIR SERVICE includes using them as political props. Interesting definition of honor, wouldn't you say?
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #49
52. The dissonance
should've been scraping metal off the mental gears of anyone who's paid the least bit of attention. These years of Playalong With the Leader remind me of nothing less than the mass insanities of the Mao regime -- the Great Leap Forward, Cultural Revolution, et al. It's been fucking frightening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
44. When the female Specialist began speaking, she was thrown off script by *
<snip>
On the training of Iraqi security forces, Master Sgt. Corine Lombardo from Scotia, N.Y., said to Bush: "I can tell you over the past 10 months, we've seen a tremendous increase in the capabilities and the confidences of our Iraqi security force partners. ... Over the next month, we anticipate seeing at least one-third of those Iraqi forces conducting independent operations."

My words here:
It was at the beginning of Lombardo speaking that she mentioned the Nov. 11, 2001 New York event. Bush caught her off guard by asking if she had been there. She momentarily looked confused, stumbled twice in trying to stick to the script, said her scripted lines, and then Bush asked her again if she had been at the 2001 event. She responded she had. He followed this with the stupid response about her looking familiar, and then, per egocentric usual, Bush had to turn the whole thing back to himself by "joking", "I bet I look familiar to you, too...hahahaha!". It was at that point when it became extremely clear that the entire teleconference was disingenuous.


<snip>
Lombardo told the president that she was in New York City on Nov. 11, 2001, when Bush attended an event recognizing soldiers for their recovery and rescue efforts at Ground Zero. She said the troops began the fight against terrorism in the wake of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks and were proud to continue it in Iraq.

"I thought you looked familiar," Bush said, and then joked: "I probably look familiar to you, too."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051013/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_iraq_8&printer=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
50. Somehow the name andrew card
keeps popping into my head, isn't this his venue? He's probably keeping kkkarl's chair warm right now, someone should be looking at who he's been keeping company with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC