To the point where both sides are freaking out about her. Is she "new Bush loyal" with the Jeeeesus and the anti-choice stance? Or is she "old Bush loyal" with the moderate, say anything to be elected stance? Or is she bullshitting him, and will she go her own way once elevated????
Interesting RC article, here (sub req):
Brownback Calls for Thoroughly Questioning Miers
Sen. Sam Brownback (R-Kan.) questioned Tuesday whether Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers has a “firm commitment” to what he called the framers’ “original intent” of the Constitution, saying that President Bush’s knowledge of her “heart” didn’t end the need for tough questioning.
A potential 2008 presidential candidate and member of the Judiciary Committee, Brownback on Tuesday served up the most detailed and most hesitant statement among Senate Republicans on Miers’ nomination, waiting more than a day to offer up his critique.
“President Bush has a long-standing working relationship with Ms. Miers and I trust the president knows her heart and her mind. Even so, the confirmation process has just begun and questions about her views on the Constitution need to be answered,” Brownback said in a prepared statement, echoing Bush’s remarks Tuesday morning in a Rose Garden press conference.
Her nomination goes directly against the wishes of Brownback and many other social conservatives, who had said after the hearings for then-chief justice nominee John Roberts that they wanted the next Supreme Court nominee to be someone with a detailed track record on conservative issues, particularly opposition to the Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion nationally. ...
http://www.rollcall.com/issues/cgi-bin/udt/im.display.printable?client.id=rollcall_news&story.id=10745