Tweetie just said

[TallahasseeGrannie]

that he, personally, is considered "hard to define."

Thinks highly of himself, doesn't he?

[flakey_foont]

1. I dunno

the word "wanker" is pretty easy to define

[Ilsa]

8. Little does he know that 1,000's compare him to a cartoon character. n/t

[Sydnie]

2. "hard to define" when talking about Tweety means

"blows with the wind".

[deadparrot]

3. He's a corporate whore.

:)

'kay, what do I win?

[The Backlash Cometh]

12. Really, once you realize that he has no moral center, everything

else falls in place.

[Marr]

14. That's exactly what he is. He's not "hard to define" at all.

[xray s]

4. Like the brown chunk floating in the pool in 'Caddyshack'

Is it a turd, or a Baby Ruth?

[annabanana]

6. heeheehee

thanks for the laugh!

[louis-t]

18. DOODEEE-E-E-E-E-E!

Giggle.

[highplainsdem]

5. I always thought "media whore" defined him pretty well.

[maine_raptor]

7. Stupid, just plain ol'stupid

That's how I define him.

But politically, not so hard after all he did admit voting for Bush in 2000.

[AlCzervik]

9. Tweety really fancies himself riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma

doesn't he?

[maine_raptor]

11. You got it in the first four words

"Tweety really fancies himself"

[marbuc]

10. Check direction of the wind, and you will find Chris Matthews

He is a wannabe media pied piper, a person that will find a parade (or perhaps angry mob is a better metaphor) and jump out in front, and claim to be its leader.

[Nite Owl]

13. Than we know him better than he knows

himself. Maybe he needs some counceling to get to know himself better.

[democrank]

15. I`ve never understood Matthews` popularity.

He`s a bit too jingoistic for my taste.

[goodboy]

16. Well, let me try: Tweety is a Disingenuous Repuke boot-licker.

how's that?

[Postman]

17. Not hard at all....he's an IDIOT

n/t

[Phoebe Loosinhouse]

19. I find myself vacillating when I attempt to define Tweetie

somedays I think "uniformed". Another day I think "shill".
Sometimes I think "wanker". Then there's " self-aggrandizing pseudo-journalist" . So, I have to agree with him, he is hard to define, but not in the self-congratulatory way he means.