Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does * have the first idea of how our government works?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 03:54 PM
Original message
Does * have the first idea of how our government works?
He picks a SCOTUS nominee whom he is "personally comfortable" with. Has he never heard of separation of powers? Doesn't he know that if confirmed he should NEVER speak to the Justice again. Who gives a rats ass if he can get along with the nominee. Does he have the slightest idea of what's in our Constitution?
What a moron!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. More to the point, he doesn't care how it works as long as he gets his way
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tompayne1 Donating Member (346 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't think he has read it
I had a quote somewhere. Dang.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Absolutely! He is a genius. Money, corruption, and lies is how
the Bushies see things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. NO. He's a Dictatortot
and it's working well for him so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. LOL!
"Dictatortot."
I am so stealing that! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I stole it from a C-SPAN caller a few years ago.
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's not stupidity, it's arrogance
The "system" is working for him, he is working the system. It doesn't matter if he ever speaks to Meirs again, what matters is if his lawyers ever have to appear before the Supreme Court, he has a friend.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. He comes by it (dis)honestly!
It is a family tradition, the Bushes and the Walkers have been working the system for all it's worth for generations. They are the "Robber Barons" of yore, literally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. As long as he's the dictator, he's comfortable with his dictatorship
And oddly enough, every Republican in the Senate is comfortable with it, too. A dismaying number of Democrats, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
93ncsu Donating Member (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. I didn;t realize the US Constitution ...
forbade a sitting US President from speaking to a sitting Justice of the Supreme Court. Is that really in there somewhere ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. No it doesn't.
But my point is that they will not be working together. SCOTUS is a separate branch of government, and only interacts with the executive at an official level.
He seemed to Pick Meirs the same way he picked Cheney. He felt comfortable with her. As if that matters.
He does not seem to grasp the workings of our government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. No, but a sitting justice is expected to recuse themselves
in any case in which they may have a personal involvement. Seeing as the President it the supreme executive, and very involved in how laws are made and executed, we would expect a justice who has daily and very familiar contact with the President to recuse themselves on many more cases.

Not that it stopped Scalia in the Cheney case......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. Recently I saw him on TV say that he was going to observe
(during the RITA hurricane preperations) because he "needed to understand how the State and Federal Governments worked together." NOt sure if that is the exact quote but if it wasn't, it was something very close to that. Good thing he was Gov of Texas 1st eh? He ruined our State Government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. He really doesn't know, not that it matters
Remember, he's the guy who claimed that the EXECUTIVE Branch of the government is the LAW INTERPRETING branch (during the 2000 recount). He really doesn't know, nor is it necessary for him to know. He'll do what he wants regardless of : The law, protocol, tradition, common sense, good taste, common courtesy, common decency....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
12. This cronyism IS the key to his success. It's been around forever,
and it's only now being noticed? What do you think Scalia meant when he was shocked, SHOCKED that anyone would question his hunting trips with Cheney when Cheney's case was going to be presented to the court? Scalia has never had that kind of scrutiny and doesn't realize that cronyism is wrong because THAT's how he got to the Supreme Court in the first place.

And what about Robert Novak crying because the Democrats are "criminalizing politics?" He's upset because the DEMOCRATS ARE GOING TO TAKE AWAY HIS EDGE.

They sit there and condescend to everyone else, when the truth is that they compromised themselves in order to be winners in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. Does that mean that the prez should never speak to
any of the senators or representatives, and the congressfolk should never speak to anybody on the SCOTUS?

And what about the VP? He's both chair of the senate and in the executive branch. I guess he can't even speak to himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firefox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. Not a moron, but a puppet
Remember how after the first * selection, the media attacked anyone who called * the puppet that he is got blasted. The greatest truth about * is that he is a puppet. He does not have to think. He does not have to write speeches. He is told what to think and what words to say.

I am surprised with all the punditry out there that we do not hear more of the solicitation of * by the Neocons and the education of * after he agreed to run for office.

I think the greatest truth out there on * is that he is a puppet and the best educational fruition will come when WeThePeople tell the story on his selection.

I regret not having a link on how he was approached and how he was indoctrinated, but the media are not going to say it and the pundits are all missing the main pressure point.

The case for * as a fascist is not being made either, and that is part of the reason the tide has not begun to go out on the band of criminals that are in our public offices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. Um, no. Thought we covered that a while back.
:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC