Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Miller should still be in jail....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 04:16 PM
Original message
Miller should still be in jail....
Edited on Fri Sep-30-05 04:16 PM by Postman
and a bunch of other crooks in this administration should join her.

She's no high minded journalist who held out against government corruption. She is/was part and parcel to the lies and corruption that led to the disaster in Iraq.

I say let her rot her skank ass off in solitary...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
oldtime dfl_er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. you got that right
She's still protecting someone - Bolton or Cheney or both. There's no high minded motive behind her jailtime.

http://www.cafepress.com/scarebaby/658010
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, WE know that.......
but the average citizen knows nothing of that and the rest of the "Liberal Media" is having a shit-fit that she was ever locked up in the first place. Anyone who knows anything about Judith Miller knows she's a bush whore and doesn't deserve the attention she's getting. I want to puke everytime Lou Dobbs complains that she's still in jail. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knowbody0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. one year for every bomb dropped
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. I agree she should still be in jail for aiding & abetting Bush & Co. but
she was there for protecting a source. And, as slimy as that source has turned out to be, isn't that an important thing to stand up for? Because if the law were to state that she had to give up her source, wouldn't that also apply to any source, including whistle-blowers? I'm just saying that there's probably 100's of things she should go to jail for and I'm no Miller fan - but on this one particular issue I see her point. Yes, Libby broke the law and he should absolutely be punished, but how do we do that without endangering other sources who are actually trying to do good and aren't braking laws? This is more of an honest question than an argument to your statement. If there's a way to go after the Libbys of the world but protect the Deep Throats, I'm all for it!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Sep 01st 2014, 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC