|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
|
| txaslftist
|
Wed Sep-28-05 02:52 PM Original message |
| Tom Delay may already have a plea deal... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
| RevolutionStartsNow
|
Wed Sep-28-05 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. As good as he would look in an orange jumpsuit... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ret5hd
|
Wed Sep-28-05 02:59 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 13. i want to see him in that cute prison ensemble i've seen on tv... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| VaYallaDawg
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:35 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 39. With the cigarette holder!! n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Chemical Bill
|
Thu Sep-29-05 09:20 AM Response to Reply #1 |
| 62. We had a mayor here in Providence, named Buddy, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DelawareValleyDem
|
Thu Sep-29-05 10:12 AM Response to Reply #62 |
| 66. Ah yes, Vinny Cianci |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DoYouEverWonder
|
Wed Sep-28-05 02:54 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. Delay is slime |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Oreo
|
Wed Sep-28-05 02:54 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. Maybe that's why there was only 1 count? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| aint_no_life_nowhere
|
Wed Sep-28-05 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
| 4. Delay actually hired legal counsel? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| txaslftist
|
Wed Sep-28-05 02:58 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 9. He's got more attorneys than a shithouse has flies. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Richard Steele
|
Wed Sep-28-05 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
| 5. That caught my eye as well. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Seansky
|
Wed Sep-28-05 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
| 6. Oh man! well, if that is the case, then he could still be an active GOP |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| txaslftist
|
Wed Sep-28-05 02:58 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 11. Well, a taphammer, not a sledgehammer. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Seansky
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:11 PM Response to Reply #11 |
| 20. ha, ha! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mark11727
|
Thu Sep-29-05 10:16 AM Original message |
| Behold, the new improved 2006 "HAMMER"! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Inland
|
Wed Sep-28-05 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
| 7. Wouldn't you also waive in order to have negotiations |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| txaslftist
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:00 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 14. Most prosecutors could give a shit what you say to the press. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Inland
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:04 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 15. Yaeh, but how can delay back down and take a plea |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| txaslftist
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:15 PM Response to Reply #15 |
| 24. "for the good of the country" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bahrbearian
|
Wed Sep-28-05 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
| 8. Resign so he can take over Abramoff old job? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| rateyes
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:50 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 44. You know, he's still got that |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| buff2
|
Wed Sep-28-05 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 10. Now that sucks. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| H2O Man
|
Wed Sep-28-05 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
| 12. Very good point. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| txaslftist
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:04 PM Response to Reply #12 |
| 16. Actually going down lower than it is already WOULD surprise me. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Lone_Star_Dem
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:10 PM Response to Reply #16 |
| 19. This would make sense |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| txaslftist
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:34 PM Response to Reply #19 |
| 38. Usually little evidence is shared... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| H2O Man
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:27 PM Response to Reply #16 |
| 32. Deals are where |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Catherine Vincent
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
| 17. Here is what Delay used.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| aint_no_life_nowhere
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
| 18. When will Delay be arraigned and will the media be allowed |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| txaslftist
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:12 PM Response to Reply #18 |
| 21. At his arraignment he will plead not guilty. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| aint_no_life_nowhere
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:14 PM Response to Reply #21 |
| 23. So I assume he will be taken into custody and bail will be posted? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| txaslftist
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:17 PM Response to Reply #23 |
| 25. He will voluntarily submit to fingerprinting and photos... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| aint_no_life_nowhere
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:20 PM Response to Reply #25 |
| 27. I hope someone leaks his mugshot to the press |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| A Simple Game
|
Thu Sep-29-05 11:09 AM Response to Reply #27 |
| 70. A deck of playing cards would be nice. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| wakemeupwhenitsover
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:46 PM Response to Reply #25 |
| 43. Why won't we get to see hammerhead's |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| rateyes
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:54 PM Response to Reply #21 |
| 45. Don't you think that there will be |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| txaslftist
|
Wed Sep-28-05 04:31 PM Response to Reply #45 |
| 56. Probably the Def. will file a motion to quash... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| GOPAgainstGW
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
| 22. List of Corporations Involved in DeLay TRMPAC Indictments |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| SlowDownFast
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
| 26. Kicked and nominated! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| berni_mccoy
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
| 28. Could it be possible that he waived this a while ago |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| txaslftist
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:23 PM Response to Reply #28 |
| 29. No way of knowing when he waived it... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| nadinbrzezinski
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
| 30. And that would not surprise me at all |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| txaslftist
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:30 PM Response to Reply #30 |
| 33. I wonder what Nancy Grace will make out of this... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| H2O Man
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:32 PM Response to Reply #33 |
| 35. She's a democrat. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| txaslftist
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:37 PM Response to Reply #35 |
| 41. Seriously? Egads. She's such a shrew. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| H2O Man
|
Wed Sep-28-05 04:29 PM Response to Reply #41 |
| 53. Yep. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| wakemeupwhenitsover
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
| 31. I just caught the tail end, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| txaslftist
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:32 PM Response to Reply #31 |
| 34. I don't have any evidence to back that up. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| wakemeupwhenitsover
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:39 PM Response to Reply #34 |
| 42. dang, I knew it was too good to be true:( n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| underpants
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
| 36. Very good-voted onto Ggreatest page |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Skidmore
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
| 37. Or a judge bought and paid for. May explain the cocky smile today. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| txaslftist
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:36 PM Response to Reply #37 |
| 40. A bought and paid for judge is unlikely in Austin. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| never_get_over_it
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
| 46. Do you think he would cut a deal with the prosecutor |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| txaslftist
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:59 PM Response to Reply #46 |
| 47. Sure. Ronnie's got a thick skin and Delay knows it. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| aint_no_life_nowhere
|
Wed Sep-28-05 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
| 48. U.S House Ethics Rules No. 23, section 10 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| txaslftist
|
Wed Sep-28-05 04:11 PM Response to Reply #48 |
| 49. The max for a State Jail felony is two years. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| aint_no_life_nowhere
|
Wed Sep-28-05 04:15 PM Response to Reply #49 |
| 50. Yeah, I just saw a video of Earle saying that on CNN |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| never cry wolf
|
Wed Sep-28-05 04:33 PM Response to Reply #50 |
| 57. I don't read it that way |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| aint_no_life_nowhere
|
Wed Sep-28-05 04:46 PM Response to Reply #57 |
| 59. I think we're reading it the same way |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| never cry wolf
|
Wed Sep-28-05 05:18 PM Response to Reply #59 |
| 60. Agreed, he could not represent the people |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Virginian
|
Wed Sep-28-05 04:29 PM Response to Reply #48 |
| 51. Can people convicted of a felony vote in Texas? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| txaslftist
|
Wed Sep-28-05 04:30 PM Response to Reply #51 |
| 54. Can't vote, but can get the right restored. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| aint_no_life_nowhere
|
Wed Sep-28-05 04:34 PM Response to Reply #54 |
| 58. I believe the House Rules say that Delay could get re-elected |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| The Backlash Cometh
|
Wed Sep-28-05 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
| 52. That's exactly the weakness in the Florida Ethics Commission. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| caligirl
|
Wed Sep-28-05 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
| 55. Fits with the theme of comments by Houston Chronicle Cragg Hines |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Walt Starr
|
Wed Sep-28-05 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
| 61. I fully expect a nolo contendere plea |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| fishnfla
|
Thu Sep-29-05 10:01 AM Response to Original message |
| 63. ... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Zen Democrat
|
Thu Sep-29-05 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
| 64. I don't think this necessarily means no "time" .. just state jail time |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| RebelOne
|
Thu Sep-29-05 10:10 AM Response to Original message |
| 65. I am pretty sure Delay won't be seeing the inside of a jail cell. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Walt Starr
|
Thu Sep-29-05 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
| 67. DeLay met with Earle on August 17 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Norquist Nemesis
|
Thu Sep-29-05 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
| 68. So, bargains and deals and such show more clearly he's a liar |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| chaz4jazz
|
Thu Sep-29-05 10:49 AM Response to Original message |
| 69. His attorney said - |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bob-calhoun
|
Thu Sep-29-05 12:39 PM Response to Reply #69 |
| 72. Saving his ass |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jim Lane
|
Thu Sep-29-05 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
| 71. An alternative speculation |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| zonkra
|
Thu Sep-29-05 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
| 73. Isn't it interesting |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Mr_Spock
|
Thu Sep-29-05 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
| 74. Resign would be good enough for me |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 24th 2013, 09:39 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC