Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

capitalism : socialism : economics :: gravity : mechanics : physics

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
expatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 02:41 AM
Original message
capitalism : socialism : economics :: gravity : mechanics : physics
Someday I am going to write a book. Discuss.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. In science - you come up with an idea, test it, and if it works better
than all the others - you keep it.

In politics - you put into place only the ideas that garner you more votes and give some elite what they want.

Fact is that nationalized (socialized) health care works well. The same as socialized pharmaceutical intellectual property rights. U.S. has one but not the other - because the elites have control over the representatives.

Make for a bad world.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
expatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. the analogy is like this....
lower case c capitalism is of course an unavoidable human act... the first capitalist act was when the first humanoid picked up a rock and used it to peel the bark off of a tasty root. S/he was exploiting the rock, was using the tool as capital. Even in hunter and gatherer societies, they try and gather a surplus when they can... there is a power structure... Che became disillusioned with the Soviets very soon when he realized that Cuba had just switched from being the sugar colony of the West to the sugar colony of the Soviet bloc.

Lower case c capitalism is unavoidable like gravity. it is all pervasive in all human societal-economic action. but we shall not lie down against gravity, we push against it and stand up.


lower s socialism is as old as society, it is collective effort. the first socialist act was when a father and his sons went out to take down a mastodon together... the first class struggle occurred when one brother said to another, "Why shall we let Father control who shall eat what portion of the meat and when? For he is old and it is we who killed the beast."

Lower case s socialism is democratic pressures and it is in this world in which socialism arises of and from a system permeated by the omnipresence of capitalism that it rises to counter-capitalism, like simple mechanics rises up as a system of and from a world dominated by gravity to counter it. when i speak of mechanics, it is in the simple abstract sense, like for the purposes of this analogy the roman wedge arch would be a perfect example of mechanics, gravity being harnessed to provide counterpressure against gravity.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Write books that pack a bigger punch than EJ Routh's
100+ year old ones on mechanics and I will buy them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 03:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. Maybe someday you can write it, legallly...
Edited on Sun Sep-25-05 04:00 AM by slor
on paper made fron HEMP. Support H.R. 3037!
<http://capwiz.com/norml2/issues/bills/?bill=7766161>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 03:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. Capitalism is the phenomena of aggregation of wealth,
and the fact that the more wealth one has aggregated, the easier it becomes to get more wealth (and power) still.

In and of itself there isn't anything wrong with aggregating wealth. It does matter however how much wealth is aggregated and what the consequences for others are.

If capitalism is insufficiently regulated then it is a winner-takes-all system which is favorable to a very few, and damaging to the many.

It is why Republicans want to deregulate and privatize everything. It is why the RW wants to deregulate and privatize everything. The more things are privatized and deregulated, the more these things can be exploited for private profit.

The opposite is to not want to privatize everything; it's typically what the Left/Democrats/Liberals/Labor Movement want;

- public funded education

- public funded health care

- public funded social security

- public funded media

- fair wages

- strong labor unions

- strong environmental protection
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC