Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Just my opinion, but the hell with Hillary Clinton

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 12:50 PM
Original message
Just my opinion, but the hell with Hillary Clinton
her response to Ms Sheehan was totally vapid, centrist, crap.

http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0539,fergusoncamp,68174,2.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
In Truth We Trust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ditto
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. "Ditto"? Here's What Clinton Actually Said AND What Sheehan Said
Edited on Fri Sep-23-05 01:07 PM by cryingshame
and, first of all, Clinton gets credit for meeting with her. Did BUSH?

"On Thursday, Sheehan sat down with Clinton and Reid, two of the highest-profile Democrats, to pose the same question she has posed to President Bush: “What noble cause are our loved ones fighting and dying for?"

“I asked them, ‘Are you going to be willing to lead us out of Iraq? Because if you do, the rest of the nation will follow you,’ ” Sheehan said.

Neither Clinton or Reid, who both voted for the war, were willing to reverse tracks and push for a U.S. withdrawal now. Nevertheless, Sheehan reported feeling “fabulous coming out of the meeting.”

“I know their offices are going to be working with us; all we have to do is keep up the pressure on them,” Sheehan said, adding, “Now it’s up to the people of New York to put pressure on Clinton.”


snip

Asked afterward about the meeting, Clinton noted that she had met earlier in the day with about 20 moms from American Gold Star Mothers, .... Clinton noted that those moms have voiced “different positions” on the war from the one held by Sheehan’s group, Gold Star Families for Peace.

But Clinton added: “My bottom line is that I don’t want their sons to die in vain.”

Asked when she thought those soldiers’ mission might be complete, Clinton responded: “I don’t believe it’s smart to set a date for withdrawal. I don’t think you should ever telegraph your intentions to the enemy so they can await you.”

“I’ve been very critical of the president’s policies and also supportive of the Iraqis who are trying to move forward and form a new government,” Clinton told the Voice.

“I think it is a much more complicated situation,” she continued. “I don’t think it’s the right time to withdraw, but we also have to stand up and send a message that we’re not going to be there indefinitely. We need to tell the Sunnis that they have to do their job and that we won’t be there forever. Because if you don’t, then what incentive is there for them to ever participate in the political process?”

Clinton cited two key upcoming moments: October 15, when the Iraqis are slated to vote on their new constitution, and December 15, when Iraqis are expected to elect a new government.

Responding to a question of whether Sheehan and the anti-war crowd are premature in demanding an immediate withdrawal of troops now, the presidential hopeful was nothing if not diplomatic.

“No, I think they’re playing a very important role,” Clinton said. “This is a democracy, thank God, and people should be speaking out. It helps keep the debate flowing and creates the conditions for better decision-making, which makes for better policies, so it’s very important.

“Nobody has a greater right to make that criticism,” Clinton said of Sheehan and the other military families who feel betrayed by the war. “But I happen to think that fighting for freedom is a noble cause. There are lots of things wrong with how Bush did it. I believe we should have gone through with the inspection process and acted through the UN. But I believe that standing up against someone as dangerous as Saddam was a good goal.”

Clinton was noncommittal when asked whether she still supports sending more troops to Iraq. “We’ll see,” she said, then disappeared into the Russell Senate office building.

At least Clinton was willing to hear Sheehan and the other military family members’ plea. Republican representative Bill Thomas of Bakersfield, California, wouldn’t let them in the door, while Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist’s staff told the group they would have to fill out a written form if they wanted a meeting. When told they had already called and e-mailed several times, Frist’s chief of staff relented and spent about 15 minutes with the group, which included Iraq war veterans and members of Military Families Speak Out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. Please don't bother pointing out facts to the Clinton bashers
They don't want to hear it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #23
41. Amen!
FYI - I just got an e-mail from Hillary Clinton's office ..... she is voting AGAINST Roberts.

But who really cares? Hillary is a neo-con fascist pig. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #41
56. Yeah, I hear Hillary is taking Rush's place on talk radio
Heven't you heard - she's jumped the shark :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #56
66. Chelsea's been bar hopping
with the Bush twins as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #66
76. I always thought Chelsea was kinda cute ;)
Edited on Fri Sep-23-05 02:58 PM by Mr_Spock
Do you know what bars their hangin' out at? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
In Truth We Trust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #23
47. Tha fact IS she has voted for this war and refuses to call an end to it!
enough said imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #47
55. Nobody "Voted For This War". The Resolution Gave POTUS POTENTIAL
to use force IF necessary the same way we give cops guns to use IF necessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #55
59. Still seems like they abdicated their responsibilty
to Bush.

Only Congress has the power to declare war. They stepped up to the plate, then handed Bush the bat and said "You do whatever you want."

Even if you accept that they were duped, then why do they continue to support the war? Do they actually think it can be won? If they do they are as big an idiot as Bush.

Did any of them actually BELIEVE that Bush didn't intend to invade no matter what was or wasn't found? If they did, they shouldn't be allowed loose from the home.

There are no good solutions to the situation in Iraq. Bush created a power vacuum with no one to fill it. Civil war is already taking place and their is ZERO chance of a peaceful solution at this point.

They did not have the moral integrity to oppose the war, so they will continue to support it no matter how many people are killed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #55
61. Translation: They voted for the war
Saying Bush could have the power to wage war on his own was the same as voting FOR the war.

It was patently obvious at that point that Bush was already determined to go to war, and was seeking the fig leaf of "authorization." He had no intention to avoid war, even if Sadaam had flown into Washington carryiong a white flag.

Anyone who didn't realize that was either not paying attention, or was so blinded by piolitical manuevering that they couldn't see the forest for the trees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #55
78. IMHO Hillary voted for the war, not just the resolution
She's had very little to say that wasn't in full support of the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #47
62. Amazing how you still remember the Republican talking points...
from last year's campaign. Color me impressed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
30. Excellent Post :-)
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
33. I didn't quite see the issue either when I read this
But then I understand the politics being played too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
38. Frist's chief of staff, but not Frist himself? I wonder if he was around.
That's lame.

Good post, though. I think Hillary is doing the best she can with a bad situation.

If she pushes to pull out early, and the system collapses, then her future opponents can say she was responsible for losing the war.

If she supports staying until the political process is complete, we blame her for continuing the pointless violence.

Personally, I think her career is less important, but if she thinks it's worth it to get someone like her into the office to change things, and that's a real possibility, I can see how she would be willing to make that choice.

However, she has to know that in the short term people will die because of her decision. She better win a diebold-proof victory and seriously change the way the U.S. addresses international affairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulfcoastliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #16
45. What about the freedom of Darfur/Sudan? Equatorial Guinea?
I guess this explains the lack of concern in Darfur:




Oops, I forgot Equatorial Guinea also has lots of oil so we overlook the total abuse of their population.

“But I happen to think that fighting for freedom is a noble cause.

Riiiight. And I have a bridge you may be interested in buying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
73. HILLARY: "...Fighting for freedom is a noble cause"
So Cindy's son died for a noble cause, after all. Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
27. You mean Bill?
Yeah, probably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. Realize I'm from Arkansas
and I've known about Hilary for a while, and I have not been impressed, not only with her stands on issues, but her simple unwillingness to listen to folks with ideas different from her own. Reading her replies to Cindy and her comments about the pro-Bush group sounded more like a GOP candidate than a Democrat, imho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. unwillingness to listen to folks with ideas different from her own
The time for that kind of politics is OVER as far as my voting choices are concerned. I've had enough of being ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. fellow Arkansan agrees
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. She listens...but
Hillary will meet with Sheehan and listen to her, but she is not HEARING her. The sound goes in, rattles the ear drums, but it never makes it to the brain!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tatertop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. I had hoped that all Democrats would stand by Cindy
The time is right, the message is right.
Alas, it is not to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
confludemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. They care more about a DLC Dems "chances" than ending a criminal war
I feel sorry for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tatertop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
68. It's to the point where I'M not sure what we stand for
I fear that kind of 'take no chances' thinking will not win elections.
They won't stand up for anything, then they wonder why
we are accused of ... not standing up for anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tatertop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
69. It's to the point where I'M not sure what we stand for
I fear that kind of 'take no chances' thinking will not win elections.
They won't stand up for anything, then they wonder why
we are accused of ... not standing up for anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hurray!....we haven't had a Lets Bash A Democrat thread in an hour!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Was kind of boring without one wasn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. No....I call it refreshing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
25. Tell me about it.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
42. Time to dust this off again ....


actually there wasn't any dust on it at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. I hope somewhere that guy's family is getting royalties for the use..
of that pic. I love it. Thanks for agreeing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #42
74. LMAO - SSDD!!!
Same shit, different day :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
confludemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
70. Guess a big-name pro-war Democrat is synonymous with "a Democrat", since
that's who's getting justifiably taken to task or "bashed". Nice euphemism usually used by Republicans when they are taking justifed criticism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #70
79. Why don't you not be like * , and actually LISTEN to what Cindy...
had to say:

“I know their offices are going to be working with us; all we have to do is keep up the pressure on them,” Sheehan said, adding, “Now it’s up to the people of New York to put pressure on Clinton.”

Show Cindy some respect, please! Act CONSTRUCTIVELY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
confludemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #79
85. Why don't you not be like Scott McClellan and think of other than pasting
the same phrase into every reply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #85
97. I figure if I paste it enough, some of you Cindy-disrespecters...
might actually "get it". I see its not working with you. Keep right on "bashing" Cindy's message. Have fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
confludemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #97
105. I like your stubborness
when, unlike now, you are on the right side of a question it should be beneficial to behind that wall of Scotty McClellan-like repetition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
75. Does that include Zell also? Or is he fair game?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #75
80. Psssst....Zell's no longer an elected Democratic official n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #80
84. So then Bill Clinton is fair Game?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #84
96. Feel free to bash any and all Dems you want to, if it makes you feel..
good. Lots of things make you feel good in the short term. Few of those things actually accomplish anything in the long term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. She even waffled on her reasons for the meeting
From the article above, Clinton felt she had to distance herself:

"Asked afterward about the meeting, Clinton noted that she had met earlier in the day with about 20 moms from American Gold Star Mothers, the pro-military group that President Bush has glommed onto in an effort to deflect the criticism by Sheehan and other military families. Bush has proclaimed this Sunday National Gold Star Mothers' Day to honor America’s fallen heroes—just a day after Sheehan and other military families are to speak out at Saturday’s anti-war demonstration.

Clinton noted that those moms have voiced “different positions” on the war from the one held by Sheehan’s group, Gold Star Families for Peace. "


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. Send Chelsea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
87. Is Chelsea for the war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tlsmith1963 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. Forget Her
She sold out to the DLC a long time ago. They are as useless as the neocons.

Tammy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
13. Did I accidentally stumble on freerepublic.com?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
28. If you go far enough to the left, you meet the right coming around back
It's a spectrum thing. That's why our side sometimes sounds like theirs. It's a lefty freeper thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frictionlessO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
35. I know it seems like everyone has to be in lock step with what ever the
Edited on Fri Sep-23-05 01:48 PM by frictionlessO
leaders say... I thought freeperville was the place for that.

No dissent aloud here according to so many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
44. I'm waiting for the "Hitlery's" to start flying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
confludemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
71. So anti-war outrage is "freerepublic"? got any other wise and wry quips?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BIG Sean Donating Member (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
14. Sorry...But Cindy has jumped the shark.
I respect her right to voice her opinion. But it sounds like she is starting to believe all of the hype.

I mean come on...are New Yorkers supposed to NOT vote for Hillary because Cindy said so?

Give it a rest already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
32. I can support her without agreeing with everything she says
She's not infallable.

I feel for her. I thought the Crawford protest was brilliant. But yeah, the words "jumped the shark" occured to me too.

But, as I've maintained all along, it's her message. We can not tweek it or frame it for her. It is what it is, and is presumably coming from her gut. And what she's done so far has been invaluable. But I think the impact she was going to have has already been felt, and folks at large probably aren't even paying all that much attention to her any more. Which might just be a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BIG Sean Donating Member (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #32
43. I agree completely...
I can fight for her right to speak...while still disagreeing what what she says.

America...Love it or FIX it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frictionlessO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #14
39. Yeah you Mother who lost her son in a war based on lies
that has completely disrupted any safety the uS mighthave had, and put not only our country in far greater danger but the rest of the world.

Yippee lets send more soldiers over so they can get fucked up in every which way and further endanger Iraqi lives as well as their own.

Johnny go quickly , eh?

Fairweather for you and as well as it should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #39
52. Bah. Bush already tried that tactic. We're immune to it now
We can disagree with her while still supporting her. I will not blindly follow her as if she were Mahatma Sheehan or something. She is not infallable.

Let her down off that pedastal. I doubt even she wants to be there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frictionlessO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #52
64. Oh sorry you are sooo right and I am wrong.
Sorry... I mean I dont want to not blindly follow the leaders of this cuntry or anything because they are certainly not fallable in the slightest.

Guess you are against the protests this weekend as well.

More soldiers more war more death and you can keep on keeping on because it will not end till we leave and we let Al Sadrs Mehdi Army and certain anti AQ insurgents have at AQ in Iraq.


Thats what you and Clark and Hill and all you supposed centrists have yet to learn. The people of Iraq roundly believe we are the greater threat and not AQ in Iraq. Until we leave AQ in Iraq will continue nearly unmolested by the local populace. Because we are the greater evil.

There is a major difference between the insurgents and AQ in Iraq. AQ in Iraq will continue to have support while we are there and will continue to slaughter anyone associating with us.

BTW if you want to start accusing me of being a motherfucking bushite by saying I use his tactics, I'd suggest you look at where staying the course came from... which is what Hill and Clark are saying (and then some "more troops we could beat them if we had more troops!", that might have workd 2 years ago). Hypocrisy?

I think I'll follow my conscience instead of leaders looking to save face where there is none to save.

Cindy is not on anymore of pedestal than Clark and Hilll but of course they do want to be there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #64
67. No, you're not a Bushite.
But saying that folks are being disloyal to Cindy Sheehan and are fairweather friends because they happen to disagree with her in some instances smacks terribly of "you're either with us or with the terrorists." It's just a bit too much like high school somehow. Yea team! (mleck.)

It's too close to the same frame of mind, albeit from the opposite end of the spectrum.

As for the rest, you make assumptions about me based on near nothing. I defend fairness, not necessarily Hillary Clinton, who along with Biden, are at the very, very bottom of my list of potential candidates for 2008. However, I give her credit when credit is due. I try not to be kneejerk in my reactions. She votes against Roberts, she gets a cookie. She does Cindy the courtesy of a meeting, she gets another cookie.

I still tend to consider her a pander monkey, however.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frictionlessO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #67
82. That is not at all what your topic line inferred.
What was I trying to infect you with so that you'd be immune. What do you mean by Bush has already tried that? You made an assumption on me as well with that line.

The post I responded to said this

"Sorry...But Cindy has jumped the shark.

I respect her right to voice her opinion. But it sounds like she is starting to believe all of the hype.

I mean come on...are New Yorkers supposed to NOT vote for Hillary because Cindy said so?

Give it a rest already."

I respect the right to criticize, though this poster has obviously had it sooo much with Cindy that the only thing worth defending her over is her right to voice an opinion. Which puts her right up there with Neo Nazis and religious extremists.

FWIW I do intend on voting for HIll though she has been a lack luster Senator.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
19. I voted for all Dems but that doesnt mean I cannot criticize them
Hell, I held my nose when I voted for Kerry..anyone who signed up for this war is suspect IMO..I guess Im a John Conyers Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
20. What really frosts my cake
is that after this meeting, Hannity, O'lielly, Limpballs, Savage and all the other RW propagandist will be saying: "See? Not even Mainstream Democrats support Cindy Sheehan. She's (Cindy is) a nutcase!"

Hillary just handed them more ammunition.

Bye-bye Hillary.....forget the nomination. forget support from the Democratic base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. Well, mainstream Dems don't necessarily support Cindy
I think that the mainstream position is that we need to get out of Iraq as soon as possible but under conditions that make sense. Maybe after the Constitution is voted in is the time. I mean, there needs to be a moment where we say, "Okay, it's up to the Iraqis to sink or swim now." But I don't know if pulling out in a way that looks like retreat is the method to do it. Clearly, both Clintons feel the same way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
confludemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #26
81. When is ending an illegal war deemed to have a time that "make sense"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
24. Clinton bashing post # 24341324232342. Welcome to DU,
Clinton bashing central.

As if we don't have enough problems with are real enemies, we are eating or own - and for no good reason either. Sometimes I just despise this place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. criticism is bashing?
I think criticism is healthy. The with us or against us mentality should only belong to the bushbots. Healthy critiques are essential.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. "the Hell with Hillary" "the Hell with Hillary" "the Hell with Hillary" "t
that's a bit more than criticism. You just called for Hillary Clinton to be damned to hell for having a consistent position on an issue that you have already complained about in the past. It's not fair criticism because you already knew her position on the issue. And saying "the hell with so-in-so" isn't exactly a "criticism" opening salvo. It is bashing in my book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #34
49. Folks really don't get that distinction most of the time
I run into similar things with Kerry. Criticism I will rebutt. Bashing I will counteract with what I know of the truth, and will likely be called an apologist for my trouble.

As for Hillary, I'm not her biggest fan, but I must give her credit for meeting with Cindy. If Cindy is happy with the meeting that insued, then that's a good thing. That and her impending vote against Roberts... two kudoes from me in two days. She's on a roll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #34
53. No SHIT!
I swear to god, Hillary Clinton could discover a cure for cancer and people would still bash her.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
confludemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #34
77. Interesting: Hil refused to reconfirm her belief in sending more troops.
Very significant, that has been her consistent position along with Kerry--if she thinks we don't need more, what does that mean? It's so bad there we truly either need many more troops or we need to get out. And given the illegality of the war and the impeachable lies that got us there and the deadly provocative effects of our military presence, if you are a Democrat with principles then you want us out. So whaddya say Hillary? Hre reply: "Let's see."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #77
86. She's enjoying watching the Iraq war hang Bush out to dry maybe
...that, and the fact that it's a lose, lose, lose situation at this point. Bush bought the farm on this one and I don't think he's getting a free ticket out any time soon.

Definition of lose, lose lose FYI:

1. We lose if we "stay the course" - this shit ain't working.

2. We lose if we put more troops there as the army is extremely strained AND it will hurt recruiting AND we have found that we need National Guard at home.

3. We lose if we pull out suddenly or on an announced date. This is the most controversial, but we will likely lose all we have invested in Iraq, Iraq will likely break out into civil war and many more will die - and it will be our fault, the USA really does look like losers and will lose even more respect if we hightail it out of there.

Personally I would still choose option 3 but without giving any indication that's what we're doing - I actually think that's what's happening believe it or not. I disagree with Hillary's public stance though she may know that we are doing three also and is protecting the country's image - I have no way of knowing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
confludemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #86
92. If she's enjoying that then she's worse than I thought
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #92
95. So your going to miss my point and all I typed just to poke my words??
You do understand that it was an expression I was using and it doesn't literally mean that she is "enjoying" the people dying.

No, I didn't think so.

:eyes:

I give up - mine as well talk to a wall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
confludemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #95
104. I apologize, no intent to mock your words just my conclusion from what you
said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #104
107. You couldn't have read my post.
I said in it that I disagreed with Hilary's position.

I also listed why there is no way to win in this Iraq situation we are in.

You chose to ad hominem attack Hillary instead of giving a reason why you dosagree with her position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
confludemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #107
110. I disagree with her pro-war stance and issue an ad-hominem attack on her
We must withdraw. The war is patently illegal, destructive to all parties and doesn't make us safer, and the chaos is exacerbated by our presence. My conclusion is that the Iraqis ahould decide their own future. When and if they arrive at true sovereignty we can help them reparations wise if they ask. Elsewhere here I have fleshed out my disagreement. Given your cranky replies both times I reread in the interest of comity your post, and the subject line and the message don't lead me to reach any other conclusion than the initial one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. "The hell with Hillary"...."crap".....
very sophisticated and insightful criticism. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #37
54. Every dead soldier in Iraq is dead because some Dems
went along with this war..until they admit they were wrong, made a mistake, and were fools to sign on to this war, and stop waffling, then I say to hell with them. I stand by my statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #54
58. Again, listen to Cindy....don't be like Bush. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leetrisck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #54
101. And I can just as easily say too hell with Cindy
in the name of my dead relatives in the war, veterans, etc. - She's going where she can get the most attention. She had bush on the run (she really did) but she was losing face time so she goes wandering off into the wilderness. Hillary meets with her (bush didn't) and then everyone bashes Hillary. Hillary could have just lied to her. "Oh honey, I'm so sorry for your loss" (like bush). Thing is, we are sorry for Cindy's loss and she was doing well. No more - shut up Cindy and go to hell home or wherever but stay out of my face - thank you. I'll stand up for my own dead relatives in my own way but you will never know it - I may be in DC, NY AR, MO WI or anywhere else doing something to stop this war but I sure as hell won't be calling on the Cindy's, the bushes or the Clinton's and then turn around and bash them. I'll do it on my own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RethugAssKicker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
29. Shes way too moderate.
She's just another F*** politician. Trying to play the middle road, trying not to offend anyone with her NO-OPINION comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
36. Clinton's Bottom Line: "I don’t want their sons to die in vain."
But Clinton added: “My bottom line is that I don’t want their sons to die in vain.”

Why is it so hard for people to accept, even those who were lied to in order to get thier support that the soldiers have ALREADY DIED IN VAIN? THEY DIED FOR BUSH'S VANITY!

WAKE UP SHEEPLE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
40. Thank goodness Cindy doesn't agree with your sentiments...
From the article:

“I know their offices are going to be working with us; all we have to do is keep up the pressure on them,” Sheehan said, adding, “Now it’s up to the people of New York to put pressure on Clinton.”

So, Cindy obviously doesn't agree with your "The hell with Hillary!". Why are you knocking Cindy's point of view????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #40
48. Cindy is more of an optimist then I am
every Dem who voted for this war is suspect, and their continued unwavering support to keep our kids in harms way is suspect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. Maybe you should actually listen to her for a change....
or are you like *, caught up in your own worldview and unwilling to listen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #51
57. Every day that a Dem doesnt speak out to get our soldiers home
is a day another one dies. Im sorry if you think we have all the time in the world to wait for some of our Dems to step up to the plate, but we dont. Every day they waffle, another soldier dies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #57
60. Then go ahead and say "the hell with Cindy". The disrespect ...
you are showing Cindy says that loudly.

She wants you to work constructively, and you want to get on the internet and say "The Hell with Hillary!" and what she says is "crap"! I guess its a lot easier to do that though than expend some effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MamaBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
50. One Good Corporate Donation
One Good Corporate Donation is worth more than any mere lives to the DLC crowd. It's all money, money, money to them. Had not the Repubs gone so insanely Right, then Kerry, Clinton, Edwards, Lieberman, Biden and the whole crowd would be Republican with their banker friends.

And Karl Rove would still have the polaroids on all of them, and they'd all do his will.

Too many people only want to be thought of as winners and care little about what is actually accomplished. I count the DLC, and their supporters, among that crowd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #50
100. Corporations are prohibited by law from donating money to federal
campaigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
63.  “My bottom line is that I don’t want their sons to die in vain.”
But they did die in vain - and NOTHING will change that. EVER. They died for NOTHING (unless you count defense and oil contractor profits - and if you do, FUCK YOU for even existing)

Illegal war.Illegal occupation. Built on lies. Washed in blood. And the cover-up of lies continues.

All in vain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
confludemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #63
90. Shows how truly bankrupt Hillary is. Justifiably: to hell with you,Hillary
Parotting republican talking mantra as someone else is repeating a same mantra--unohoo you are--that since these people died for a lie, more should do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #90
99. I'm just beyond sick of anyone trying to turn the Iraq mess into
Edited on Fri Sep-23-05 03:36 PM by Solly Mack
anything good.

How can it ever be good? It was built on lies for profit. Whatever future end they look into their crystal balls and see in no way justifies the means....or the costs.

besides which, I don't see a good end to it - or the war in Afghanistan.

Just another imperialistic grab that will kill people in the future , just like it's doing now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frictionlessO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
65. Shhhh don't say anything bad about Hill or Clark or any other war
supporters... I mean staying the course is the only option they can think of and you dont want to disturb their fragile ego driven existance.

Please stay in lock stop and make sure that all your critiques are aimed at Cindy jumping hammerheads and treating her like the only good thing about this situation she finds herself in is the right to her free speech.

Thank you now please donate to Hills campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rniel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
72. Elect her and she'll just send more troops in there
Continue the madness. She's not liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
83. I share your opinion nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
88. To those defending Hillary Clinton in this thread:
Do you agree with her position on the war? Seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #88
109. I defended her- but my answer is "no."
Point taken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fescue4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
89. Hillary is just playing it smart and down the middle
She wants to be president of course.

Once shes elected, then the gloves come off.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yankeedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #89
98. What if they don't?
She has given ZERO indication that she wants to stop the slaughter. It's not a chance we can take. Let's nominate someone in '08 who is against the slaughter of soldiers and Iraqis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fescue4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #98
102. Then we are still better off
While its going to be tough to get a worse president, and surely ANYONE will better, Hillary is proably our best electable hope for the nation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yankeedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #102
106. She's better than a puke , but
Don't you think that we should take a shot at an electable Dem who doesn't believe in the slaughter of soldiers? There is lots of time to find one.

Hillary feeds into the public impression that Dems don't stand for anything- she says "Vote for me, even though I agree with the Republicans".

We need two things from the '08 Presidential candidate

- A fighter against the smear machine: Hillary will do that.
- Someone with somewhat progressive values: Hillary will have to prove herself.

And if possible, no more Senators. And PLEAASE no John "I promised to fight for every vote, before I conceeded" Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
91. I support NO ONE that is pro-war
Did any of you hear Hillary's IWR speech? The 1st 7/8's of her speech listed the reasons we should not invade Iraq. And those reasons were factual.

YET, in that last 1/8th of her speech, she stated she was going to for FOR it.

Hillary is for Hillary. She is not for We, the People. She is not for saving the lives of those sent to an immoral, pre-emptive war based entirely on lies.

I agree w/Mari333. The hell w/Hillary!

P.S. I am not bashing a fellow Dem, as I am an Independent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fescue4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
93. At least she met with Cindy
Bush refused to ever even meet her.

While she publicly disagrees, only Hillary has had the balls to meet Cindy Sheehan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #93
108. Good point- and she voted down Roberts too.
I'm not a huge fan of hers- but she is a saint compared to any Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
94. An opinion I've held since she voted for the war.
To hell with her and all the others that aided and abetted the slaughter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
103. Hi Mari333...
...good to see you back, I haven't seen you around here in a long time. How are you, and how is your son doing? Is he back from Iraq for good?

I'm afraid I, too, agree with your statement on Hillary's position. Yes, it's good that she met with Cindy Sheehan; it's really, really bad that she continues to try and carve out a so-called "centrist" position.

There were literally millions of us, around the world, who saw through the Bush bullcrap during the runup to the Iraq invasion. So Hillary, et al, can try and claim that they were "deceived" by "bad intelligence", etc.; well tell you what, Ms. Clinton, there were a WHOLE HELL OF A LOT OF US WHO WERE NOT DECEIVED AT ALL. And now that we are proven correct on a daily basis by events that have spiraled out of control there, all you can come up with is, let's keep sending our young men and women into a hell hole of our own making.

Pffft.

On the other hand, let us heed Cindy's advice, and keep applying the pressure. It's the only thing we can do, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
111. Locking....
This thread has become inflammed and
it has run its course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC