Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How, exactly, is the recall question worded?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-03 02:16 AM
Original message
How, exactly, is the recall question worded?
If anyone has a copy handy, I'd like to see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-03 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. VOTE YES OR NO ON THE RECALL MEASURE BELOW
Shall GRAY DAVIS be recalled (removed) from
the office of Governor?

YES
NO

------------

The Candidates to succeed (replace) Gray Davis
if he is recalled (removed) are listed on this
page and the following 6 pages

VOTE FOR ONLY ONE CANDIDATE FOR GOVERNOR

(then the candidates are listed in kind of random order)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piperay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-03 03:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. and then the numbers for candidates go from 11 to 179
Bustamante is number 31 which is pretty good because he is the first of the major candidates still in the running, the groper is number 37, Camejo is 69 and McClintock is 162. Arianna Huffington had a good one..16, she was on the first page, Gary Coleman is 67 and Larry Flint is 111.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uhhuh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-03 03:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Hmm
On my copy of the ballot, Cruz is 2nd to last. I wonder if it's different in different parts of the state??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piperay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-03 04:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. How Strange..
I am in Los Angeles County. I thought they were all the same but apparently not, that's not good. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-03 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Why not good?
I thought the idea was to give different areas different orders, so there was less of a chance of ballot order influencing the vote. It sounds OK to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piperay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-03 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I meant it wasn't
good that Bustamante is at the bottom in some places, anything that makes it harder to find someone can hurt Democratic chances. Having them in different places on the ballot hopefully will help to stop the usual repuke cheating though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Oct 01st 2014, 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC