Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Just two words which should stop ANY senator from confirming Roberts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 11:59 AM
Original message
Just two words which should stop ANY senator from confirming Roberts
Michael Brown.

The appointment of Michael Brown to the post of FEMA head would never have happened had anyone actually vetted the man. His nomination was a clear indication, made even more clear after Katrina, that George Bush does NOT place nominations based upon qualifications. Roberts/BushCo is deliberately withholding PUBLIC RECORDS which would allow the senators to thoroughly examine his qualifications.

It is that simple. Bush is a proven Crony-promoter who cares not about the people, unless those people helped him on the way up. Period. That is no way to appoint ANYONE, let alone Chief Justice to the Supreme Court.

This isn't even about Roberts. It is about the process. Any senator who votes to confirm this man should be absolutely ashamed of himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
abluelady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. My thoughts, exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roachman Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hadn't thought of it that way.
You have a good point.

I just assumed the hidden and accidentally lost records just showed he was evil.

Now there are two possibilities!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocracyInaction Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thinking along the "same" but "different" line
I know that Bush absolutely loves to spit in the face of the American people. I know he utterly adores division. I know he wants not to just 'beat' Dems, he wants to punish them and erradicate them. So, why in the hell when the biggest kick in the face he can give this nation and the Dems presents itself in the form of appointing a SC justice and particulary the Chief one, would be decide to put on just a easy, middle of the road, mildly conservative one??? Roberts is ready to cleanse this country---ultra right wing way--mark my word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 15th 2024, 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC