Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

You can bet your asses that those levees would've been built higher

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:10 AM
Original message
You can bet your asses that those levees would've been built higher
years ago in New Orleans if....instead of so many poor black people living there in those low sections....it was rich white people. Rich white people in low-lying flood-prone areas would've had the means and the money to lobby Washington into building those walls as high as it would've taken to ford off the inevitable catastrophe that scientists have long been predicting.

The disaster in New Orleans is proof beyond proof that poor people, especially poor black people, simply have no say when it comes to their own well-being. And in this country, if you have no say, the higher-ups don't care about you. Poor people pose no threat to the rich, and since poor people can't afford to lobby Washington, the white-collar assholes in DC simply don't give a rat's ass about them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. Rich people get everything. Not a surprise.
Of *course* rich people would have gotten better levees.

Because those rich stay at home wives/husbands/kids would have been out raising a stink and having dinners and meeting with Senators about how horrible things are and why do they have to live like this.

Disgusting, as usual, but that's what happens when money is the most important thing in a society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. If the White House was in New Orleans
Those levees would be double walled, thirty feet high, and have charming parks all round them.

But they were too clever by half, dissing the city because of its poor population. Now they fucked over their energy supplies, and I feel a nip in the air today.

And it isn't just the cost of gas, the increased cost of trucking, and a rise in the price of foodstuffs and other goods resulting.

Will it be a cold winter, I wonder??? How many people will shiver in their homes come Christmastime?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. and on a more recent scale.
if it was a rw republican fundamentalist stronghold instead of a minority-heavy, liberal and, to their eyes, decadent, city. the levee mediation funds wouldnt have been cut over and over by bushco.
if the levees had been maintained on schedule this near miss would probably been only that instead of the disaster we now have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laureloak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. Hwy to nowhere instead of levee upgrade. Read this and weep.

New York Times
Sep 1, 6:06 PM (ET)
By RON FOURNIER

<snip>
Just last year, the Army Corps of Engineers sought $105 million for hurricane and flood programs in New Orleans. The White House slashed the request to about $40 million. Congress finally approved $42.2 million, less than half of the agency's request.

Yet the lawmakers and Bush agreed to a $286.4 billion pork-laden highway bill that included more than 6,000 pet projects for lawmakers. Congress spent money on dust control for Arkansas roads, a warehouse on the Erie Canal and a $231 million bridge to a small, uninhabited Alaskan island.

How could Washington spend $231 million on a bridge to nowhere - and not find $42 million for hurricane and flood projects in New Orleans? It's a matter of power and politics.
<snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. "less than half of the agency's request"
That is pathetic, giving only 40% of the necessary funds to ward off inevitable disaster. Oh, wait, it's a non-affluent area, so I guess it doesn't matter as much. How criminal.

Good find on that article, btw.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laureloak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. $231 million bridge to a small, uninhabited Alaskan island.
That's what really got me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I wonder if that "small, uninhabited Alaskan island"
is loaded with precious wildlife that's going to soon give way to oil rigs and pipelines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. you can bet your booty if they rebuilt it they won't let those poor blacks
back into the redesigned neighborhoods...sad but I fear very true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. That goes without saying. One of my biggest concerns is that,
by the time New Orleans is rebuilt, the poor black people who used to live there will have conveniently been shoved into some new "safer" locations hundreds of miles inland where they don't really want to be.

Meanwhile, the rich people will take over, the walls will be built to whatever height it takes to insure THEIR safety, and everyone will be celebrating at backyard barbecues of the new homes of oil barrens across the city.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
9. The means and the money were there. Bush underfunded it because
he thought it was much more important to give millionaires a much needed tax cut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC