Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ted Kennedy talking to the Senate - 2:29 p.m.- C-Span 2

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 01:08 PM
Original message
Ted Kennedy talking to the Senate - 2:29 p.m.- C-Span 2
Edited on Wed Oct-01-03 01:29 PM by LittleApple81
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The platitudes are an insult to our troops and an insult to our country!
Bremer when asked what was the plan: I will inform you but I want to keep my hands free as to how I do that.
This was a budget but no plan.
Nothing submitted so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Security situation in Iraq?
The Rand study: historically how those individuals that are subject of occupation view the occupiers: one powerful factor and force is the issue of security. No only in the streets and highways between communities but what happens in Baghdad every day and every night: feeling of insecurity. No plans to deal with this.

Training police who don't want to leave the barracks because they are afraid of what will happen to them or their families.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. saying they are making the Iraq plan up everyday
"people view occupiers as good or bad depending on security"

Rapes murders coming into hospitals, that is what people in Iraq will use to judge us. Iraqi troops who have been trained will not leave the barracks for fear of being killed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. overall strategy: top down not bottom up.
Stake-holders feedback mostly because the action of the armed forces who had experience in Kosovo and other places.
Number of questions:
1. Who gets the contracting? circumstances of contracts? transparency? no bid contracts to people that are usually overcharging the defense department? Excluding whom from contracts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. What's going on? Just turned it on, is it a speech to the Senate, or
a hearing of some sort?......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Senate discussing the 87B for Iraq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Okay I see now...someone posted another thread saying he was
ripping Bremer and I wondered if LPB was there...thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. Greatest threat to US is terrorism.
North Korea, Iran, violence in the middle east.
Troops deserve a plan that brings the international community for the future of Iraq.
The 87B cannot be a blind check.
Administration must be held accountable. How are we spending the money.
Administration must tell the country what it intends to do with the 87B.
Do they have a plausible plan for the future.
Soldiers' lives are a stake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. The administration mis-estimated the costs of the war.
People who are making these recommendations now are the same that made the mistakes before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. Independent estimate was judged to be close 300b before
and Rumsfeld said baloney.
Now Bremer when asked if he will come back for money, he said "don't count us out."
So, Ted says, WHERE IS THE PLAN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. At a minimum we need better justification.
Nixon: trust but verify.
Americans have a right to be furious when they realize the true costs.
NO PLAN FOR PEACE.
$50,000 dollars a bed in prison.
$530,000 to train ONE OFFICER.
1.4 B to reimburse nations helping nations who are helping us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I give up trying to keep up. See you later. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Half a million bucks to "train" each policeman. Yow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC