Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Federal Funds For Abstinence Group Withheld

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 09:18 AM
Original message
Federal Funds For Abstinence Group Withheld

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/22/AR2005082201230.html

Officials at the Department of Health and Human Services ordered the group to submit a "corrective action plan" if it hopes to receive an expected $75,000 grant this year.

In a letter to the program director, Harry Wilson, associate commissioner of the Family and Youth Services Bureau, concluded that the project funded with federal dollars "includes both secular and religious components that are not adequately safeguarded."

<snip>

"Any religious teaching that goes on is separate in time and place from what the government is funding," said Joel Oster, senior litigation counsel at the Alliance Defense Fund, which is representing the Silver Ring Thing. "They offer a religious program and they offer a secular program; kids can choose which one they want to go to."

In an advertisement on its Web site for a set of educational materials on DVD, Silver Ring Thing promises: "A secular program is also in development."


Shocked, I can't tell you how surprised I am that they would do this
(where the hell do I find that Sarcasm smiley?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Here you go:
Edited on Tue Aug-23-05 09:22 AM by TwilightZone
:sarcasm:

It's close to the bottom of the smilies lookup table. Or you can type it as : sarcasm : (without the spaces)

So, in other words, they lied. They claimed to have both programs, but the secular program is "in development."

How nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. "not adequately safeguarded"
nor funded, who'd a thunk it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. Ooooh, will that make the fundies howl?
George is not making anybody happy these days, is he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC