Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What the right apparently thinks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
LuckyTheDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 06:12 PM
Original message
What the right apparently thinks
Edited on Wed Aug-17-05 06:13 PM by LuckyTheDog
What the right believes, so far as I can tell, is this:

The "left" (which they define as "all others") knows the Iraq war is good for America and is going well. But the "left" opposes the war entirely based on a hatred for GW Bush. And apparently, we hate GW Bush because entirely because he is a Christian and we hate everyone who is not an atheist. Thus, all policy disagreements between the Bush worshipers and everyone else actually are based on the struggle between Christianity and atheism. And the goal of atheism, apparently, is the total destruction of America and the American way of life. Thus, they also believe that all "leftists" (again, defined as "everyone but us") are the enemy.

:banghead:

Do I have that about right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NorCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Close enough
you can lump brown-skinned people in there with the atheists as well, and then you're spot on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think so
I know I've been told that Bush is the Second Coming of Christ by freepers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gyre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. That's what they said about Dan Quayle.
The Morans! :rofl:

Gyre
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. sigh... I'm afraid so
At least for a cadre of particularly dunderheaded bushbots. You know, the "some of the people" people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kysrsoze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Dead on. Another important question: Why do they think the way they do?
Edited on Wed Aug-17-05 06:27 PM by kysrsoze
Because it allows them to mask (to others and themselves) their utter greed/selfishness and complete disregard for others by wrapping themselves in the Bible. Calling everyone else evil and godless helps them deny their true selves - just like their "leader," G.W.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's a clear symptom of a Personality Cult ....
... when all their rhetoric boils down to the "anti-Bush" or "Bush-basher" core statement. Everything hinges on that tenet of faith -- a worship thing. That's a Cult - no doubt about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. even though over 80% of u.s. is christian. that fuzzy math n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cats Against Frist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yeah, that just about sums it up
It's "divine order," versus "modernity." It's been going on for some time, now. I hope that for all that is sex and noodly that the Flying Spaghetti Monster makes modernity win out. And, that opinion would make me a post-modernist, which I am. When modernity wins, then we can finally start trashing modernity for real, and not worrying about what some have-been, boar leg-eating, mead-swilling goody hayseed classicists have to say.

Really, though, in all seriousness, I don't know what to call "the others." It's like they still believe in the philosophies of absolutism, religion and order -- but still, like the neocons, filtered through modernism. Does anyone know what one might call this? Neo-neo-classicists, or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC