Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What if the Plame leak instigator was not Rove, but Bush himself?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
markses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 06:00 PM
Original message
What if the Plame leak instigator was not Rove, but Bush himself?
Is it possible?

What would be the repercussions?

Would it ever come out?

Completely hypothetical conversation:

(After Amb. Wilson's July revelations)

Bush: Goddamnit, Karl? Who in hell is this asshole anyway? This is gonna hurt us!

Rove:The guy was the expert on Niger, Mr. President. It was a good choice at the time - for Dick and the Agency, anyway.

Bush: Any dirt on the fucker?

Rice (sitting by): Not really. Squeaky clean kinda guy. Cusses a bit, but his resume is just killer.

Bush: C'mon! Does he screw around? Nail little boys? What? Nobody's clean.

Rice: Uh, don't think so. Wife's in the Agency, so you know he's not *cheating*!

Rove: Har Har.

Bush : Yeah, she'd git the fucker with them spy gadgets.



But at this point an idea starts to take form, and Bush knows a few staffers in communications who idolize him. A suggestion here or there, you'd make the President very happy if....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cappurr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nah...
The has Rove written all over it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Agree
Chimpy is just the puppet manipulated by Rove, Wolfowitz, Cheney, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I'm more or less in agreement
Two things though:

1) Bush is vindictive, as we all know, and has a long memory for real or perceived slights. In this sense, I would not at all be surprised if he attempted to "fuck" somebody he felt had wronged him.

2) The Wilson revelations were the first real body-blow to the Bush Admin shield of invincibility. It was probably perceived as such at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Don't think he would be energetic enough to pick up the phone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booberdawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. This story indicates two sources in the White house leaked info
My hunch is Rove and Cheney are the ones who leaked the Plame info

A senior administration official cited in a Washington Post report Sunday said two top White House officials called at least a half-dozen journalists and revealed the identity and occupation of Wilson’s wife.


MSNBC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chomskyite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. The question is not what you think happened
. . . but what you can prove. I just don't see this thing gathering much momentum beyond this weekend. No taping system could have caught Rove giving the order.

The staffers will not own up to who told them to do the leaking. They were probably chosen based on their blind loyalty. Anyone who would DO this to begin with would have zero trouble lying to a court or to a prosecutor about whether or not they did it.

And who is going to subpoena the phone records that would prove who did the calling to which journalists when? The Ashcroft Justice Dept? The Mueller FBI? The Republican Senate or House?

No. This story has gained all the momentum it can. It's up to the candidates to keep mentioning it and to do so in such a way that Bush can't survive it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Problems there
1) The reports are that (at least) 6 different journalists were CALLED. The White House keeps phone logs. Locating the staffers that made these calls will be fairly easy for the DOJ or an independent prosecutor, if the CIA hasn't already turned over their names with the request to investigate.

2) Whoever the staffers or officials are, they either had clearance themselves, or they didn't have clearance. If they did have clearance, they are in clear violation of the oath that goes with that clearance and the law. if they did not have clearance, they must have received that information from somebody else who does have clearance. they will be leaned on to say who gave them the information. This matter of leaking classified information - even internally - is no small matter, and won't be met with complacence.

So, in short, I think you're wrong about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diplomats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. The Dems are already saying they don't trust the DOJ
to investigate (no shit!) and are calling for a special prosecutor. They have to keep this up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FauxNewsBlues Donating Member (420 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. The CIA knows alot too
Question for any journalists here.

Bob Novak called up the CIA to ask if they had a problem with him revealing an agents name. They said yes, but he said they weren't forceful enough.

Is it not likely that the other 5 journalists called the CIA too, but were better convinced not to do so?

Therefore the CIA knows all 6 reporters names. Is the CIA under any obligation to not leak those names out? This makes me feel stronger that this was a Tenet leak. Tenet would be aware of the 6 reporters. People in the White House would maybe know the plan, but not all the details. The 6 reporters would have called the CIA, that is how the CIA knows about the other 5 other than Novak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. The similarities to the Nixon tapes is uncanny!
June 15, 1971: Nixon and Kissinger, 10:39 A.M., Oval Office
Conversation #520-4

Kissinger: The reason you have to be so tough, also, Mr. President, is because if this thing flies on the New York Times, they're gonna do the same to you next year. They're just gonna move file cabinets out during the campaign. I mean, these guys, uh -

Nixon: Yeah. They'll have the whole story of the Menu Series.



June 15, 1971: Nixon and Kissinger, 12:45-12:54 P.M., Oval Office
Conversation #520-8; cassette #757

Kissinger: It'd make me look good, so I have no personal, uh. . . . And it will even help this administration a little because it shows that I was committed to negotiations before. But - we just don't have records like this in the bureaucracy.

Nixon: That's why the bureaucracy is furious.

Kissinger: But they can't leak on us like this. . . .

Nixon: Really, why should I ever say anything to the Secretary of State or the Secretary of Defense after this sort of incident. I'll be Goddamned if I'm ever going to again. . . . I do not trust the bureaucracy. Everything I want secret is going to be kept right here in my own hands.

Kissinger: You're in much better shape. It makes it very important after you leave office - for you to. . . compile your records in such a way that the future historians can work with them.



http://www.ellsberg.net/writing/Nixon_Tapes.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. Jeff Koopersmith at AMPOL suggests ...
that under the law, Bush could be subject to the death penalty if that is proven and that "assets" were killed as a result of the leak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. I wonder if it came from Poppy Bush, the idea,
I mean. Wasn't he head of the CIA in the seventies? This sounds petulant and childish enough to have come out of his mouth or brain. Such a spiteful, arrogant, dangerous thing to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. My answers to your three questions
Yes.

No, see next answer.

Everybody in the administration would fall on their swords first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC